Our current assumption is that we cannot file this Answer in Opposition until 
the automatic stay is modified.  We sent this draft out yesterday evening 
that so we could get the OK from all the parties joining this answer, so that 
we could be in a position to file as soon as the stay is modified.

>>> "Perlman, David M" <David.Perlman@powersrc.com> 03/16/01 09:11AM >>>
Kim-- how does this relate to the CalPx bankruptcy? Does the automatic stay
affect this? I would like to check with bankruptcy counsel?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kimberly Curry [mailto:kcurry@bracepatt.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 7:24 PM
To: dvermillion@avistaenergy.com; rreilley@coral-energy.com;
mhain@ect.enron.com; smara@enron.com; snovose@enron.com;
kzeitlin@mofo.com; rloeffler@mofo.com; jmcgrane@morganlewis.com;
john.fryer@pacificorp.com; timothy.bolden@pinnaclewest.com;
dmperlman@powersrc.com; rosteen@powersrc.com; paramfjord@stoel.com;
rcjosephson@stoel.com; sjkaplan@stoel.com; gdb@vnf.com; hes@vnf.com
Subject: Answer in Opposition


All:

Attached is a draft of our Answer in Opposition to the PX's February 26
Request for Clarification, on in the Alternative, Request for Rehearing, of
FERC's Feb. 14 Order Rejecting its proposal to relax its creditworthiness
requirements.  If you have any comments or revisions, please let me know as
soon as possible.  You may contact me by return email, or by phone at (202)
828-7623.

Kim