Here's what I'll do.  I'll go back and look at the materials they sent us.  Maybe you could do the same, so at least we have an idea of what they'll claim our "contribution" is.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Curry, Wanda  
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:26 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Total DA Load at 5.7% as of 8/31

Yeah.  Guess we do have to worry about that.   I was thinking it would apply to our receivable, not the total under collection, but that would not make sense.  Maybe the other idea will work.  It gets difficult to continue to think of ways around some of these problems.  Thanks,
Wanda

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff  
Sent:	Tuesday, October  23, 2001 6:16 PM
To:	Curry, Wanda
Subject:	RE: Total DA Load at 5.7% as of 8/31

Do we run the risk of them saying, Enron, on average your customers represented 5% of the load, therefore you owe us 5% of the undercollection, or $3B * 0.05 = $150M?  That's my biggest concern.  Thoughts?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Curry, Wanda  
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:58 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	FW: Total DA Load at 5.7% as of 8/31


What do you think about the % of load argument?  This is Sue's e-mail.  

Wanda

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mara, Susan  
Sent:	Monday, October  1, 2001 2:25 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Belden, Tim; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Comnes, Alan; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Frazier, Lamar; Keeney, Kevin; Gahn, Scott; Swain, Steve; Lavorato, John; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Calger, Christopher F.; Mara, Susan; Black, Don; Richter, Jeff; Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Kingerski, Harry; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Higgason, Kelly; Whalley, Greg; Mellencamp, Lisa; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	Total DA Load at 5.7% as of 8/31

The new data are out from the CPUC.  Only reported as of 8/31/01.

 << File: DA Load as of 8-31-01.doc >>