I have decided that I would like this product to be set up the other way around where it is quoted as ComEd vs Cin.  I realize that it will show up as a negative spread, but I have other basis (spread) locations in mind that trade over Cinergy and can see how it will be confusing to some people in the industry.

Fletch  (3-9684)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nettelton, Marcus  
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 2:52 PM
To:	Walker, Chris
Cc:	Sturm, Fletcher J.; Meredith, Kevin; Taylor, Mark
Subject:	Re: Cinergy vs COMED phy spread

Chris
	
The changes, except for the scheduling changes, have been included in the proposed final version of this East Power Physical Spread product and as requested confirm that I currently have no further issues with this product. 

The quicker we can get the scheduling language added the better, especially from the trader's perspective.
	
Regards,
	
Marcus




	Marcus Nettelton 05/25/2001 11:28 AM 	  To: Chris Walker/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: Fletcher J Sturm/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin Meredith/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: Re: Cinergy vs COMED phy spread << OLE Object: StdOleLink >> 	


Chris
	
Suggested additions are marked in red. I have included the scheduling language agreed for the Into products as well.
	
Regards,
	
Marcus
	
 << File: ~1372255.doc >> 




	Chris Walker/ENRON@enronXgate 05/25/2001 09:38 AM 	   To: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Fletcher J Sturm/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: Kevin Meredith/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: Cinergy vs COMED phy spread	


Marcus-

	Please review the attached long description for a new East Power phy spread product/product type and let me know of any changes or 	suggestions.

Fletch-

	Please review the description as well and contact me with any questions you may have about the new functionality.

Chris Walker
3-7533


 << File: Cinergy vs COMED.doc >>