Ellen,
 One more thing, when the deal is confirmed, it should be confirmed as an 
Houston Pipe Line Company deal.  If you have any questions please call me, 
Barbara Gray or Jeff Hodge.



	Ellen Wallumrod@ENRON
	12/12/2000 10:42 AM
		
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: New Deals


Dan & Janet,

Is this a confirmation of a deal or just an offer ?
Have you got a deal number ? 
Our systems can not generate a confirmation without a deal number, so if this 
is just an offer, can we just send out Janet's attached document ?

Regards
Ellen



Dan J Hyvl@ECT
12/12/2000 10:31 AM
To: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: New Deals

Ellen,
 With this added information, can you generate the contemplated confirmation?
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 10:29 AM -----

	Janet H Wallis
	12/12/2000 09:57 AM
		
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: New Deals

Forget the greenhouse requirements and  just make it requirements up to 50 
MMbtu a day.  The meter number is #1598.  
Also, the GTC method is fine with me.

Thanks,
J



Dan J Hyvl
12/12/2000 09:44 AM
To: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T 
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Re: New Deals  

Janet,
 Two items regarding the Panther deal.   What is meant by "Greenhouse 
requirements"?  New delivery point, can be get a better description about 
this point, is it currently in existence, if so, how was it put in, who was 
the deal maker for the installation, etc.  After this information is 
provided, I see no reason why this shouldn't be documented by the confirm 
desk using a standard    GTC confirm.  



	Janet H Wallis
	12/12/2000 09:17 AM
		 
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: New Deals

Panther



I will send the Entex deal later, thanks.

Janet