TK, FYI, let me know if you think otherwise.  

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buchanan, John  
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:10 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Kowalke, Terry; Watson, Kimberly; Hanagriff, Richard; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Cc:	January, Steve
Subject:	RE: Sid Richardson Fuel OBA issue

If the fuel is being nominated and scheduled the only volumes hitting the OBA are the diff. between scheduled and actual and that is what the OBA's are for as long as it is not being abused.

John Buchanan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn  
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:08 AM
To:	Kowalke, Terry; Buchanan, John; Watson, Kimberly; Hanagriff, Richard; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Cc:	January, Steve
Subject:	RE: Sid Richardson Fuel OBA issue

	FYI.  Is everyone comfortable that we are NOT creating an imbalance with Sid
	Richardson due to fuel?  Just want to be sure we should not check out any
	additional information.  Terry, thanks for your prompt reply.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kowalke, Terry  
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:03 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Buchanan, John; Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	Sid Richardson Fuel OBA issue

In the OBA meeting held today 01/03/02. Is the fuel being nominated or not at the Sid Richardson point #500395 or L.E. 8729? Yes it is and has been nominated as far back as I can retrieve information in TMS. The point came active in 12/1995 and remains active today. It is also part of their main OBA contract #21758. According to the information in CBS it was nominated and scheduled back then also. If there is more information or questions, please let me know. Thank you. 

Terry Kowalke