Shirley,

11:00am CA-time is fine (1:00pm TX-time).
I'll be at 650 725-5525.

My cell phone number is 650 796-8163.
Please call me there if plans change.

Thanks,

Nick


Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com wrote:
>
> Hello Nick:
>
> I agree  e-mail is much easier.
>
> There is a two-hour time difference between Calif and Texas, i.e., 1:00 pm
> Texas Time - 11:00 am Calif time.
>
> Would tomorrow at 11:00 am Calif time be ok with you (1:00 pm Texas)?
> This time is fine for Vince, Tom Gros and Stinson Gibner.
>
> Can they call you and if so, what number?
>
> Please let me know.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Shirley
> 713-853-5290
>
> Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 03/16/2000 12:28:58 PM
>
> To:   Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
> cc:   bambos@stanford.Stanford.EDU
> Subject:  Re: Visit to Enron
>
> Shirley,
>
> It's easier to communcate by e-mail, since I am moving from
> meeting to meeting (but I have the laptop always with me).
>
> Please give me a phone number that I could call tomorrow.
> What is the time difference between California and your
> location? I think it's 2 hours (CA->TX) - is that right?
>
> I can do the conference call any time from 9-11 CA time.
> Would that be OK on your side?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick
>
> Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > Nick,
> >
> > We can close the loop on our commitment to support the research projects
> > before your visit to Enron.
> >
> > My assistant, Shirley  Crenshaw, will call you to set up a conference
> call
> > with me, Stinson Gibner,
> > and Tom Gros from Enron Broadband Services to discuss all the isssues.
> > Friday this week would work for
> > both Tom and me. I think we need about 15 minutes.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> > P.S. Shirley, Nick's phone number is 650 796 8163 (cell), 650-725-5525
> > (office).
> >
> > Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 03/12/2000 05:32:35 PM
> >
> > To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, bambos@stanford.Stanford.EDU
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Visit to Enron
> >
> > Hello Vince,
> >
> > It was nice seeing you at Stanford and many thanks for the lunch
> > we had together. I really enjoyed our discussions, both at the
> > technical level and otherwise.
> >
> > I promised to send you an e-mail regarding possible dates for
> > a visit to Enron. I delayed it for a week till my schedule was
> > clearer. Let's see if we can get a match with your schedule -
> > mine is rather terrible:
> >
> > Friday, 21st of April looks good. But April 23rd is Easter
> > Sunday, so that may make it difficult for some people at Enron
> > to be around. Let me know if that is the case. I am willing to
> > visit then, because the week after that I am scheduled to be in
> > Japan and in the previous weeks I am all committed on Fridays.
> >
> > Friday, 19th of May is the next possibility, but this probably
> > is too far out. The main problem is that I am operating within
> > a window of opportunity for attracting top students for this
> > research. This window closes by the end of April, and it would be
> > important for the student support funds to be in place then, so
> > that I can make hard commitments to students and attract top
> > talent. I am already reviewing files of students who have
> > approached me for PhD advising, and I am in a mode of doing "soft
> > commitments to star-level students" to get this research and its
> > potential on their radar screen. Top students are highly sought
> > after by advisors and I want to be an early player in this
> > competition.
> >
> > Does my visit to Enron have to happen before we can set up the
> > project and student support at Stanford? If so, doing it before the
> > end of April is important for getting top people. If the visit can
> > happen after we get the ball rolling, then we can schedule it in May.
> > I assume there will be multiple visits both ways when the project gets
> > going. Please let me know what you think.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Nick