Power outages virtually assured 

By Steve Geissinger 
SACRAMENTO - If government was responding to blackouts like it would any 
other disaster - whether firestorm, flood, or quake - it would dispatch 
troops to a barren strip of the Central Valley. 
There, some lawmakers and energy experts say, an outfit such as the U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers would swiftly upgrade a transmission bottleneck, called 
Path 15, that virtually ensures rolling outages in the Bay Area and across 
Northern California this summer. 
Sure, the legislators and experts acknowledge, there are plenty of wildcards 
that could make the expected blackouts worse this summer - from heat waves to 
lax conservation, from generator breakdowns to plant construction delays. 
But no matter how lucky California gets, it will almost certainly suffer 
because of the Path 15 bottleneck that's played a central role in most of the 
rotating outages so far. The bottleneck prevents authorities from shipping 
power north from Southern California, which sometimes has a surplus supply of 
electricity. 
As things stand now, a fix, likely to cost at least $200 million and take two 
years, is mired in the uncertainty of the energy crisis itself. 
Few had heard of Path 15 until the energy crisis and its soaring wholesale 
power prices developed this winter, financially shattering utilities, 
triggering blackouts and forcing the state into the power buying business. 
To spread electricity throughout the West Coast, an electron freeway of sorts 
extends 1,200 miles between Washington state and Los Angeles. Three towering 
high-voltage transmission lines form that freeway, except in one place. 
The network, in the zone named Path 15 by engineers, narrows to two, 
500,000-volt lines stretching southeast from the Los Banos area for about 90 
miles to the Coalinga region. Parts of the bottleneck are visible to those 
traveling Interstate 5. 
In most of this year's rolling blackouts, the bottleneck has prevented the 
state's transmission grid manager from being able to transfer surplus south 
state power to Northern California. The California Independent System 
Operator, the state's grid manager, was forced to order rotating outages in 
only the northern portion of the state. 
The bottleneck also contributed to outages in the Bay Area last June. 
Ironically, the bottleneck could have worked in Northern California's favor 
this summer, helping the region retain surplus hydroelectric power that 
couldn't squeeze through the bottleneck. But dry conditions throughout the 
Northwest are curtailing that. 
In fact, the bottleneck will benefit power plant owners in the north because 
the scarcity of power will allow them to charge higher prices. At the same 
time, generators in the south may be harmed somewhat because they won't be 
able to get their electricity to more lucrative markets. 
To make matters worse, though new power plants to alleviate the crisis are 
planned both north and south of Path 15, more are planned south of the 
bottleneck. 
Although there is widespread agreement on the need for quick and bold action 
on the energy crisis in general and on Path 15 in particular, longtime plans 
to improve the bottleneck are now mired in complex energy-crisis politics and 
the myriad uncertainties of the Pacific Gas and Electric Co. bankruptcy. 
"We have to pretend like we just had an earthquake," Sen. Debra Bowen, 
D-Marina del Rey, said during a recent meeting of her Senate Energy Committee 
on the crisis. 
Sen. Jackie Speier, D-Daly City, immediately responded: "This is an 
earthquake." 
Assemblyman Phil Wyman, R-Tehachapi, who agrees there's a need for emergency 
actions as if "we're at war," believes that perhaps the Army Corps of 
Engineers would be the appropriate agency to tackle the problem with Path 15, 
owned by PG&E. 
He's authored a bill, thrown into limbo by PG&E's bankruptcy filing, that 
would earmark $10 million to pay for initial environmental reviews of the 
Path 15 upgrade. 
Path 15's two lines were typical when it was built in the 1960s. But over the 
years, various utilities have bolstered the rest of the transmission system. 
Although PG&E has studied adding an extra line, the utility held up because 
of cost and regulations that make the lines a poor investment. 
Meanwhile, energy use outpaced construction of the infrastructure to supply 
it. 
When PG&E went broke this year buying wholesale power at soaring rates and 
selling it as lower, capped retail rates, Gov. Gray Davis offered a rescue 
that included state acquisition of Path 15 and the rest of the roughly 30,000 
miles of high-voltage transmission lines owned by the state's investor-owned 
utilities. 
The Davis administration, as part of the proposal, joined PG&E in talking 
about Path 15 improvements. But then the utility opted instead to enter 
bankruptcy proceedings that have thrust the fate of the bottleneck into 
limbo. 
Utility officials said they are uncertain whether they will gain permission 
from the federal bankruptcy judge to proceed with the project or whether 
circumstances will allow it. 
Terry Winter, president of Cal-ISO, wonders whether "the bankruptcy court 
will, with its traditional focus on maximizing the value of the debtor's 
estate, recognize the criticality of allowing these investments to go 
forward." 
The Davis administration, moving toward acquisition of SoCal Edison's lines, 
is uncertain whether it will still have the opportunity to purchase the PG&E 
grid that includes Path 15. 
At the same time, a group of north-state municipal utilities has volunteered 
to finance the transmission-line expansion if the state promises 
reimbursement. But that's something the state isn't willing to do in light of 
the bankruptcy that leaves the project in PG&E hands. 
The Transmission Agency of Northern California said it could have completed 
the work in just a couple years. 
Even if the way is cleared for the upgrades, more 150-foot-tall steel towers 
spaced at quarter-mile intervals don't make popular neighbors. Although the 
area is largely rural, citizen protests could delay or stall the work on the 
lines, which some link to radiation-related health hazards. 
The project would cost between $200 million and $300 million and take years 
to complete, but it is but one of several necessary grid upgrades, although 
most of them are lesser in scope.