So far so good.  Lets see if we can get through the day...

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com>@ENRON 
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Thompson+2C+20Peter+20J+2E+22+20+3Cpthompson+40akllp+2Ec
om+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Williams, Bill; Mann, Kay; THOMAS CONSTANTINE
Cc: Rasmussen, Dale; Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: LV Co Gen

I have already incorporated Lee's comment in a new Version 7.  I am just
waiting for any additional comments.

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Bill [mailto:Bill.Williams@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Mann, Kay; THOMAS CONSTANTINE
Cc: Rasmussen, Dale; Thompson, Peter J.; Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: LV Co Gen


Kay - I just checked the April 24th draft.  The addition is not there
now, and it need to be.  By this e mail, Tom and Peter, please
incorporate those comments.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Mann, Kay
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:12 AM
> To: THOMAS CONSTANTINE
> Cc: Mann, Kay; Williams, Bill; Rasmussen, Dale; pthompson@akllp.com;
> Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
> Subject: RE: LV Co Gen
>
>
> I sent this email from GE to Dale/Bill after I received it.  Since
> Peter's last draft was April 24, I'm I assume this wasn't included:
>
>
>
>
>
> Kay/Bill,
>
> Bill says he agrees and accepts our comments to the A&A.
>
> One change required to the Rev 5 document.  In Exhibit B, Add item
> "27)One
> additional Human Machine Interface (HMI) per Unit (desktop PC type)"
>
> Include these changes and we can get this done tomorrow.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lee