Yes, but we are consistenly being OOMC'd,  so it's kind of an ongoing question.
Thanks,
JMF

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Patterson, Mark" <mpatterson@testmail.ercot.com>@ENRON  
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:18 PM
To:	Forney, John M.
Subject:	RE: OOMC  Capacity Payments

If you are referring to the OOMC for September 14th we are still working
on a number of issues pertaining to that trade day.

-----Original Message-----
From: Forney, John M. [mailto:John.M.Forney@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Mark Patterson (E-mail)
Cc: Jerry Watson (E-mail)
Subject: OOMC Capacity Payments




Mark,
Thanks for your reply concerning ancillary service procurement.    I was
wondering if Ercot had made a decision on OOM capacity payments.
Our position is that our custmers,  ie.   Teco/Frontera   should recover
at least their O&M expenses for the capacity,  as they are standing by
awaiting instruction.

Has there been any progress in this subject?

JForney


**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************