---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron on 04/10/2001 09:26 AM ---------------------------


"Schoene, Jim" <Jim.Schoene@neg.pge.com> on 04/06/2001 02:49:12 PM
To:	"'Stephanie.Miller@enron.com'" <Stephanie.Miller@enron.com>
cc:	 

Subject:	RE: PG&E Gas Transmission Quarterly Meeting


I see how you are doing this.  You are using some early estimates of fuel I
gave you.  You know you should not trust me.  We have some better numbers
now.  It turns out that our average fuel usage rate for calendar 2000 was
.0044 % per pipeline mile.  Stretching this out over 612 miles, KG to Malin
yields a rate of 2.69%.  This is just one place to start when examining the
impact of the expansion.  The modeling of the expansion yields an
incremental rate for the 200,000 mcfd of 7.46%.  If you combine those on a
weighted average you will get 3.24%.  The quantities at KG are significantly
higher than in your estimate.  Regardless, these are the numbers we are
currently predicting.  The actuals will be different and perhaps lower as
the operators optimize the system performance.  Who knows.  Also we are
predicting that the pipeline looping will be constructed in advance and put
into service ahead of the compression.  So on a long term basis (like the
first year) the fuel rate will decrease due to the  looping.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephanie.Miller@enron.com [mailto:Stephanie.Miller@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 3:31 PM
To: Schoene, Jim
Subject: Re: PG&E Gas Transmission Quarterly Meeting



I had promised that I would send my fuel calculation over! Please check on
this:

Current fuel (king to malin) = 2,200,000 mmbtu/d*.03 = 66,000 mmbtu

Proposed fuel = 2,400,000 mmbtu/d*.036 = 86,400 mmbtu

Difference = 20,400/200,000 incremental capacity = 10.2%

Please advise!!

Thanks.

Stephanie





"Schoene, Jim" <Jim.Schoene@neg.pge.com> on 03/29/2001 04:31:49 PM

To:   "Bill Collier (E-mail)" <colliw@texaco.com>, "Dave Kohler (E-mail)"
       <dkohler@br-inc.com>, "David Livingston (E-mail)"
      <david.livingston@cinergy.com>, "Frank Ermis (E-mail)"
      <fermis@enron.com>, "Luther Shankster (E-mail)"
      <jlshankster@equiva.com>, "Peter D. Cervin (E-mail)"
      <pcervin@br-inc.com>, "Rick Johnson (E-mail)"
      <johnson.rick@epenergy.com>, "Stacy Chang (E-mail)"
      <schang@cook-inlet.com>, "Stephanie Miller (E-mail)"
      <stephanie.miller@enron.com>, "Steve Scheffler (E-mail)"
      <scheffsp@bp.com>, "Tom Toerner (E-mail)"
      <thomas_j_toerner@reliantenergy.com>, "Brent Blanar (E-mail)"
      <bblanar@coral-energy.com>, "Henry Delony (E-mail)"
      <hankd@calpine.com>, "Steve South (E-mail)" <ssouth@enron.com>,
      "Randy Richards (E-mail)"     <randall.richards@elpaso.com>
cc:

Subject:  PG&E Gas Transmission Quarterly Meeting


Just a heads up -- The next GTN Quarterly meeting in Houston is at the
downtown Hyatt on April 6 commencing with lunch at 11:30 AM.  The agenda is
posted on the web site under the Notices section.  Please RSVP as
instructed
in the notice or respond to this note.  We will have the usual highly
stimulating stuff -- after the meeting.


PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.