Ok.  Lee just called and he's going to call Carl so why don't you talk to Lee
first to see where things stand and discuss the Haas thing.
Rob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdasovic@enron.com [SMTP:jdasovic@enron.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 1:56 PM
> To: gramlr@pjm.com
> Subject: RE: Draft program
>
>
> Do you mind if I meet with Carl and Severin and Rich next time I'm over at
> Haas to discuss this a bit with them?
>
>
>
>
> gramlr@pjm.com on 08/31/2000 07:27:25 AM
>
> To:   hcameron@uclink.berkeley.edu, gramlr@pjm.com,
>       whederman@columbiaenergygroup.com, doornbos@socrates.berkeley.edu,
>       amosher@appanet.org, lfried@uclink.berkeley.edu,
>       jeff.dasovich@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: Draft program
>
>
> Tomorrow at 4 EDT sounds good to me but I'm not sure we're ready.  I'd like
> to
> make sure all of our sponsors like the idea of coordinating with IBER and
> UCEI.
> What say you, sponsors?  The co-sponsorship decision affects our decisions
> on
> place, topics, and speakers, becase IBER and UCEI would need to get
> involved
> right away.
>
> I spoke with Borenstein last night.  Shapiro's initial idea was exactly
> what
> we're planning.  They appreciate and respect the fact that we've done most
> of
> the legwork.  They'd like to be part of it and it sounds like they would
> consider it a favor if we included them.  IBER has a subgroup called the
> Competition Policy Center which is a program meant to exploit the
> incredible
> concentration of antitrust economists at UC Berkeley.  I can certainly
> imagine
> ways the school could benefit from a stronger connection with CPC and UCEI,
> who
> are so widely respected and are doing public policy.  If Lee thinks its
> worth
> potentially losing a bit of limelight on this conference for the long run
> benefits of building resources and connections on campus, I'm all for it.
> Rob
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   Heather Cameron [SMTP:hcameron@uclink.berkeley.edu]
> > Sent:   Wednesday, August 30, 2000 6:48 PM
> > To:     gramlr@pjm.com; whederman@columbiaenergygroup.com;
> > doornbos@socrates.berkeley.edu; amosher@appanet.org;
> > lfried@uclink.berkeley.edu; jeff.dasovich@enron.com
> > Subject:     Re: Draft program
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > After listening to the various viewpoints and concerns expressed in our
> > last conference call, I believe that the panel options listed in Option 3
> > of Rob's draft might be most effective in producing the type of discourse
> > that we are seeking.
> >
> > I propose that we schedule a conference call for this Friday afternoon,
> > September 1, at 4PM EDT. I mentioned that I have reserved the Krutch
> > Theater (max.capacity 375) for the week of November 13-17. I have since
> > been informed that I can only hold the whole week through Wednesday,
> > September 6, therefore, it will be important to narrow the options down
> > very soon if we can.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Heather
> >
> >
> >
> > At 06:44 AM 8/30/00 -0400, gramlr@pjm.com wrote:
> > >Shall we try to talk again Monday?  I think I will talk to Borenstein to
> see
> > >what the Haas folks have in mind.
> > >
> > >I tried to capture everyone's comments.  Allen, you might want to
> explain
> > more
> > >about your panel suggestions since I didn't do them justice.  As you'll
> see I
> > >took the liberty of offering a new characterization of the panels that I
> > >didn't
> > >bring up on the call.  Everything on there is offered as a strawman to
> be
> > >criticized and changed.
> > >Rob <<Draft  program.doc>>
> > >
> > >Rob Gramlich
> > >PJM Market Monitoring Unit
> > >(610) 666-4291
> > >gramlr@pjm.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Heather Cameron, Events Coordinator
> > The Richard & Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy
> > University of California, Berkeley
> > 2607 Hearst Avenue
> > Berkeley, CA  94720
> > Tel: 510-642-9437
> > Fax: 510-643-9657
> > GSPP home page: http://gspp.berkeley.edu
>
>
>