I'm just glad I'm going to be out of town for the next 3 weekends.  What pray tell will she do?  With no buffer there, will there be any reason for Mitch not to shack?  I'm curious to see how all of this plays out.  She keeps looking for signs to know whether Mitch is right or not...I told her it's pretty unlikely that anything's going to whack her over the head so she's just going to have to figure out for herself what she thinks of him.  She's got such a tough life.  

Oh, my Mom was over Sunday and made some comment about Lisa always dating someone....she still denies.  Cracks me up.  Response is always,  "I've only had two serious boyfriends."  To which I've started to respond, "We'll I'm batting zero and have only one legitimate first date with a guy.  In relative terms, you are a dating phenomenon."

I definitely need this vacation,
Sue


   
	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  "Emily Hillegeist" <ehillegeist@hotmail.com>                           03/27/2001 09:59 AM	
		


To:	Susan.M.Scott@enron.com
cc:	 
Subject:	Re: UGGGHHHHH


she must live under the "PR mentality", that being 'any attenion is GOOD
attention'.....and of course there's NO regard for the audience.  makes me
think of the jon lovitz SNL skit: "i just want to be loved, is that so
WRONG?!?"


>From: Susan.M.Scott@enron.com
>To: ehillegeist@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: UGGGHHHHH
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:52:08 -0600
>
>
>I know, I know.  It's still weird to me.  While I thought it was great that
>Lisa was holding back on the physical side of this relationship early
>on...I'm beginning to wonder if she really likes him, or just likes having
>someone to talk to who will cater to her.  I mean, I'm all for prudence
>when it comes to the physical side of relationships, but after a month of
>constant contact and interaction I would have to question the fact I didn't
>feel compelled to completely jump the guy.  That's not to say I would, but
>I'd still have to question the lack of desire to do so.  I just don't get
>the impression that she is that attracted to him.  Seems more like "good
>buddy" to me.  I think she misses the Matt's, Alan's, Thatcher's, etc. that
>she got that from in the past.
>
>On the plus sides, he is a very happy person who loves to smile and is
>pleasant to be around.  I just get squeamish watching people cuddle so
>much.  I'm having flashbacks to sharing a room with Jen when Craigers was
>in the picture.  It's not a pleasant memory, trust me.  I do think it's
>weird that Lisa never wants me to leave their presence...they both
>questioned me when I took off to bed last night around 9:30...I just wanted
>out.
>
>Sue
>
>
>
>
>  (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
>  image moved
>  to file:      From:  "Emily Hillegeist"
>  pic28315.pcx) <ehillegeist@hotmail.com>
>                03/27/2001 09:36 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>To:   Susan.M.Scott@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Re: UGGGHHHHH
>
>
>NO!  again, sue- you are giving lisa too much credit- assuming she is
>capable of a motivation or thought that is BEYOND our comprehension!  the
>truth is, you DO understand, just don't it to be the truth- it's a dark,
>scary place to go!  basically, she wants to "show off"  what she HAS, and
>yet again, PRAY you will be in full veg mode, looking as pitiful as, say, i
>do rt now- on my couch, eating gummy bears- thoroughly enjoying my wasted
>existance- so that she can further convince the oh-so-dimple mitch that he
>"picked the RIGHT roomie!"  and i honest to god think she DOES think that
>way.  or, perhaps, spending quality alone time w/ him would incenuate too
>much of a relationship, and when she tries to "capture" the swiss boy's
>affection (while cleverly using a visit w/ her good pal em as a
>justification) she won't feel as bad- i mean, she and mitch WEREN'T that
>close...at least, SHE wasn't.....no harm, no foul.  whoa.  should i be a
>therapist, or what.  or be IN therapy- can channel people's "dark sides" so
>easily, it MUST be a sign....must use my powers for good, must use my
>powers
>for good....!
>e
>
>
> >From: Susan.M.Scott@enron.com
> >To: ehillegeist@hotmail.com
> >Subject: UGGGHHHHH
> >Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:19:39 -0600
> >
> >He was over again last night.  Please explain to me why you would invite
> >your "man" over to your apartment when you have a roommate and he lives
> >alone.  I simply do not understand.  I took full advantage of the fact
>Ted
> >lived alone...we never hung out at my apartment.  Where's the fun in
>that?
> >I just think it's weird.
> >
> >Talk to you later,
> >Sue
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>
><< pic28315.pcx >>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com