$2000 is the kind of sum we want to be thinking about as an exploratory retainer. $2k projects (day or two) tend to just get done. This isn't one of those projects.
I think you mean could be available. If this were already a GEMS feature, there would be no reason for them to pay $2k or any other figure.
I am sure you are right, and I think this one of the lessons here. If we can find six or eight counties willing to pay $2.5k for this, it would certainly be worth doing as a priority.
I have to say though, $2.5k times eight sounds like a hard way to make a buck. It would be better to concentrate on $30k times two projects instead I think.
This is true as a statement, but incomplete. These enhancements are neither charged for, nor obliged.
It is worth keeping prospective here though. The suggestion is a good one, and it is now on the development plate. I have no doubt that this request will one day find its way into GEMS and JResults. Just not Aug 3.