I believe that the Resolutions No. 4, 6 and 9 are not correct in terms of the text:

1. resolution no. 4 is not correct since the S.Board did not review the new (attached) changes to the budget and did not approve it. There was also an amandement to the text of the Resolution re. the line items and the total amounts exeeding the approved budget.	

I believe that the draft Budget with the new amendemends must be reviewed once again as a whole at the next Sup.Board meeting before it can be enacted.

2. Resoltuions No. 6 and 9 - the vote descritpion is not correct

Regards - Jarek

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maziarz, Renata  
Sent:	23 November 2001 08:14
To:	Overfield, Adam; Cattigan, Ed; Edgley, Anne; Derrick Jr., James; Astramowicz, Jarek; Forycki, Krzysztof; Wantschek, Lloyd
Cc:	Glowacki, Jacek; Sierzega, Iwona; Lojko, George
Subject:	Supervisory Board Meeting on 2001-11-20
Importance:	High

Dear All,
Attached please find the following documents for the Supervisory Board Meeting dated 20 November 2001 for you final approval and signatures.

kind regards,
Renata Maziarz
1.  << File: 01-11-20 Minutes of the SB meeting.doc >> 
2.  << File: Att No 1-O&M Budget for 2001-rev1.xls >> 
3.  << File: Att No 1-O&M Budget for 2001-rev1.xls >> 



4.  << File: BUDGET2002 revision 1.xls >> Budget-rev 1 is the Attachment No 3.