It's changed.




Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/16/2001 01:26 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Re: apb  

can you ch 523878 to the 17th?






   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/16/2001 10:46 AM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: apb  

This deal is the same as all the others Carla Hoffman entered yesterday - in 
the interest of time, she entered all deals with a Saturday-Sunday mask in 
Deal Blotter. If the deals were on peak, she said it shouldn't matter that 
they were marked to flow both days, because Sunday is all off-peak hours. I 
explained this in a couple e-mails yesterday - I guess I got confused about 
who I told. Carla said she's done this before and it shouldn't be a problem. 
Please let me know if you agree with this. In my opinion, just taking the 
time to explain the discrepancy in the 10 or 12 deals that were entered this 
way actually took more time than it saved. What do you think?

Kate



Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/16/2001 06:36 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Re: apb  

what about this deal?





Kerri Thompson
02/15/2001 04:13 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: apb

523878

broker shows it for the 17th.