Attached is the revised CA allowing for jurisdiction in New York.

Thanks,

Stephanie 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Gross, Stephen" <sgross@newportgen.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Gross+2C+20Stephen+22+20+3Csgross+40newportgen+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 6:52 PM
To:	Miller, Stephanie
Subject:	RE: Reciprocal Confidentiality Agreement

Stephanie,

I am fine with this except for the Texas law provision.  How about NY law as
a substitute?

Thanks,

Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Stephanie [mailto:Stephanie.Miller@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:55 AM
To: sgross@newportgen.com
Subject: Reciprocal Confidentiality Agreement


 <<NewportGen-bi-CA.doc>>

CA attached for your review.

Regards,

Stephanie


**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************