Hey Rob,

Last time, one more change, if you will?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra  
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:36 PM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	RE: Enron's Proposed Modifications for Parental Guarantee

 I can agree to 7 business day with a revision to the proposed language in the second line to read as follows, " ... Guarantor shall pay the Obligations within 7 business days ....."

 Let me know if this goes?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mims, Patrice L.  
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:29 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	FW: Enron's Proposed Modifications for Parental Guarantee

Hey lady,

Does the below referenced language work for you?

Let me know.

Thanks



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rob.Smith@dynegy.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Rob+2ESmith+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:27 PM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	RE: Enron's Proposed Modifications for Parental Guarantee


Patrice,
Please see the below comments from my attorney.  Let me know if we can work
with this.
Thanks

I suggest revising that sentence as follows to avoid any potential conflict
within the terms of the Guaranty itself and to accommodate Enron's
reasonable request for a specific number of days:

     " . . . and shall be deemed sufficient notice that, subject to
Paragraph 9 of this Guaranty, Guarantor agrees to pay the Obligations
within 7 business days after receiving the Payment Demand."


Rob Smith
Retail/Alliance Credit Manager
1000 Louisiana Street Suite 5800
Houston, TX 77002
Phone 713.767.6090
Fax 713.767.8772




                    Patrice.L.Mims
                    @enron.com            To:     IMCEANOTES-Rob+2ESmith+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@enron.com
                                          cc:
                    09/25/01 08:44        Subject:     RE: Enron's Proposed Modifications for Parental Guarantee
                    AM






Hey Rob,

We have one more comment for you to consider:

We must have a definitive number of days in case, "Enron makes a demand on
this guaranty".  We cannot leave the contract silent on that issue.  How
about making it 7 days instead of 5 days.  Our lawyers say that we must
have a definitive number of days.

Your turn!

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Rob.Smith@dynegy.com@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Rob+2ESmith+40dynegy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]


   Sent:   Monday, September 24, 2001 1:56 PM
   To:     Mims, Patrice L.
   Subject:  Re: Enron's Proposed Modifications for Parental Guarantee

   Patrice,
   Please let me know this is workable and I will get this issued ASAP.
   Thanks
   Rob Smith
   Retail/Alliance Credit Manager
   1000 Louisiana Street Suite 5800
   Houston, TX 77002
   Phone 713.767.6090
   Fax 713.767.8772

   ----- Forwarded by Rob Smith/HOU/Dynegy on 09/24/01 01:54 PM -----

                       Ernie Kohnke
                                            To:     Rob
   Smith/HOU/Dynegy@Dynegy
                       09/24/01 01:53       cc:
                       PM                   Subject:     Re: Enron's
   Proposed Modifications for Parental Guarantee(Document
                                            link: Rob Smith)




   Rob,

   I have made a few changes and one correction.  I deleted the reference
   to
   "must pay within 5 business days" added to paragraph 3.  If Enron does
   make
   a demand under this guaranty, there is no way we can make payment within
   those 5 days (especially since we will need to rely on an outside party
   to
   provide data to us).  As you know, however, when we receive a demand
   under
   a guaranty, we move quickly to verify the request and make payments
   where
   appropriate.

   I completed the information in paragraph 4(a).

   I deleted the second copy of the reps and warranties of corporate
   authority.

   Finally, I reinserted "excluding choice of law provisions . . . "
   language
   to try to keep the case under Texas law, assuming a dispute ever arises.

   All told, most of the changes look fine.

   Thanks.

   Ernie

   (See attached file: Dyn to Enron 1.doc)



                       Rob Smith
                                            To:     Ernie
   Kohnke/HOU/Dynegy@Dynegy
                       09/24/01             cc:     Thomas
   White/HOU/Dynegy@Dynegy
                       11:15 AM             Subject:     Enron's Proposed
   Modifications for Parental Guarantee







   ----- Forwarded by Rob Smith/HOU/Dynegy on 09/24/01 11:14 AM -----

                       "Mims, Patrice
                       L."                     To:
   <rob.smith@dynegy.com>
                       <Patrice.L.Mims@        cc:
                       enron.com>              Subject:     Enron's
   Proposed Modifications for Parental Guarantee

                       09/24/01 11:11
                       AM








   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
   the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
   by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
   delete
   all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
   not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************
   (See attached file: Dynegy HOldings Parent Guaranty)




    - Dyn to Enron 1.doc << File: Dyn to Enron 1.doc >>
    - Dynegy HOldings Parent Guaranty << File: Dynegy HOldings Parent
   Guaranty >>