Daren,

FYI.  Per our discussion, the following nominations were revised on EOG 
Resources:

Meter #  Orig Nom Rev Nom Deal #

5263  4,755  5,820  126355
6067  3,726  4,600  126281
6748  2,005  3,300  126360
6742  4,743  10,120  126365
6296  5,733  2,300  126281

Bob





Daren J Farmer
05/31/2000 05:51 PM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Revised Nomination - June, 2000  

Bob, 

Go ahead and accept the nom revision.  I believe that this is with PGE, not 
El Paso.  How do the rest of our noms compare with EOG?  I f they have a 
higher volume at another meter than we do, I would like to increase our nom 
there.  In effect, I want to keep our physical index position as close as 
possible to what we have in the system now.

D


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Robert Cotten                           05/31/2000 04:04 PM
	

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Revised Nomination - June, 2000

Daren,

Charlotte Hawkins is having trouble confirming the volume of 5,733 with El 
Paso.  El Paso will not confirm the volume that high.  EOG revised their 
nomination as follows:

C/P Name Meter #  Orig Nom Rev Nom

EOG Res. 6296  5,733  2,300

Will you approve revising the volume in Unify down to 2,300?  Please advise.  
Thanks.

Bob