- Agree on EOL group responsible to point of clicking. EOL Marketing will be responsible for contacting customers and getting signed PA's returned, but we plan on getting phone call assistance from Origination/Trading, where they already have a relationship with the individual at the customer company.

- The ETA which you sent had the section removed which would have allowed us to distribute customer names. (Clause 6a used to read "Confidential Information shall exclude the identification of Counterparty as a user of the Website")

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise  
Sent:	Saturday, January 05, 2002 9:12 AM
To:	Forster, David
Subject:	RE: Issues and Update

Sorry only just got to read this.

I sort of see EOL group as getting the customers to the point of being able to click and our marketers doing the masters.

Looks like we will not get approval anyway - see you Monday morning.

What did we send - it in or out??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David  
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:49 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Issues and Update

Louise,

Three questions/issues which I'd appreciate your feedback on:

1) I am planning to arrange for a meeting with gas and power originators/traders tomorrow to let them know what we are planning with the top 50 customers (sending draft PA's) and enlist their support for calls where we can leverage their relationships with the customers.

2) After some more thought, I'm on the fence about sending out the PA's without names. The following occurs to me:
	- Sending them out on Tuesday is only three days before we know what the final name will be
	- Sending them out with the final name probably helps our credibility
	- The PA/ETA is a very simple form; customers probably don't require the extra three days to review them.
	- Following the public release of our new Buyers' identity with the first release of the PA helps build a bit more excitement than otherwise.

3) I understand you are objecting to the provision which would allow us to release a customers' name to another company. I don't think most customers would object to this and getting the provisions in up front gives us more flexibility later. Can we keep this in?

Thanks,

Dave