We got a good bit of support in the comments, if that's what you mean by winning.  All the marketers objected to the increase in pooling areas, and the SoCalGas proposal did not rule out keeping the current pools.  A different group of commenters called for demand charge credits, and there was some support expressed for requiring capacity turnback.  

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.  
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:40 AM
To:	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Subject:	RE: Comments of the Other Parties on El Paso System Reallocation, RP00-336

Are we winning?  Any movement on our issues?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.  
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:33 PM
To:	Lawner, Leslie; Allen, Phillip K.; Black, Don; Calcagno, Suzanne; Courtney, Mark; Dasovich, Jeff; Ermis, Frank; Fulton, Donna; Gay, Randall L.; Grigsby, Mike; Hewitt, Jess P.; Holst, Keith; Kaufman, Paul; Kuykendall, Tori; Mara, Susan; McMichael Jr., Ed; Miller, Stephanie; Nicolay, Christi L.; Smith, Matt; Sullivan, Patti; Superty, Robert; Tholt, Jane M.; Tycholiz, Barry
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Pharms, Melinda; Canovas, Guillermo
Subject:	RE: Comments of the Other Parties on El Paso System Reallocation, RP00-336

The attachment summarizes all of the comments filed by other parties in this proceeding.  They're now in alphabetical order by the party filing, and the ones that I added since last night are highlighted.  Let me know if you'd like a copy of any of them.

 << File: Summary of 10-15-01 Comments.doc >>