The CMTA Fall Conference scheduled for
               October 31 - November 2 has been canceled.
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Legislative Weekly
                            October 26, 2001
                           Issue 42, Volume 3

                     A weekly publication from the
           California Manufacturers & Technology Association
     detailing legislative and regulatory developments in Sacramento

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE: ECONOMY CONTINUES SLIDE
10,000 Manufacturing Jobs Lost in September

The California Department of Finance reports in their October bulletin
that the employment and revenue picture in the state is not positive.
The most available economic data on the state do not yet reflect the
economic impacts or conditions after the September 11, 2001 attacks.
The Department indicated in their October bulletin that although too
little time has elapsed to accurately appraise the attacks? impact on
the state, it is reasonable to assume that the full impacts of the
September attacks will be quite serious, add to existing economic woes,
and are now only beginning to emerge.

Labor market figures in the bulletin for September reflect employment
status at anytime during the second week of the month, including
September 10, the day preceding the attacks.

   * Nonfarm employment, based on a survey of establishments, declined
     17,400 in September.  Industry estimates for September indicate a
     decline in construction employment, weakness in nearly all
     manufacturing sectors, gains in private service employment, and an
     anomalous drop in government employment.
   * Manufacturing employment dropped by 10,100 jobs in September.
     California?s high-tech specialties?computers, electronics,
     aerospace, and instruments?accounted for over 60 percent of the
     losses.  Only textile mill employment rose in September.
   * Service sector employment rose by 6,500 in September based on gains
     in motion pictures (3,800 jobs), social services (3,000 jobs), and
     engineering and management consulting (1,700 jobs).  These gains
     offset the fifth consecutive monthly decline in business service
     employment, which lost 3,000 jobs.
   * On a year-over-year basis, services added the most jobs, 66,100,
     followed closely by government, 61,100 and more distantly by
     wholesale and retail trade, 47,200.  Manufacturing lost 63,000 jobs
     over the year, with losses in nearly all sectors.  High tech
     manufacturing has been hard hit.
   * California's unemployment rate, based on a survey of households,
     inched up 0.1 percent to 5.4 percent in September based on a rise
     by 7,000 in the number unemployed.  A year ago, the unemployment
     rate was 4.9 percent.  The national unemployment rate, at 4.9
     percent, is up a full percentage point over the year.
   * Preliminary General Fund agency cash for September was $468 million
     below the 2001 Budget Act forecast of $7.451 billion.  At this
     time, it does not appear that any significant amount of this
     month?s shortfall was attributable to the September 11 terrorist
     attacks.  If a reduction in taxable sales occurred as a result of
     those attacks, it will be reflected in the sales tax receipts due
     at the end of October.  Any other effects on revenues, due to such
     things as the fall in the stock market or employment losses, may
     not be apparent for some time.  Year-to-date, revenues are $608
     million below expectations.

CPUC EXPLORES ISSUES SURROUNDING DIRECT ACCESS

On September 20, the CPUC suspended the right to enter into new
contracts for direct access. The CPUC left for later consideration what
effect should  be given to contracts executed before September 20, 2001,
including renewals of such contracts. (Previously the CPUC indicated
that it might suspend direct access effective  July 1, 2001.)

On October 23, Commissioner Wood issued a ruling asking for public input
on direct access contracts, noting that commencing on or about July 1,
2001, there has been an increase in customers switching to direct
access.

He states that ?there are serious policy concerns about cost-shifting.
If customers are allowed to switch to direct access, there is a
potential for these exiting customers to avoid helping to pay down the
unprecedented debt incurred by the State to help weather the energy
crisis. These cost-shifting issues are part of the Commission?s
consideration in determining whether there should be an earlier
suspension date and what this date should be.?

Some of the questions he asks include:

1)  Why should or shouldn?t the Commission choose an earlier date (than
after September 20, 2001) for suspending the right to acquire direct
access service?

2)  If the Commission should choose an earlier date, why should or
shouldn?t the Commission consider a July 1, 2001 suspension?  If not
July 1, 2001, what other date or dates should the Commission consider
and why?

3)  Are there alternatives to suspending direct access as of a date
before September 20, 2001, that would still alleviate cost-shifting
problems?

4)  What effect, if any, should be given to renewals of contracts
originally entered into prior to the effective date of the Commission?s
suspension of direct access?

5)  What effect, if any, should be given to provisions in contracts
(?add-on provisions?) that allow the buyer to add more facilities to be
served after the date on which direct access is suspended?

6)  For electric service providers ? How many contracts have you entered
into with direct access customers between January 17, 2001 and September
20, 2001?   What percentage of your total direct access contracts
contains any renewal provision?   What percentage of your total direct
access contracts contains any add-on provision?

Also requested are copies of unsigned contract forms and signed
contracts, with names and other sensitive information deleted but
contract signing dates retained.

CMTA will be submitting written comments which are due November 2, 2001.

EMPLOYERS IN A QUANDARY ON TEMPORARY PLANT SHUTDOWN STATUS

The California Manufacturers & Technology Association (CMTA) is
continuing to seek clarification from the Industrial Welfare Commission
(IWC) in regards to the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE)
Opinion Letter of May 30, 2001, Re: ?Deductions From Exempt Employees
Salary.?  This very controversial letter written by Mr. Miles Locker,
Chief Counsel, DLSE generated an enormous number of complaints from
employers.  Labor Commissioner Arthur Lujan suspended the letter on June
20, 2001 and requested clarification from the Industrial Welfare
Commission (IWC) of the criteria for determining the correct
interpretation of ?salary.?

However, the letter left reduction from exempt employees salary and
other issues raised in the letter unresolved and still hanging over the
heads of employers when they are about to enter the most frequent
periods of use, Thanksgiving and Christmas weeks.  CMTA believes that
the ?salary basis? test applicable to all wage orders should be
interpreted in a manner consistent with the ?salary basis? test in the
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) that California has consistently
followed over the years.

Under the FLSA the salary deduction for exempt employees is measured by
weeks and not months as opined by Mr. Locker under California law. The
opinion letter prohibited any deductions from exempt employee?s salary
in increments of less than one month based on the quantity of work,
quality of work and or business operating requirements.  Therefore, in
order to be eligible for the overtime exemption, the employee must
receive his or her full salary for any month in which he or she performs
any work without regard to the number of days or hours worked.  This is
a particularly onerous provision for manufacturers who have a long
history of temporarily shutting plants down for a week over such
holidays as Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year's Day.  During
temporary plant shut downs, employees are permitted to use accrued
vacation or other paid time off to meet the salary requirement for days
missed.

Employers are facing many economic challenges in our slowing economy and
flexibility is needed to improve efficiencies and control cost if
employers are to remain competitive and minimize layoffs. Employers are
already faced with high energy costs and double digit cost increases in
health and workers? compensation insurance premiums that only seem to
grow.  That is why the commission needs to take action now to clearly
and specifically state that California?s policy on exempt worker salary
deductions was, is and continues to follow the FLSA on exempt worker
salary reductions.

WASTE BOARD DELAYS ADOPTION OF CONTROVERSIAL STRATEGIC PLAN

In response to concerns raised by the business community, the California
Integrated Waste Management Board agreed earlier this week to delay
adoption of a controversial draft Strategic Plan.  The Plan is intended
to serve as the Board?s blueprint for resource allocation and
policymaking over the next 3-5 years.  Business concerns revolve around
the process by which the document was developed and concepts that
promote new taxes on products and packaging.  See last week?s article
for more information.

The Board will entertain further discussion on the draft Plan at a
November 7 workshop. The Board?s action should allow CMTA and other
stakeholders to engage Board members and staff in a meaningful dialogue
before the Plan is adopted.

CMTA REQUESTS JUDICIAL CLARIFICATION OF RULE GOVERNING INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY DISCLOSURE DURING LITIGATION

Acting as amicus curiae, CMTA has urged a California Court of Appeal to
provide guidance to the business public regarding the extent and
conditions under which trade secret information must be revealed in the
pre-trial discovery process in trade secret misappropriation cases.

The California statute which governs such discovery exchanges states
that a party claiming to have been injured from trade secret
misappropriation may obtain another party?s trade secret records only if
it identifies the relevant trade secrets with ?reasonable
particularity.?  The purpose behind the statute clearly is to protect
responding parties from fishing expeditions being launched outside the
scope of the dispute which is the subject of the lawsuit.  A trade
secret can be the most valuable asset of a business.  Moreover, it is
extremely vulnerable to destruction during litigation as its disclosure
can destroy its secret quality and hence its value.  Finally, and most
importantly, as parties to trade secret litigation are usually
competitors, revelation of trade secret information by one to the other
tends to have direct and harmful consequences.

Thus, the California legislature passed the statute to help protect
against unreasonable discovery practices which would tend to affect
adversely such material.  Unfortunately, the statute provides no
guidance as to the manner in which the parties must comply.   Ambiguity
in this area causes uncertainty and expense to business.

www.cmta.net
California Manufacturers & Technology Association
980 9th Street, Suite 2200
Sacramento, CA  95814
(916) 441-5420 phone
(916) 447-9401 fax

You are receiving this message today because your company is a valued
member of the California Manufacturers & Technology Association (CMTA).
While we'd be pleased to continue to tell you about CMTA's efforts to
make California a better place for manufacturing you can unsubscribe by
e-mailing a message to members@cmta.net