FYI.  Suggested addressing it to Angelides, but they didn't want to "dignify" his letter.  They decided that, ultimately, Loretta's in charge, and addressed it to her.  Had a great talk with Sarah.  She's following up on a few things.  You may want to touch base with her re: hearings on DWR rev. req.  You ever received my (modest) edits to the Karl Wood letter?

Best,
Jeff

PS Is that article you sent me re: bad contracts from today's papers?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dorothy Rothrock [mailto:drothrock@cmta.net]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:13 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: [Fwd: Final letter to Loretta Lynch]


took awhile.....

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Final letter to Loretta Lynch
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 11:45:32 -0800
From: lkaye@ka-pow.com
To:
Dorothy_Rothrock@ka-pow.com,Bill_Booth@ka-pow.com,cra@calretailers.com,ek@a-klaw.com,mikahl@ka-pow.com,djsmith@s-k-w.com,dhunter@s-k-w.com,Derek
Naten <DEREK.NATEN@ROCHE.COM>,'Dominic DiMare'
<dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>,"Barbara R. Barkovich (E-mail)"
<brbarkovich@earthlink.net>,"Keith McCrea (E-mail)"
<kmccrea@sablaw.com>,"Dan L Carroll (E-mail)"
<dcarroll@dbsr.com>,bhauck@cbrt.org,kclark@cbrt.org
CC: David_Fogarty@ka-pow.com,thull@ka-pow.com,egarcia@ka-pow.com

Attached is a final version of the letter faxed today to Loretta Lynch.
Please call or write if you'd like a faxed copy with the signatures. 
(And
lemme know your fax number.)  If this letter needs to be distributed to
some service list, I will assume an attorney-at-law will perform that
duty.



(See attached file: Response to Angelides, 10.24.01,LK rev 2.doc)