[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: AVTS - System Total
- To: <email@example.com>
- Subject: RE: AVTS - System Total
- From: "Ken Clark" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:43:33 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <01BEBEF5.7DC94540@sdn-ar-004neomahP079.dialsprint.net>
> From: Jeff Hintz [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 10:29 AM
> To: Ken Clark (E-mail)
> Again, we need to check the FEC guidelines for DRE machines. I
> think that a protective counter for the lifetime of the machine a
> requirement by them .
> Jeff Hintz
:-) We would fail this requirement with the registry entry.
I could see this being an issue, however, and this does have a scary ring to
it. Tab, can you dust the FEC guidelines off the shelf and take a look? It
might even be worth calling Wyle and seeing whether there is some
"interpretation" of this rule that would be favorable to us if it exists.
Does this counter serve *any* practical purpose outside meeting an FEC