Brant:
Do you have any thoughts on Point #2?  Do you care if we limit the cross 
default provisions to just the Credit Support Providers and not both the 
Credit Support providers and the counterparties?
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000 08:38 AM -----

	"Shuttee, John" <ShutteeJ@EPEnergy.com>
	05/23/2000 11:23 AM
		 
		 To: "'Carol St Clair'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc: "Shuttee, John" <ShutteeJ@EPEnergy.com>
		 Subject: RE: Cross Default Language


Carol -

Our legal department is in the process of reviewing the schedule, paragraph
13, and L/C provisions/schedule.  I will send you new drafts once I
incorporate comments from them. Two other things:
1.  Enclosed is a "new" format of Guarantee for your review.  Actually, this
should be similar to the 1995/6 version Enron has already accepted.
2.  I disagree with your changes in C/D threshold discussed below.   We
prefer to limit this to the Credit Support Provider (as per your original
change) as this is who guarantees the ISDA.  I have incorporated your
original comments with little change which you can review when I send the
drafts.

John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carol St Clair [SMTP:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 5:21 PM
> To: Shuttee, John
> Subject: Cross Default Language
>
>
>
> John:
> Please see the enclosed attachment.  If we go with this language then you
> can
> ignore my comments to Part 1 (c) and (e) of the Schedule.
>
> (See attached file: El Paso Cross Default Threshold.doc)
> Carol St. Clair
> EB 3892
> 713-853-3989 (Phone)
> 713-646-3393 (Fax) << File: Mac Word 3.0 >>


******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************