I think you're absolutely right.  I wonder what happens if the SEC lodges
complaints and the FPPC determines there was a conflict of interest in terms
of the long term contracts?

Thank you for the head's up on the lawsuit.

By the way, did Enron just hire McNally?  If so, what are they doing?

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 10:29 AM
To: sgovenar@govadv.com
Subject: Re: SBX 31



Thanks.  Looks like one thing good has happened for them today.  I don't
think Maviglio will be able to stay.  Your thoughts?  I'm glad he made some
money off of Enron stock.  (What a jerk.)

Also, we did file the amended complaint yesterday and the motion to quash
will be filed today.

Best,
Jeff


"Scott
Govenar"             To:     "Jeff Dasovich"
<jdasovic@enron.com>
<sgovenar@gov        cc:
adv.com>             Subject:     SBX 31

07/31/2001
12:28 PM
Please
respond to
sgovenar






Jeff,

Following up on yesterday's conversation, SBX1 31 did contain some
expedited
review provisions for CPUC and DWR decisions and was chaptered into law on
May 10.  The first special session ended on or about May 15 which means the
expedited provisions take effect on or about August 15.  The intent of the
budget language was to have that take effect even sooner.

Scott







**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************