[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Standard test deck
3 ring binder detailing election products groups - that support received in
----- Original Message -----
From: "John McLaurin" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 2:47 PM
Subject: RE: Standard test deck
> what is an "election products group handbook"?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of
> Tari Runyan
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 5:03 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Standard test deck
> look in your Election Products groups handbook - that we got in
> McKinney -Appendix c for test deck descriptions
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Donald W. Biszmaier" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: "Support" <Support@gesn.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:19 PM
> Subject: Standard test deck
> > In a conversation with David Dean at Global Printing the subject of a
> > standard test deck came up and I told him I would post something on the
> > support list.
> > An example was a test deck for a demo which contained approx 40 ballots
> > for what I would have considered 16 as needed.
> > Is the following fairly common or do some laws require something else?
> > 1 blank
> > 1 full
> > 1 first cand
> > 2 2nd cand
> > 3 3rd cand
> > 1 4th cand
> > 2 5th cand etc.
> > 1 all write in candidates
> > 1 overvote
> > * treat number of "vote for" as 1 cand.
> > "vote for two"
> > 1 first two cand
> > 2 second two cand. etc.
> > Thanks: Don B