Not sure yet.  We will be talking with AReM and will want your input.  We may have to file but not sure.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huddleson, Diann  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:01 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Re: FW: A.98-07-003 et al. JOINT PROPOSAL OF THE UTILITIES TO IMPLEMENT THE COMMISSION'S SUSPENSION OF DIRECT ACCESS FILED TODAY

Jim, Sue Mara said that Dan Douglas would be making the response to this  and asked me to review since she is on vacation.   Did Enron decide to file separate comments?



From:	James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/19/2001 10:32 AM
To:	Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Richter/ENRON@enronXgate, Lamar Frazier/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/ENRON@enronxgate, Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen Swain/ENRON@enronXgate, Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate, Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/ENRON@enronxgate, Kevin Keeney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/ENRON@enronXgate 
Subject:	FW: A.98-07-003 et al. JOINT PROPOSAL OF THE UTILITIES TO IMPLEMENT THE COMMISSION'S SUSPENSION OF DIRECT ACCESS FILED TODAY

Attached is the most recent statement from the California Utilities that implements the DA Suspension (filed Friday). Comments are due Nov 28 (Wed) from parties.  

The Utilities continue push for a "hard" deadline of DA.  They also offer an option where Suppliers would be required to submit a Affidavit for incremental DASRs and potentially have the CPUC review the specific contract language.  Of course, in no event do they believe that any customer should be allowed to have DA service if the customer's name was not on our Oct 5 Customer List.

Jeff and I will be talking with Mike Smith (and anyone else who wants to participate) to work through our response to these comments.

Jim


-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff 
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:10 AM
To: Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: A.98-07-003 et al. JOINT PROPOSAL OF THE UTILITIES TO
IMPLEMENT THE COMMISSION'S SUSPENSION OF DIRECT ACCESS FILED TODAY


	

-----Original Message-----
From: JBennett [mailto:JBennett@GMSSR.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 6:52 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Sue Mara (E-mail)
Subject: FW: A.98-07-003 et al. JOINT PROPOSAL OF THE UTILITIES TO
IMPLEMENT THE COMMISSION'S SUSPENSION OF DIRECT ACCESS FILED TODAY



Attached is the joint proposal of the UDCs. We must file comments on
November 28th 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Molina, Rachel [mailto:RMolina@Sempra.com]
> Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 4:40 PM
> To:	abb@eslawfirm.com; adf@cpuc.ca.gov; beth.fox@sce.com;
> bfinkelstein@turn.org; bgex@skjerven.com; BJulian2@aol.com;
> btenney@landuselaw.com.; cjb@cpuc.ca.gov; dclark@sempra.com;
> dlf@cpuc.ca.gov; douglass@energyattorney.com; edwardoneill@dwt.com;
> ek@a-klaw.com; fdeleon@energy.state.ca.us;
> furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil; hal@cpuc.ca.gov; jbennett@gmssr.com;
> jgl@cpuc.ca.gov; jlkm@pge.com; jlondon@gralegal.com; kmccrea@sablaw.com;
> kmills@cfbf.com; kth@cpuc.ca.gov; ktilton@gralegal.com; lmh@eslawfirm.com;
> lss@cpuc.ca.gov; mer@cpuc.ca.gov; mFerrara@apsc.com; mgomez1@bart.gov;
> mpa@a-klaw.com; mshames@ucan.org; napedersen@jonesday.com;
> phanschen@mofo.com; pstohr@dbsr.com; rab@cpuc.ca.gov;
> rclark@coral-energy.com; shotwejp@sce.com; sjy@cpuc.ca.gov;
> wbooth@booth-law.com; blaising@braunlegal.com; jbarthrop@electric.com;
> jguzman@nossaman.com; jsqueri@gmssr.com; kmcspadd@milbank.com;
> lwhouse@el-dorado.ca.us; mmattes@nossaman.com; omv@cpuc.ca.gov; Parrott,
> Jeff; sberlin@mccarthylaw.com; yee@cpuc.ca.gov
> Cc:	Szymanski, Paul
> Subject:	A.98-07-003 et al. JOINT PROPOSAL OF THE UTILITIES TO
> IMPLEMENT THE COMMISSION'S SUSPENSION OF DIRECT ACCESS FILED TODAY
> 
> 	 <<98-07-003 joint proposal(v1).DOC>>  <<98-07-003 Attachment
> A(v1).DOC>> 
> 
> This filing was made today at the CPUC's San Diego Office. << File: 98-07-003 joint proposal(v1).DOC >>  << File: 98-07-003 Attachment A(v1).DOC >>