9.6  Additional Factory Testing
.  In the event that Purchaser reasonably determines that a factory test 
conducted by Seller or its Subcontractors was not conducted properly or the 
results of the test were inconclusive Purchaser may required Seller to repeat 
such test in a fashion as to obtain conclusive results.  

Purchaser may request Seller or its Subcontractors to  perform one or more of 
its factory  tests using more precise instrumentation than planned, or 
conduct a test not in Seller,s or its Subcontractor,s standard factory test 
program.  In the case of a Purchaser request for an additional non standard 
factory test the conduct of such test shall be subject to mutual agreement by 
the parties.  

In the event as a result of such Purchaser requested repeat test, ormore 
precise instrumentation or non standard test  the Equipment is found to not 
be compliant with the requirements of this Agreement, Seller shall correct 
such noncompliance and the cost and time associated with such testing shall 
be to Seller,s account.  If the Equipment is found to be compliant with this 
Agreement, Seller shall be eligible for a Change Orderfor the cost and time 
associated with such testing.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/21/2001 12:27 
PM ---------------------------


John G Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/17/2001 05:13 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott 
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B 
Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, pthompson@akllp.com, Scott 
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John 
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: World Hunger- Section 9.6 Additional tests

Per the conference call of Wednesday, I revised Section 9.6 (with Scott 
fixing my drafting).  Attached document contains a redline of the section.

I think this can be included in the version that goes to GE.  I discussed the 
concept with Jim Sutherland- he agreed with relaxing the unilateral 
requirement in the case of GE.  We would not want to do this in the case of 
other vendors.