This SHOULD be it.  Please circulate, including Lee.

Thanks once again,

Kay




"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com> on 04/12/2001 08:13:02 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com> 

Subject: RE: Revised Salmon Agreement

I will make these changes this morning. Do you want me to circulate the
revised draft once these changes are incorporated, or are we expecting
more comments?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:09 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: Revised Salmon Agreement


2nd of 2.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2001
03:08
PM ---------------------------


lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/09/2001 05:55:57 PM

To:   kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
cc:   kay.mann@enron.com

Subject:  Revised Salmon Agreement


Kent/Kay-

I've redline the Salmon contract for Exhibits A and B, Purchase Amount,
Maximum Liability Amount, and Unit Liability Amount.  The Power System
Stabilizer has been struck from scope, because I can recall Bill
Williams
advising that LV would need them, Delta/Salmon would not.  That's
consitent
with the other units going to CA (w/ Intergen).

Regards,

Lee <<Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy
Agreement_ljredline040901.DOC>>

(See attached file: Comparison of Versions 2 to 3 of Salmon Energy
Agreement_ljredline040901.DOC)