Jack IS pretty juicy....but we shouldn't waste his precious fluids on Peevish Angelides.

I think sending it directly to Loretta makes more sense....she's the one with the regulatory portfolio over the issue...and Phil's tantrum doesn't deserve the price of stamp, much less a direct response.

Dot



"Dasovich, Jeff" wrote:

> Guess who?  Me again.  You thought about having your guy Jack (who's
> likely got the most juice of anyone in the group) go to the Governor and
> tell him to tell Angelides to knock it off and to back off?
>
> Second, what do you think about sending the letter directly to
> Angelides--after all, he's the one who's being a chowder head--and
> cc'ing Loretta?
>
> Third, I should be able to get you something on our view of RTOs.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************