I thought so too, but was overruled by PR --he was not! kd....but, it is being revised modestly with a one page message sheet added.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kean, Steven J.  
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 4:21 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	FW: Letter to Dunn, et al


Letter looks good to me.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alamo, Joseph  
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:37 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; skean@enron.com
Subject:	Letter to Dunn, et al


see attached.
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 08/01/2001 09:31 AM ---------------------------
From:	Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/01/2001 12:28 AM CDT
To:	steve.kean@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, rick.shapiro@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, james.steffes@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, richard.sanders@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate, susan.mara@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Maureen McVicker/ENRON@enronXgate, Ginger Dernehl/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	 

Subject:	Letter to Dunn, et al

Attached is a draft of the letter to discuss on tomorrow's call.  Joseph, please re-email to everyone to ensure they've received it, since I got transferred to outlook tonite and am uncertain about emailing.  Thanks.
 
Best,
Jeff
 
 
 
  << File: Dunn letter 0731.doc >>