Rudy-
In the contract it says that nominations for the following month are firm 
while the 60 and 90 day ranges are just estimates.  Since taking delivery of 
the smaller ship causes us to nominate another cargo within the same month, 
we were stipulating that only the first nomination is firm as the contract 
defines it.  With all that being said, we are still planning on working 
together as usual for a  schedule that works for both sides.
Regards,
Dan



"Rudy Adamiak" <radamiak@cabotlng.com> on 03/14/2001 01:57:32 PM
To: Dan.Masters@enron.com
cc:  
Subject: Re: 90 Day Schedule





Dan:

Could you confirm the reference in the following:

* This nomination not to count as firm per clause 7.2 (a) (v) due to April
4-8 delivery being a small cargo.

I don't understand your point.

Thanks,
Rudy




Dan.Masters@enron.com on 03/13/2001 03:38:18 PM

To:   Christopher Skinner/Cabot LNG@Cabot LNG, Jane Michalek/Cabot LNG@Cabot
      LNG, Rudy Adamiak/Cabot LNG@Cabot LNG, Victor.Vega@enron.com,
      swiedermann@EdisonMission.Com, Rick.Sierra@enron.com,
      Paul.Y'Barbo@enron.com, Joseph McKechnie/Cabot LNG@Cabot LNG
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:  90 Day Schedule



Chris,

As per clause 7.2 (a) (i) of the LNG sales contract we are providing you
EcoElctrica's Ninety Day Schedule given the two assumptions listed.

Assuming next ship is "Methane Arctic"
4-8 Apr '01    "Methane Arctic"
*26-30 Apr '01 "Matthew"
12-16 Jun '01  "Matthew"

* This nomination not to count as firm per clause 7.2 (a) (v) due to April
4-8 delivery being a small cargo.

Assuming next ship is "Matthew"
4-8 Apr '01    "Matthew"
14-18 May '01  "Matthew"
29 Jun- 5 Jul ' 01 "Matthew"


Regards,
Dan Masters