[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: Shawnee, KS
- To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: RE: Shawnee, KS
- From: "Ken Clark" <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 11:03:53 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <01BE50F5.12BA4740@electioncentral>
A great question for the support people on the support list.
I don't think I quite understand their set up though. Why are they getting
more than one sequence for their cumulative centers? Is there more than one
report precinct in those vote centers? Did they regenerate sequence
Whatever you do, make sure you are very carefull. Changing stuff like this
after you have printed artwork is very dangerous.
And yes, GEMS still works with all versions of the AccuVote firmware.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Hintz [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 1999 10:48 AM
> To: Ken Clark (E-mail)
> Subject: Shawnee, KS
> Hi Ken,
> Shawnee County, KS has finally been able to create ballots and
> send over the ps files to their printer. Their problem now is
> this, they forgot to define their 3 different cumulative vote
> centers, and now have done so, but it has created an additional
> ballot with sequence 2 for each of their cumulative vote centers.
> Will this affect their previous ps files, or will they just have
> to send these additional ps files to their printer? Also, they
> were updated with a new chip for their cumulative Accu-Vote
> centers to be able to accept all sequences. This chip will still
> work with the newest version of Gems (188.8.131.52) won't it?
> I will try to check into all this with their database here as
> soon as I can, but I am busy testing Accu-Touch software, so I
> was hoping you can answer these questions for me before I do testing.
> Jeff Hintz
> Global Election Systems