I like that better.  When is that meeting?  Or, do we want to do that separately outside of the PRC evaluation meeting?
-----Original Message-----
From: Corteselli, Gina 
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Cash, Michelle
Subject: RE: Diversity information for VP PRC


How about you come in and brief them orally?  
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Cash, Michelle 
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:13 AM
To: Corteselli, Gina
Subject: RE: Diversity information for VP PRC
 
I don't think that is a good idea.
-----Original Message-----
From: Corteselli, Gina 
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:16 AM
To: Cash, Michelle
Subject: RE: Diversity information for VP PRC
We were intending to put these results (which would actually be preliminary and based on the prerating results for VP's) into the VP data books.    
-----Original Message-----
From: Cash, Michelle 
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:05 AM
To: Corteselli, Gina
Subject: RE: Diversity information for VP PRC
 
Who will get them?  I am happy to sit down with him in a privileged conversation and discuss those statistics, which I think is the best way to protect the privilege.  Otherwise, if it goes to him at his request, then there is no protection if we find undesirable results. 
-----Original Message-----
From: Corteselli, Gina 
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:13 AM
To: Cash, Michelle; Oxley, David
Subject: Diversity information for VP PRC
Hi Michelle;
 
Dovie told me that she has had a chat with you regarding the diversity stats we were preparing for the VP PRC on 23 July.  Delainey had asked specifically for these stats, and that's why wewere including them.  Is there any way that we can provide the data, perhaps marking it attny privilidge?  If not, can we discuss this with Delainey so that he is aware of the reasons PEP PRC cannot provide it?  I'd apprecuate your thoughts.  Thanks, Gina