FYI

-----Original Message----- 
From: "Saathoff, Kent" <KSaathoff@ercot.com>@ENRON 
Sent: Fri 11/16/2001 2:58 PM 
To: Twiggs, Thane 
Cc: Walker, Mark; Adams, John 
Subject: RE: OOMC/OOME



Thane,

There must be some miscommunication.  I just talked with John and he

knows that an OOME instruction is necessary to get energy from OOMC

capacity.  It is not required by the protocols to bid in to balancing

market as is Replacement.  That causes us some operation problems and we

may ask for that requirement to be applied to OOMC as well.

Kent

-----Original Message-----

From: Twiggs, Thane

Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:59 PM

To: Saathoff, Kent

Cc: Walker, Mark

Subject: OOMC/OOME

Importance: High


I have a follow up question on our discussion at the TAC meeting last

week.  As we discussed, an OOMC instruction for hours 0-24 at 50MW would

for example require a unit to be prepared to provide the 50MW, but not

to actually provide the energy.  Another unit specific instruction or

OOME would be required for the unit to actually run at 50MW.

As recent as this morning, we were told that ERCOT would provide us an

OOME instruction when they want us to run after an OOMC instruction.

However, they also said that we were operating outside the protocols due

to John Adams' interpretation that when we receive an OOMC for a certain

time period at a certain level we should be generating.

We need immediate clarification on this issue.



**********************************************************************

This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate

and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of

the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure

by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient

(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender

or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and

delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments

hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not

create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron

Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other

party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by

estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.

**********************************************************************