Heads up
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Phillips, George 
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:14 PM
To: Ruffer, Mary lynne
Subject: RE: December '00 Through June '01 Power Scheduls vs. Meter Data
 
Mary Lynne - I spoke with Pam/Chris S./Mike F.about this issue.  Since Chris is  charged with improving the general settlement process including this specific inssue, he has asked me to be available to answer all his questions and defer all questions I receive to him.  He stated that he understood the urgency and attention this issue commands and will respond accordingly.   
 
 
 
-----Original Message----- 
From: Ruffer, Mary lynne 
Sent: Wed 10/17/2001 7:42 AM 
To: Phillips, George 
Cc: 
Subject: FW: December '00 Through June '01 Power Scheduls vs. Meter Data
 
George - Do you know anything about this problem?  I would assume you would have seen large discrepancies b/w meter and scheduled.  Would appreciate a response asap as this has a great deal of attention!
 -----Original Message----- 
From:   Curry, Wanda  
Sent:   Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:20 PM 
To:     Ruffer, Mary lynne 
Subject:        FW: December '00 Through June '01 Power Scheduls vs. Meter Data 
 
 -----Original Message----- 
From:   O'Neil, Murray P.  
Sent:   Tuesday, October  16, 2001 4:18 PM 
To:     Curry, Wanda; Richter, Jeff 
Cc:     Reyes, Jim; Frazier, Michael; Gilbert, Bari; Gilbert, Scotty; Stokley, Chris 
Subject:        December '00 Through June '01 Power Scheduls vs. Meter Data 
Wanda and Jeff, 
Attached is the file we discussed putting together for your. 
Energy Schedules vs. Energy Usage (Meter Data) 
By looking at the information, it appears that the PGES book of business is the biggest problem. 
EES has constantly under scheduled the PGES book of business in the PGE3 load zone.  I'm nut sure if it is related to under scheduling or reporting incorrect meter data to the ISO. 
We discussed that starting on 2/1/01 the combined schedules for EES/PGES should have changed to 50mwh per hour (Both books of business included in this number). On averages.
Based on what I am seeing this is not the case. 
I have copied Michael Frazier on this message so he can take a look at the schedule information we received.  I have also included Jim Reyes in the Portland Volume Management group so he can look into the Meter vs. Schedule issues in April and May.  EES was scheduling volumes but never identified / reported usage (Meter data).  At the same time they were drastically under scheduling on PGE3
If anyone has questions please feel free to give me a call @ 503-702-9846 
<<EES_PGES Load Data 1200 - 0601_101601.xls>> 
Thanks - MO