Bill, attached is a redlined second draft of this morning's letter.  Let me
know what you think.

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rapp, Bill" <Bill.Rapp@enron.com>
To: <douglass@energyattorney.com>
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:12 PM
Subject: FW: SCG Advice 2837-A



Dan,

This is a follow up to our telephone conversation of this
afternoon. The attachment, which apparently originated with you, is what
we will talk about during our conference call at 8:00 a.m. (California
time) on Monday. Thanks.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Donoho, Lindy
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 4:01 PM
> To: Rapp, Bill; Hass, Glen; Blair, Lynn; Harris, Steven; Kowalke,
> Terry; Lokey, Teb; Kilmer III, Robert; #99 Tech Support,; Watson,
> Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK
> Subject: FW: SCG Advice 2837-A
>
> After discussing with Lynn and Glen, we think that we would like to
> file comments in this proceeding concerning an issue we have had since
> this has been implemented on Nov 1.  In instances where SoCal happens
> to call their OFO in the Intraday 2 cycle, it can cause Transwestern
> to have Shipper imbalances because we do not have an opportunity to
> pass-along these reductions to our upstream parties.  We think we
> would like to file a letter that may mention our general support of
> the "direction" of SoCal's changes, but that we do have an issue that
> has developed since actual implementation that we are currently
> working on with them.  Lynn & I worked on this rough general
> description we thought could be incorporated into a brief letter.
>
> "If SoCal calls an OFO in the Intraday 2 Cycle, an
> allocation is passed to Transwestern through the confirmation process
> with SoCal.  Due to the timing of these OFO's, Transwestern is unable
> to confirm such reductions with Transwestern's upstream parties."
>
> Lynn thinks if we are unable to resolve this issue with SoCal, TW
> could have high Shipper imbalance exposure.
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Harris, Steven
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:50 AM
> To: Donoho, Lindy
> Subject: FW: SCG Advice 2837-A
>
> Lindy , can you please take a look at this and let me know if we
> should file comments. Thanks. You might see if Glen has looked at it
> yet.
>
> Steve
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: "Dan Douglass" <douglass@energyattorney.com>@ENRON
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:02 PM
> To: Hass, Glen; Harris, Steven
> Cc: Gregg Klatt
> Subject: SCG Advice 2837-A
>
>
> Glen and Steve:
>
> The attached supplemental advice filing by SoCalGas replaces the
> changes to Rule 30, Transportation of Customer-Owned Gas, proposed by
> AL2837.   The purpose of this filing is to  describe the new internal
> receipt point operating procedures that SoCalGas is  implementing, and
> to request Commission authorization to include the revised  operating
> procedures in Rule 30. SoCalGas says this step is being taken in
> anticipation that it will be replaced with a system of firm tradable
> intrastate  transmission rights in Gas Industry Restructuring (GIR)
> proceeding, I.99-07-003.
> During  the GIR panel hearings, several parties requested that
> SoCalGas publish its  windowing criteria in tariffs to facilitate a
> better understanding of the method  used to allocate receipt point
> capacity.  SoCalGas agreed to make  such a filing, and D.99-07-015
> directed SoCalGas to file an advice letter adding  windowing
> information to its tariffs.  To comply with this directive, on August
> 6, 1999, SoCalGas filed AL2837, which has not been acted on by the
> Commission.
> Customer complaints about SoCalGas' windowing  procedures have
> convinced SoCalGas that it should replace its internal  windowing
> operating procedures with a system that is open to the maximum
> operating capacity at each SoCalGas receipt point.  SoCalGas is making
> these internal  operating changes effective November 1, 2001.
> SoCalGas held meetings with upstream  pipelines on October 17, and
> with interested customers and stakeholders on  October 18, regarding
> the upcoming changes.  They were invited to ask any questions in  the
> days leading up to the meetings.
> Comments and/or protests are due on November 21.  Have a good
> weekend!
> Dan
>
> Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
> 5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite  244
> Woodland Hills, CA 91367
> Tel:   (818) 596-2201
> Fax:   (818) 346-6502douglass@energyattorney.com
> <<mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com>>
>
>  - AL2837-A.PDF <<AL2837-A.PDF>>


**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************