NO !!! Thank God!!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Van Hooser, Steve  
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 11:54 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	FW: Gulf Canada Resources - Deal #821869

Debra,

Does this kind of thing go on alot?

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richardson, Stacey  
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.; Dozier, Scott; Hernandez, Elizabeth L.; Van Hooser, Steve; Perlingiere, Debra
Cc:	Johnson, Cheryl; Anderson, Bridgette; Campos, Anthony; Gonzales, Sharon
Subject:	FW: Gulf Canada Resources - Deal #821869

My apologies.  I meant to say deal 821869.  Thanks for the correction, Scott!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dozier, Scott  
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 11:41 AM
To:	Richardson, Stacey
Subject:	RE: Gulf Canada Resources - Deal #821869

Just to clarify - 821869 is the affected deal.  872869 is a Conoco deal.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richardson, Stacey  
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 11:34 AM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.; Dozier, Scott; Hernandez, Elizabeth L.; Van Hooser, Steve; Perlingiere, Debra
Cc:	Johnson, Cheryl; Anderson, Bridgette; Campos, Anthony; Gonzales, Sharon
Subject:	FW: Gulf Canada Resources - Deal #821869

OK guys, I think we have it all figured out now.  Deal 872869 is truly a Crestar deal but the deal should have been input under Crestar Energy Marketing Corp. instead of Crestar Energy Inc. (which is now Gulf Canada Resources Limited).  Elizabeth has moved the deal to Crestar Energy Marketing Corp. and the right contract is now attached.  Crestar will now be paid under Crestar Energy Marketing Corp.  as they have billed us.  

I hope this clears up any confusion.  Please feel free to call me at x30569 if you should have any questions.

Thanks,
SBR

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dozier, Scott  
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:43 PM
To:	Richardson, Stacey; Mims, Patrice L.
Cc:	Hernandez, Elizabeth L.; Johnson, Cheryl
Subject:	RE: Gulf Canada Resources - Deal #821869

Stacey - Let me add that Crestar is continuing to bill us under Crestar Energy Marketing.  So, they may need to be brought in the loop.

Thank you,
Scott
5-7213

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richardson, Stacey  
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:26 PM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Cc:	Hernandez, Elizabeth L.; Dozier, Scott; Johnson, Cheryl
Subject:	FW: Gulf Canada Resources - Deal #821869

Patrice,

An update for you - Steve Van Hooser took this over from Dan but he is out of the office today.  I left a message on his voice mail and will let you know as soon as I hear from him.  I will request copies of the documentation from the Global Counterparty group in the meantime (Cheryl, can you send me a copy ASAP?).

Will keep you posted.

Thanks,
SBR x30569

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mims, Patrice L.  
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 10:26 AM
To:	Richardson, Stacey
Subject:	RE: Gulf Canada Resources - Deal #821869

Oh my.....where is Dan Hyvl? we spent a great deal of time on scrubbing this issue down.  Let me get with Stacey!

I'll get back with you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richardson, Stacey  
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 9:43 AM
To:	Hernandez, Elizabeth L.
Cc:	Dozier, Scott; Mims, Patrice L.; Nemec, Gerald; Dickson, Stacy E.
Subject:	RE: Gulf Canada Resources - Deal #821869

I'm not sure what Dan's rationale was, but he's no longer here to ask.  Maybe we can have Gerald Nemec or Stacy Dickson Granmayeh look into it.  My documentation shows that Crestar Energy Inc. became Gulf Canada Resources Limited due to an amalgamation effective 03/01/01.  I don't have the documentation in hand but I can get a copy from the Global Counterparty group if necessary.  I don't understand why the deal should remain Crestar unless it's really under a Crestar entity that may not have been affected by the amalgamation????

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hernandez, Elizabeth L.  
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:11 AM
To:	Richardson, Stacey
Subject:	FW: Gulf Canada Resources - Deal #821869

Should deal 821869 be moved to Crestar?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dozier, Scott  
Sent:	Monday, July 16, 2001 8:37 AM
To:	Hernandez, Elizabeth L.
Subject:	FW: Gulf Canada Resources - Deal #821869

fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mims, Patrice L.  
Sent:	Monday, July 16, 2001 8:23 AM
To:	Dozier, Scott
Subject:	RE: Gulf Canada Resources - Deal #821869

Per Dan Hyvl, everything should be and will remain under Crestar.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dozier, Scott  
Sent:	Monday, July 16, 2001 8:09 AM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Cc:	Hernandez, Elizabeth L.
Subject:	Gulf Canada Resources - Deal #821869

Patrice,

Should deal 821869 be booked under Gulf Canada Resources Limited or should it change to Crestar Energy Marketing Corp.?  Is there a point at which these deals will permanently remain under Gulf Canada Resources?  If not, can all future deals be moved over to Crestar Energy Marketing Corp.?  Please advise.

Thank you,
Scott Dozier
Enron Wholesale Services
Client Services - Settlements
office: 713.345.7213
fax: 713.646.8420
email: scott.dozier@enron.com