This is an easy one.  1400 Smith, EB3803B.

Thanks!

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Hudson, Roeline" <HudsonR@teai.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hudson+2C+20Roeline+22+20+3CHudsonR+40teai+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:28 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: Fee Letter

Hi -

You didn't think you would away today without another e-mail from me, did
you???? (just joking)

When I courier these documents over to you tomorrow I will send them to 1400
Smith Street, but don't I have to put in a building number or room number
for you in order that it will get to you for sure?  Let me know what that is
-

Thanks,
Until tomorrow,
Roeline




> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Marie.Heard@enron.com [SMTP:Marie.Heard@enron.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:28 PM
> To:	HudsonR@teai.com
> Subject:	RE: Fee Letter
>
> Hi, Roeline:
>
> We would prefer to sign the fee letter at the same time we sign the
> assignments.  Yes, we will sign enough originals of all documents so that
> all parties can have an original.
>
> Hopefully we can get this wrapped up tomorrow, as I will be out of the
> office Friday.
>
> Marie
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Hudson, Roeline" <HudsonR@teai.com>@ENRON
>
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hudson+2C+20Roeline+22+20+3CHudsonR+40teai+2Ecom+3E+
> 40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>
>    Sent:   Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:26 PM
>    To:     Heard, Marie
>    Subject:  RE: Fee Letter
>
>    Marie -
>
>    One more question - I received some of these in duplicate, and some of
>    them
>    were original only.  Like the Termination Agreement that you just
>    couriered
>    over to me - I only got one original from you, and there are two
>    signatures.
>    We would like to have an original signature as well - so are we going
> to
>    do
>    this after the fact?  That would be okay by me, because I want to have
>    them
>    all signed and off my desk - so just let me know how you think we
> should
>    do
>    this.
>
>    Thanks, Marie -
>    Roeline
>
>
>    > -----Original Message-----
>    > From:      Marie.Heard@enron.com [SMTP:Marie.Heard@enron.com]
>    > Sent:      Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:32 PM
>    > To:   HudsonR@teai.com
>    > Cc:   Russell.Diamond@enron.com
>    > Subject:   RE: Fee Letter
>    >
>    > Hi, Roeline!
>    >
>    > I'm sending the original revised Termination Agreement over to you
>    this
>    > afternoon.  Let me know if you have any questions or need anything
>    else.
>    >
>    > Marie
>    >
>    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    From:   "Hudson, Roeline" <HudsonR@teai.com>@ENRON
>    >
>    >
>
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hudson+2C+20Roeline+22+20+3CHudsonR+40teai+2Ecom+3E+
>    > 40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>    >
>    >
>    >    Sent:   Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:52 AM
>    >    To:     Heard, Marie
>    >    Subject:  RE: Fee Letter
>    >
>    >    Hi Marie,
>    >
>    >    The fee letter looks good - and I have all of the paperwork here,
>    > except
>    >    of
>    >    course the Termination letter for ENA Deal #0619, which you
>    indicated
>    >    the
>    >    Confirmation Desk was workin on.  So things look good to go.
>    >
>    >    I have the paperwork back from both Dynegy and Sempra, but United
>    Oil's
>    >    letters is being reviewed by its lawyer today.  He was away for
> the
>    > past
>    >    two
>    >    days.  As soon as I have everything together I will courier the
>    > complete
>    >    package to you - one detail that I forgot to mention - right now I
>    have
>    >    fax
>    >    copies only, and I hope it will suffice until I can get original
>    >    signatures.
>    >    If it does not, then we are in real trouble!!  So say it is okay -
>    and
>    > I
>    >    will work on the originals after the deal is completed.
>    >
>    >    Thanks for all your help, Marie.
>    >
>    >    Roeline
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >    > -----Original Message-----
>    >    > From:      Heard, Marie [SMTP:Marie.Heard@ENRON.com]
>    >    > Sent:      Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:51 AM
>    >    > To:   hudsonr@teai.com
>    >    > Cc:   Diamond, Russell
>    >    > Subject:   Fee Letter
>    >    >
>    >    > Hi, Roeline!
>    >    >
>    >    > Attached for your review is a draft of the proposed fee letter
> in
>    >    > connection with the assignments and terminations.  Please let me
>    know
>    >    if
>    >    > you have any comments.
>    >    >
>    >    > Our Confirmation Desk is in the process of revising the
>    termination
>    > of
>    >    > ENA Deal No. NL0619.1 to delete the fee reference, and I will
>    forward
>    >    it
>    >    > to you when ready.
>    >    >
>    >    > Please let me know when you have signoff on the other documents
>    and I
>    >    > will finalize and have executed by ENA and forward to you.
>    >    >
>    >    > Thanks!
>    >    >
>    >    > Marie
>    >    >
>    >    >
>    >    >             <<060ltr (torch).doc>>
>    >    >
>    >    >
>    >    >
>    >
> **********************************************************************
>    >    > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
>    >    affiliate
>    >    > and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
> sole
>    use
>    >    of
>    >    > the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
>    >    disclosure by
>    >    > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>    recipient
>    >    (or
>    >    > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
>    sender
>    > or
>    >    > reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
>    and
>    >    > delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
>    attachments
>    >    hereto)
>    >    > are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
>    create
>    >    or
>    >    > evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp.
>    (or
>    >    any of
>    >    > its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
>    and
>    > may
>    >    not
>    >    > be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
>    >    > otherwise. Thank you.
>    >    >
>    >
> **********************************************************************
>    >    <<
>    >    > File: 060ltr (torch).doc >>