fyi,

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lamadrid, Victor  
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:27 AM
To:	Ames, Chuck; Brawner, Sandra F.; Germany, Chris; Goodell, Scott; Hodge, John; Keavey, Peter F.; Mckay, Brad; Mckay, Jonathan; Neal, Scott; Pereira, Susan W.; Pimenov, Vladi; Ring, Andrea; Savvas, Leonidas; Smith, Maureen; Taylor, Craig; Townsend, Judy; Versen, Victoria; Vickers, Frank
Cc:	Superty, Robert; Smith, George F.; Pinion, Richard; Jaquet, Tammy; Kinsey, Lisa; Schrab, Mark L.; Sullivan, Patti; Farmer, Daren J.; Hall, Bob M; Calcagno, Suzanne; Greif, Donna; Allwein, Robert; Arteaga, Airam; Boudreaux, Shanna; Carter, Tamara; Collins, Joann; Erwin, Stephanie ; Garcia, Clarissa; Gillespie, Steve; Halstead, Lia; Homco, Meredith; Loocke, Kelly; Loving, Scott; Ordway, Chris; Prudenti, Dan; Ramirez, Robert; Sanchez, Christina; Wood, Tracy
Subject:	FW: Sitara EOL Bridge Problem Today

FYI>>>We were also monitoring the EOL to Sitara bridge during this time to inform our traders and other desks of the situation and status...All deals bridged over by 10:30ish. THANKS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Truong, Dat  
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:11 AM
To:	Moorer, Torrey; Lamadrid, Victor; Severson, Russ; Grant, George
Cc:	Husain, Karima; Lim, Francis S.; Saluja, Gurdip; Sweitzer, Tara
Subject:	Sitara EOL Bridge Problem Today

The problem we faced today was due to 2 eol deal packets (2098073, 2099764) not having startdate and enddate.  Missing these 2 tibco message fields caused the bridge to bounce and resulted in the queue to build up while the bridge is starting up. (The bridge takes 2 minute for startup).  Each time these deals are sent/resent, it continuously cause the Sitarar EOLBridge to restart, thus magnifying the buildup of the queue.

The corrective action we are taking at our end is to build a rejection logic when eol packets do not have start and/or enddate. 

-Dat Truong