I may be wrong, but I believe the version sent to day is the same one I sent 
to Rose, Lisa et al on April 24.

Kay




"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 05/01/2001 12:40:33 PM
To: "Williams, Bill" <Bill.Williams@enron.com>, "Mann, Kay" 
<Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "THOMAS CONSTANTINE" <TCONSTAN@LLGM.COM>
cc: "Rasmussen, Dale" <Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com>, "Engeldorf, Roseann" 
<Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com>, "Bills, Lisa" <Lisa.Bills@enron.com> 

Subject: RE: LV Co Gen

I have already incorporated Lee's comment in a new Version 7.  I am just
waiting for any additional comments. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Bill [mailto:Bill.Williams@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Mann, Kay; THOMAS CONSTANTINE
Cc: Rasmussen, Dale; Thompson, Peter J.; Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: LV Co Gen


Kay - I just checked the April 24th draft.  The addition is not there
now, and it need to be.  By this e mail, Tom and Peter, please
incorporate those comments. 

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:    Mann, Kay  
> Sent:   Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:12 AM
> To:   THOMAS CONSTANTINE
> Cc:   Mann, Kay; Williams, Bill; Rasmussen, Dale; pthompson@akllp.com;
> Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
> Subject:   RE: LV Co Gen
> 
> 
> I sent this email from GE to Dale/Bill after I received it.  Since
> Peter's last draft was April 24, I'm I assume this wasn't included:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Kay/Bill,
> 
> Bill says he agrees and accepts our comments to the A&A.
> 
> One change required to the Rev 5 document.  In Exhibit B, Add item
> "27)One
> additional Human Machine Interface (HMI) per Unit (desktop PC type)"
> 
> Include these changes and we can get this done tomorrow.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lee