---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/06/2001 06:17 
PM ---------------------------


Richard Leibert@EES
02/06/2001 06:15 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: Cost plus contract for Co Op City  

Kay,

Have just received both of your e-mails.  Will get involved today!

L



Kay Mann@ENRON
02/06/2001 04:31 PM
To: Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Fred L 
Kelly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Peter Nassab/Corp/Enron@Enron, 
Robert Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, John G 
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jude 
Rolfes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mark Bernstein/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Cost plus contract for Co Op City

As a follow up to my previous e-mail, here is the second request, which was 
in my opinion adequately addressed by John Schwartzenburg.  
I am frustrated with beginning the process over again.  

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/06/2001 04:33 
PM ---------------------------


Kay Mann
02/01/2001 12:06 PM
To: David Lund/ENRON@enronXgate, John 
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G 
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter Nassab/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Bernstein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jude 
Rolfes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 

Subject: Cost plus contract for Co Op City

Gentlemen,

As Dave and John know, I'm working on a deal for ENA (and with Jude) which 
has as one aspect a cost plus EPC contract for the construction of a power 
plant.  We need to put together the T's and C's for a cost plus contract, and 
since it is possible that NEPCO might be the contractor, I wanted to use 
something that is acceptable to NEPCO.  I will then take the laboring oar in 
order to get a working draft prepared for this project.

As always, I'm on a short time frame, so your response would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Kay