I just sent this to you 

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/03/2001 11:14 AM -----

	"Dan Douglass" <douglass@energyattorney.com>
	07/03/2001 10:58 AM
		 
		 To: <Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>, "Bill Chen" <bchen@newenergy.com>
		 cc: <stevan.allen@edelman.com>, <arem@electric.com>, <doao@chevron.com>, 
<tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>, <megan.beiser@edelman.com>, 
<rmorgan@newenergy.com>, <jami.warner@edelman.com>, <nplotkin@rcsis.com>
		 Subject: Re: FW: Investor Memo - Timetable Update


Bill, the only date I have heard for issuance of a decision is July 12.  As
for the effective date, I wrote to Ann Watson and Linda Serizawa pointing
out that a retroactive suspension of DA would be extremely problematical to
ESPs and probably cause complaints to be filed by customers who had signed
in good faith.  It was then suggested that the effective date should be
subsequent to whatever date a decision is issued.  Watson responded
indicating agreement but pointing out that it was Wood, not Bilas, who was
suspending DA and that Serizawa needed to respond.  Serizawa's only response
was to remind me that the email was an ex parte contact and needed to be
filed, which I already knew, of course.  However, she did not respond on the
issue (why am I not surprised?).

By the way, the memo you discuss in your email was not attached to the
version I received.

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Chen" <bchen@newenergy.com>
To: <Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>
Cc: <stevan.allen@edelman.com>; <arem@electric.com>; <doao@chevron.com>;
<tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>; <megan.beiser@edelman.com>;
<rmorgan@newenergy.com>; <jami.warner@edelman.com>; <nplotkin@rcsis.com>;
<douglass@energyattorney.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: FW: Investor Memo - Timetable Update


> In my reading of the attached memo, it appears that the PUC now won't act
> to suspend DA until mid-August.  Do we have independent confirmation from
> any sources in the PUC, Governor's office or Legislature?  If suspension
> is adopted, will it be retroactive to July 1?  I'm assuming that will be
> the case.
>
> Bill
>
> Erica.Manuel@edelman.com writes:
> >I just received this document from Angelides' office - it's a memo
> >outlining
> >a revised timetable for the PUC actions required for the bond sale. FYI.
> >EM.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Philip Angelides, Calif State Treasurer
> >[mailto:philip_angelides@treasurer.ca.gov]
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 7:38 AM
> >To: FITZPATRICK, Charles
> >Subject: Investor Memo - Timetable Update
> >
> >
> >Please note the update regarding the State of California DWR Power Bonds
> >provided in the attached memo.
> >
> > <<Investor Memo -- Timetable Update 7-2-01.pdf>>
> >
> >If you have any questions, please contact Charles Fitzpatrick at (800)
> >900-3873.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>