o.k. 

Thanks


   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/09/2001 12:40 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: deal 541638  

Testing was done in the test database; however, once they released the new 
version of deal entry into production, they tested one more time to make sure 
that the new fields were pulling into our scheduling reports. It was a 
precautionary measure taken so that we wouldn't enter deals all day long only 
to find out that they wouldn't show up in the Enpower to CAPS report at the 
end of the day. Sorry for the confusion.

Kate



Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/09/2001 10:34 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Re: deal 541638  


Hi Kate, 

Can you please let Phil know that he should be testing deals in the enpower 
test database not the actual system.  

Thanks



   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/09/2001 12:20 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: deal 541638  

This was just a practice deal entered by Phil yesterday to test our new 
version of deal entry. He zeroed out the volume, but neglected to kill the 
deal or at least change it to no confirm. So this is NOT a good deal - I'm 
killing it now.

Thanks,
Kate



Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/09/2001 09:46 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: deal 541638

Kate can you ask Phil Platter is Dane Energy Corp the correct broker on this 
deal?

Thanks