Greetings:
I'm assuming that Washington/Houston has this covered, but if there's 
anything I can do to assist, don't hesitate.
Best,
Jeff



	Susan J Mara
	07/26/2001 11:42 AM
		 
		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Transwestern Hearing

Hey, time to join the fun at FERC!!!

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/26/2001 09:42 AM -----

	Rebecca W Cantrell/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/26/2001 08:08 AM
		 
		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Transwestern Hearing

Here,s a little more detail on the issues that FERC wants to explore with 
regard to the Transwestern negotiated deals:

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index 
published : July 26, 2001
FERC Targets Transwestern for Market-Power Hearing 
FERC called for a hearing to determine whether Transwestern Pipeline 
exercised market power when it awarded negotiated-rate contracts that led to 
shippers being charged up to $27/MMBtu last February, when the firm 
transportation rate to the California border was only 38 cents/MMBtu. 
That was "70 times the recourse rate," said Commissioner Linda Breathitt, who 
called the matter up for discussion at the Commission's regular meeting. 
"Thirty-eight cents versus $27, that's a big difference in prices and we 
ought to be looking at that," responded Commissioner William Massey. 
"...[W]e believe closer scrutiny of transactions that provide the opportunity 
to impose rates many multiples in excess of maximum approved tariff rates is 
necessary, especially in light of our serious concern regarding the high 
prices for natural gas in California relative to prices in the rest of the 
country and their consequential effect on wholesale electricity prices in 
California," the order noted [RP97-288-009]. 
FERC's action was in response to a show cause order it issued in March, 
directing Transwestern to explain how it had firm capacity available on its 
pipeline to move gas under the negotiated-rate transactions, and why its 
actions in entering into the negotiated-rate agreements didn't violate 
Commission regulations and policy regarding firm transportation service and 
negotiated-rate agreements. 
FERC's order requires Transwestern to make certain changes to the posting of 
daily capacity. "I'm satisfied that this should take care of the issue 
prospectively," Breathitt said. But with respect to the negotiated 
agreements, "our order today establishes a hearing of limited scope on a 
fast-track basis to determine whether Transwestern exercised market power in 
awarding these...contracts." 
It directs an administrative law judge to convene a pre-hearing conference 
within 10 days, and issue an initial decision on the matter within 60 days. 
The hearing will focus on three issues: 1) whether Transwestern capacity was 
advertised and awarded in a fair manner; 2) whether the rates negotiated were 
the result of the exercise of market power; and 3) why the capacity awarded 
was available without interruption while recourse service was not available. 
"In addition, I have a question [as to] why shippers agreed to such rates 
when much lower recourse rates should have been available under our 
negotiated rate program," Breathitt said. 
The shippers that entered into the negotiated-rate transactions with 
Transwestern include Richardson Products Co., Sempra Energy Trading Corp., BP 
Energy Co., Astra Power LLC and Reliant Energy Services.