Darren was looking at an "old" report.  We re-ran the report and it balanced, which makes sense.

Thanks for your patience while Darren runs up the steep learning curve.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams III, Bill  
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 8:59 AM
To:	Cavanaugh, Darren; Reyes, Jim
Cc:	Symes, Kate
Subject:	Congestion/Enpower to CAPS variance

Jim and Darren,

We relieved Path 15 congestion for HE 7 on Saturday morning.  We flowed 10 mws from Malin to FC345. This resulted in the 10 mw "variance" in the report. I have added deals to Enpower to flatten the report, these deals are only necessary for the sake of the report. The identical variance in the north and south indicates a wheel or load shift. I prefer to not enter these extra deals. Please see me with questions if you do not understand why the report variance exists.

Thanks,
Bill