The dial in number for this conference call is:

	Time:			2:00 p.m. CDT
	Date:			TODAY, October 29, 2001
	Dial in#:		1-877-232-4392
	Host Code:		101971 (JIM STEFFES)
	Participant Code:	603371

Conference Room EB4746 has been reserved for this conference call.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.  
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 8:12 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Williams, Robert C.; Mike Day (E-mail); Swain, Steve
Cc:	Noske, Linda J.; Shapiro, Richard; Sanders, Richard B.; Sharp, Vicki
Subject:	FW: Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy - MEETING TODAY AT 2pm Houston Time

To discuss this outline and our issues list, can people attend a 2pm Houston Time call.  The meet and confer may be on-going, but maybe either Jeff or Sue can jump off.

Linda Noske will be sending out a call-in number.

Thanks,

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.  
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 8:04 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Williams, Robert C.; Mike Day (E-mail)
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard; Sanders, Richard B.; Sharp, Vicki
Subject:	Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy

Following last week's meeting, here is my recommendation on how to proceed with SCE.

1.	Form Enron Negotiation Team

	My recommendation is to use the same team we used with PG&E + Jeff Dasovich.  My understanding was that Lisa M. was the lead negotiator - I would not change this.  Jeff should only be there to make introductions.

2.	Meet & Confer (10/29)

	Sue Mara and Jeff Dasovich will listen and report back to everyone on what happens.  

3.	Reformed Stipulation

	I would propose that we take a wait and see approach to this document.  Based on Dasovich's idea to get together with SCE on Thursday, maybe let this ride.

4.	Meeting

	My understanding is that (Jeff D. please correct) SCE can meet with us this Thursday.  Can everyone make it that needs to be there?  Probably meet in California.  We should put the laundry list on the table.

Please let me know what else we need to discuss or if anyone disagrees.

Thanks,

Jim