Christi - I think your two suggested solutions with environmental 
implications are probably doable.  The issue with retrofitting and burning 
fuel oil is going to be the fact that fuel oil has greater emissions and thus 
more offsets will be needed.  The repowering/increasing of efficiency at 
existing generation I believe has been addressed in the just signed SBX 28.





Christi L Nicolay@ECT
05/23/2001 02:27 PM
To: Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ban 
Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Jeff 
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray 
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nancy Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Janel 
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Miller/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary 
Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna 
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Re: Talking points on gas in CA  

Some comments, including a couple environmental ideas (that may not be 
feasible--please check).



Jennifer Thome@ENRON
05/23/2001 08:13 AM
To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ban 
Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe 
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nancy 
Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron 

Subject: Talking points on gas in CA

Becky and Christi:

Attached are revised talking points on natural gas in CA.  I have made 
revisions to reflect our discussion yesterday (e.g., no price caps, basis 
differential is not explained by transportation costs, etc.).

As discussed, I hope to get input from the gas fundamentals group tomorrow 
and finalize this document by Friday.

I welcome your feedback.

Jennifer
5-3550