The name is PPL ENPLUS which I believe is short for PPL Energy Plus.  I 
purchased 4,752 dt on TRANSCO.  The primary receipt point is CNG-Leidy and 
the primary delivery point is Mainline BG&E.  The offer number is 21575-001.

I feel comfortable that the points listed above are the primary receipt and 
delivery points because of our relationship with Penn Fuel.  Following is the 
example Judy and I discussed with Transco.


EXAMPLE
Assume PSE&G has 100,000 dt of telescoped capacity with a primary delivery 
point of PSE&G, downstream of Linden.  ENA purchases 20,000 dt of telescoped 
capacity from PSE&G under the following scenarios;

1.PSE&G released the capacity with PSE&G as the delivery point.
ENA has primary rights of 20,000 to PSE&G and secondary rights of 20,000 to 
New York (no change, same as before).

ENA could flow 20,000 from the Gulf to BG&E (upstream of the Linden and the 
Leidy Line) on a primary basis.  AND 20,000 from Nat Fuel-Leidy to PSE&G 
which is secondary on the Leidy Line, and Primary on the mainline to PSE&G.  
AND 20,000 from Tenn-Rivervale to BUG on a secondary basis.  These paths are 
not overlapping and ENA could effectivly schedule





   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           09/06/2000 08:24 PM
	

To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Re: Transco capacity issue  

Colleen/Chris:  I'm working from memory here, but I'm pretty sure that the 
new Order 637 reporting requirements require the Index of Customers to list 
the primary receipt and delivery points.  However, in checking the FERC web 
site, the pipelines are only required to update the Index of Customers 
quarterly.  Therefore, the indices filed under the new reporting requirements 
won't be out until early October.  I will look into this more closely when I 
get back.

Chris -- Is your Penn Fuel release on Transco or Tennessee?  I couldn't find 
"Penn Fuel" on either the Transco or Tennessee Index of Customers as of 
7/1/00.  Do they have another "legal" name?

P.S.  Here in western North Carolina, the high today was about 70 degrees.  
It's sure going to be rough coming back to 100.  But I understand y'all will 
have a cool spell tomorrow.  It's supposed to be way down to 92!!  We'll be 
warming up to about 72.  


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           09/06/2000 08:30 AM
	

To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Transco capacity issue

Becky--please read Chris' e-mail below.  I have not talked with him yet about 
it (I just got the message), but I'll get with him and then we can discuss 
this further.
---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000 
08:28 AM ---------------------------


Chris Germany
09/05/2000 12:16 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan 
Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  
Subject: Transco capacity issue

With the change in segmentation rules on Transco, it has become much more 
critical to know the primary receipt and delivery points for the capacity we 
are buying.  Mr. Goodell said that Tennessee's EBB will indicate if the 
points on the capacity you are buying are secondary or primary.  I would 
prefer to know the actual primary points on the contract, especially the 
delivery points.

I just bought some Z6-Z6 capacity from Penn Fuel for the balance of the 
month.  Steve Gillespie verified that Penn Fuel released the primary receipt 
and delivery point on the contract.  But, I'm taking Penn Fuel's word for it 
and I am unable to verify the information myself.  It could have a big impact 
on what we flow in Z6.

Colleen, can we do anything about this through the regulatory process?  Let 
me know if you need specific capacity examples.