Steve, this is going to possible make a difference in how much gets scheduled
at Socal.  So you may see a little lower numbers at time.  Let's discuss if that
does not make sense.  Thanks. Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron on 06/06/2001 06:09 AM ---------------------------


Darrell Schoolcraft
06/04/2001 12:42 PM
To:	Beverly Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Rivers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda Ward/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Terry Kowalke/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Albert Hernandez/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Amy Mulligan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Minter/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine McEvoy/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:	Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Gary Spraggins/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Terry Kowalke/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron 

Subject:	Intra-day 2 allocation on San Juan Lateral

Spoke to Lynn Blair, Kim Watson, Cynthia Rivers, Linda Ward, and Terry Kowalke, we would like to hold the same 
scheduled numbers on ID/2 from San Juan Lateral as we had scheduled for ID/1 from San Juan Lateral.  
We think this will help us minimize our Operator and Shipper imbalances.  
Please let us know if we start getting complaints from our customers.  
If anyone has other ideas or comments please let us know.

Example:

Non-Grid--    San Juan Scheduled      870,000
ID/1                                                                875,000
ID/2                                                                875,000 
(we will have to do the right mouse click and update the capacity to the flow rate needed.)