Attached is Ron's email and my response to him.


---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2000 11:13 
AM ---------------------------


Gerald Nemec
04/19/2000 02:06 PM
To: "Brown, Ronald" <Ronald_Brown@kne.com> @ ENRON
cc:  
Subject: Re: FW: Trailblazer CA  

Ron,  Couple of comments.  
 1.  Enitity Name - You noted that Trailblazer is a limited partnership.  The 
name should designate limited partnership in some form (e.g. Trailblazer 
Pipeline  Company, L.P.)  Also for an LP the General Partner will need to 
sign to make it binding.  The signature block should read as follows:

  Trailblazer Pipeline Company, L.P.
   by its General Partner, _________________________

 2.  The limitation on consequential damages limits any remedy under this 
agreement.  The only types of damages in a situation like this is really   
consequential.  I think it would benefit both parties to leave this 
limitation out of the agreement.

If you would like to discuss these issues, please contact me at (713) 
853-3512.  Thank You.





"Brown, Ronald" <Ronald_Brown@kne.com> on 04/18/2000 01:54:06 PM
To: "'gerald.nemec@enron.com'" <gerald.nemec@enron.com>
cc:  
Subject: FW: Trailblazer CA


My comments are shown redlined.  Let me know if you have any problems with
my changes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald Nemec [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 10:05 AM
To: ronald_brown@kindermorgan.com
Cc: Jamie Ginsberg
Subject: Trailblazer CA




Per Jaime Ginsberg's request, I am forwarding our form of Confidentiality
Agreement for your review.

(See attached file: TrailBlazerCA.doc)


 - TrailBlazerCA.doc