Don't we want the ISO to provide to whom the refunds are entitled?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jo Ann Scott" <joann.scott@ferc.fed.us>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jo+20Ann+20Scott+22+20+3Cjoann+2Escott+40ferc+2Efed+2Eus+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:29 AM
To:	acomnes@enron.com; Steffes, James D.; Robertson, Linda; Alvarez, Ray; rfrank@enron.com; Frank, Robert; smara@enron.com
Subject:	FW message from ISO


NOTE: WE RECEIVED THIS PROPOSED SCHEDULE  FROM THE ISO AND ARE  FORWARDING IT ALL THE PARTIES ON OUR LIST AND ON SCE'S LIST.  PLEASE NOTE  THAT THEY INCLUDE THE ADDRESS TO  FAX YOUR NON-DISLOSURE STATEMENT TO SO WE  CAN GET THE DATA..
       Aug  9   ISO provides mitigated prices together with a write-up  
                   of its methodology and two attachments: gas prices and  
                   heat rates 
        Aug 14  ISO provides Transaction data (sales by bid segment)  
        Aug 17  ISO provides refund amounts by seller 
                   (The remaining items that are on Staff's proposal  
                    under the date of Aug 15th) 
        Aug 24  Initial pre-filed testimony by all 
        Aug 31  Responsive testimony by all 
        Sept 5  (The items listed on Staff's proposal for Aug 22,  absent 
                 the  Protective Order which already has been dealt with) 
        Sept 6-13  Hearing 
        Sept 21  Briefing by all, including proposed findings of fact  
                    with citations to the record support  
         
        In putting together the above schedule the ISO was as aggressive as it  could be in making the essential data available.  Although it will not be  possible to provide everything on the 9th, what will be provided on that date  (the mitigated prices and their derivation) will allow the parties to get  started on the most important, and possibly controversial, data set, and will  include the items covered by the Order issued by Chief Judge Wagner.  The  above schedule does afford Judge Birchman 10 days to prepare his findings and  still comply with the 45 day limitation if he is willing to commence that 45-day  schedule on Aug 17th, the date on which the ISO would complete the above  submission.  If Judge Birchman does not believe that he is free to do so in  light of the Commission Order, we would urge that he certify to the Commission  our joint request for a modest extension.  (We do believe that the ISO will  be in compliance, certainly substantially so, with the data that it is to  produced within the specified 15-day period and we read the Commission Order as  intending to provide the ALJ a full 45 days from the completion of the data  submission.)
   
        There is another important process issue that we have got to put in place  IMMEDIATELY.  May I please prevail on you to include in your transmittal to  all of the parties that they should fax a signed copy of the Non-Disclosure  Certificate to Stacey Karpenin at the ISO (mailing the original to her).   Stacey's fax number is (916) 608-7296 (her phone number is (916)  608-7273).  In the transmittal to Stacey the ISO should be advised of the  Company name and its billing code (there will be charges associated with  preparing the disk as well as air courier charges), the person to whom the  materials are to be sent together with that individual's address, phone and fax  numbers. Upon receipt of the faxed signature page the ISO will air courier ONE  set of the materials to the designated individual. The ISO can only assure that  it will be able to air courier the materials for delivery on the 9th if it is in  receipt of the Non-Disclosure Statement and the above information by 3 PM (PDT)  on the 8th.