Agree wholeheartedly.




"Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com> on 03/23/2001 03:13:37 PM
To: <Alan.Comnes@enron.com>, <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>
cc: <Chris.H.Foster@enron.com>, <Christian.Yoder@enron.com>, 
<Christopher.F.Calger@enron.com>, <David.Leboe@enron.com>, 
<David.Parquet@enron.com>, <dbenevid@enron.com>, <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, 
<James.D.Steffes@enron.com>, <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>, 
<Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, 
<John.J.Lavorato@enron.com>, <Karen.Denne@enron.com>, 
<Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, <Mark.Palmer@enron.com>, <Mary.Hain@enron.com>, 
<nbresnan@enron.com>, <Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com>, <Ray.Alvarez@enron.com>, 
<Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>, <Richard.Shapiro@enron.com>, 
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, <steve.hall@enron.com>, 
<Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, 
<Tim.Heizenrader@enron.com> 

Subject: Re: Today's ISO Filings in Response to FERC Staff's Mitigation Plan

I recommend that we consider filing a motion for summary rejection of the 
ISO's proposal on the ground that it is the product of an illegal board 
seated in violation of FERC's governance orders that is a highly politicized 
tool of Governor Davis, rather than an independent body.  In addition to the 
legal arguments for dismissal, we could also rebut the ISO's economic and 
market analysis.