done

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff  
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:13 PM
To: Calger, Christopher F.
Subject: RE: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness

Apologies.  Can we make it 4?




	Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enronXgate 05/16/2001 12:26 PM 	   To: Jeff 
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron  cc:   Subject: RE: Rate Agreement between DWR and 
the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness


3:00 PM?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff  
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:23 AM
To: Calger, Christopher F.
Subject: RE: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness

I'm trying to meet a deadline at the moment, but are you free this 
afternoon?  I have some information that can help a lot in that analysis.

Best,
Jeff





	Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enronXgate 05/16/2001 12:19 PM 	   To: Jeff 
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron  cc: Tracy Ngo/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: RE: Rate 
Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness





 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>  	 << OLE Object: 
Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> 





Thanks Jeff.  On a related note, we are trying to put together a financial 
"headroom" forecast for DWR/State of California that goes out a few years and 
shows:  

Rate Revenues
less:  Utility gen costs
 QF costs
 DWR PPA's
 DWR spot purchases
Margin
Total Deficit

Bond Issue
Bond Principal & Interest

Would you know how to get something like that? 

Regards,

Chris


 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff  
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:12 AM
To: Calger, Christopher F.; Comnes, Alan; Shapiro, Richard; skean@enron.com; 
Steffes, James; Yoder, Christian; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness
Sensitivity: Confidential

FYI:  Just got off the phone with Michael Hoffman, who's one of two key 
outside financial advisors to Davis on the electricity crisis. The 
administration is trying to get a legally binding agreement between the PUC 
and DWR to ensure that the PUC doesn't muck around with the money (via 
utility rates) DWR requires to be creditworthy.  They were shooting for this 
Friday to have a draft of the document read for folks to review, but it now 
looks like it won't get resolved until (at the earliest) next week----seems 
that the one PUC lawyer who can actually do the work is on vacation.  Go 
figure.

Best,
Jeff