It is the same.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Cc: Williams, Bill; Mann, Kay; THOMAS CONSTANTINE; Rasmussen, Dale;
Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: LV Co Gen



I may be wrong, but I believe the version sent to day is the same one I
sent to Rose, Lisa et al on April 24.

Kay




"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 05/01/2001 12:40:33 PM

To:   "Williams, Bill" <Bill.Williams@enron.com>, "Mann, Kay"
<Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "THOMAS CONSTANTINE" <TCONSTAN@LLGM.COM>
cc:   "Rasmussen, Dale" <Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com>, "Engeldorf, Roseann"
<Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com>, "Bills, Lisa"
<Lisa.Bills@enron.com>

Subject:  RE: LV Co Gen

I have already incorporated Lee's comment in a new Version 7.  I am just
waiting for any additional comments.

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Bill [mailto:Bill.Williams@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Mann, Kay; THOMAS CONSTANTINE
Cc: Rasmussen, Dale; Thompson, Peter J.; Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: LV Co Gen


Kay - I just checked the April 24th draft.  The addition is not there
now, and it need to be.  By this e mail, Tom and Peter, please
incorporate those comments.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         Mann, Kay
> Sent:         Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:12 AM
> To:           THOMAS CONSTANTINE
> Cc:           Mann, Kay; Williams, Bill; Rasmussen, Dale;
pthompson@akllp.com;
> Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
> Subject:           RE: LV Co Gen
>
>
> I sent this email from GE to Dale/Bill after I received it.  Since
> Peter's last draft was April 24, I'm I assume this wasn't included:
>
>
>
>
>
> Kay/Bill,
>
> Bill says he agrees and accepts our comments to the A&A.
>
> One change required to the Rev 5 document.  In Exhibit B, Add item
> "27)One
> additional Human Machine Interface (HMI) per Unit (desktop PC type)"
>
> Include these changes and we can get this done tomorrow.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lee