Do you know what this is about?   Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 10/16/2000 11:17 AM -----

	George McClellan
	04/11/2000 02:45 PM
		
		 To: Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Force Majeur Claim - Fiddlers Ferry Unit 2

Rogue cargo?  What the hell!



Stuart Staley
04/11/2000 09:43 AM
To: Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Force Majeur Claim - Fiddlers Ferry Unit 2


Robert - is this legit?

George - the beat goes on


---------------------- Forwarded by Stuart Staley/LON/ECT on 11/04/2000 15:38 
---------------------------
   
	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
	
	From:  MCrosland@edisonmission.com                           11/04/2000 14:53
	

To: Stuart.Staley@enron.com
cc: Peter.Bradley@enron.com, "LondonFuels" <LondonFuels@edisonmission.com> 

Subject: Force Majeur Claim - Fiddlers Ferry Unit 2




Stu,
I am sure you will be aware from your market intelligence of the problems at 
FF
Unit 2, which we are advised is an event of Force Majeur. I believe it would 
be
counter-productive to the spirit of current negotiations to prosecute an FM
claim and do not therefore propose to do so at this time. However, in the 
event
of an unsatisfactory outcome to these negotiations we do reserve the right to
ultimately pursue a Force Majeur claim in respect of the failure of FF Unit 2.
I am also holding back FF's claim for mill damage from the rogue cargo of hard
La Loma coal on the same principle.
Please respond if you disagree with this approach.
Regards
Max