Dave,

Per your conversation with Mark last week, it appears the Confirmation Desk 
people are still waiting for the "oops trade" language.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/02/2001 10:09 AM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter
	01/02/2001 09:57 AM
		 
		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: EOL revision language


---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT on 01/02/2001 
09:57 AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Kevin Meredith @ ENRON                           01/02/2001 09:14 AM
	

To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: EOL revision language  

We never received any language from any EOL individual.  We have not 
discussed revision language for EOL deals with Legal or EOL.


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Larry Joe Hunter @ ECT                           12/29/2000 05:04 PM
	

To: Kevin Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: EOL revision language

Kevin,

Is there some specific revision language that we've been given by the EOL 
group for use with revised EOL deals?

Legal is claiming that we should have received something long ago from 
someone on the EOL side, but I don't recall ever getting anything.

Thanks,
Joe