fyi

----- Forwarded by Rob Walls/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 12:22 PM -----

	"Walker, Christopher" <christopher.walker@linklaters.com>
	12/03/2000 06:20 AM
		 
		 To: "'Rob.Walls@enron.com'" <Rob.Walls@enron.com>, "'Bruce 
Lundstrom@enron.com'" <Bruce.Lundstrom@enron.com>, "'Paul.Kraske@enron.com'" 
<Paul.Kraske@enron.com>, "'Sandeep.Katwala@enron.com'" 
<Sandeep.Katwala@enron.com>, "Katwala, Sandeep" 
<sandeep.katwala@linklaters.com>, "'lbrasher@skadden.com'" 
<lbrasher@skadden.com>, "Inman, Jonathan" <jonathan.inman@linklaters.com>
		 cc: "Salt, Stuart" <stuart.salt@linklaters.com>, "Walker, Christopher" 
<christopher.walker@linklaters.com>
		 Subject: Dabhol Power Project - Arbitration-Related Materials


I attach the results of a first trawl through the archives.

Of the attached materials,I think that the most relevant,for present
purposes,will be the following:-

(1) the enforcement memo produced by Peter Cornell and Atul Rajadhyaksha;

(2) the final consent award (as I drafted it) (the tribunal made the award
in the terms requested so far as I can recall;we are retrieving the original
from the papers in storage).

Item (2) above binds the GOM in relation to the PPA,SSA and the GOM
Guarantee. However,strictly,the MSEB is not bound,because it was never a
party to the 2 arbitrations begun by DPC in August 1995.


>  <<951013-CXW-StatementOfClaim.frame>>
> <<951107-CXW-StmtofGenBackgrd.frame>>  <<951109-CXW-ClaimantSubms.frame>>
>  <<960403 PNC Dabhol  Enforcement  Memo.frame>>  <<960701-CXW-JointRequest
> to Tribunal.frame>>  <<961210-CXW-FinalConsentAward.frame>>
> <<g19ssk_000290a.frame>>  <<g19ssk_000301a1.frame>>  <<dabhol_interim
> award on jurisdiction.doc>>
>
>
>
>
>


_____________________________________________________________

This e-mail is sent by or on behalf of Linklaters,
10/F Alexandra House, Chater Road, Hong Kong.

A list of the firm's principals will be provided to the
recipient(s) of this email upon request.

This statement is made in compliance with the Law Society of
Hong Kong's Practice Direction on the Format of Electronic
Communications.

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal
rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know
by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
_____________________________________________________________

 - 951013-CXW-StatementOfClaim.frame
 - 951107-CXW-StmtofGenBackgrd.frame
 - 951109-CXW-ClaimantSubms.frame
 - 960403 PNC Dabhol  Enforcement  Memo.frame
 - 960701-CXW-JointRequest to Tribunal.frame
 - 961210-CXW-FinalConsentAward.frame
 - g19ssk_000290a.frame
 - g19ssk_000301a1.frame
 - dabhol_interim award on jurisdiction.doc