Yes, I compared their blackline below against the draft I originally sent 
out, and the only changes were to the counterparty name, "or its affiliates" 
language, and NY from Texas, the same changes showing in the blackline below.



	Mark Greenberg@ENRON
	02/12/2001 04:50 PM
		 
		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: 360 Networks Enron Net Works NDA

Tana -

Is the below the form that you forwarded?

It looks different in places.

Please let me know.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 02/12/2001 04:49 PM -----

	Jennifer Farac <Jennifer.Farac@360.net>
	02/08/2001 01:52 PM
		 
		 To: "'Mark.Greenberg@enron.com'" <Mark.Greenberg@enron.com>
		 cc: Vanessa Wittman <vanessaw@360.net>
		 Subject: 360 Networks Enron Net Works NDA


Mark,

I have reviewed your standard form NDA and have noted two minor comments
thereon.  I have suggested the State of New York as a more neutral
jurisdiction and one that is widely used in commerical transactions, rather
than the State of Texas.  The other comments are self explanatory.

Please contact me should you have any concerns.



>  <<360 Networks - Enron NDA.doc>>

Jennifer Farac
Legal Counsel
360networks inc.
Direct: 604.648.7838
Fax:    604.648.7747
Email: jfarac@360.net

NOTE:  This email message contains information that is confidential and may
be privileged.  It is intended only for the addressee.  If you have received
this email message in error, please email the sender by replying to it and
then deleting it.  We appreciate your assistance in correcting this error.


 - 360 Networks - Enron NDA.doc