So does this mean we're right where we left off with respect to status of 
bills like wind-fall profits, jails for generators, etc.?



	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	05/10/2001 05:28 PM
		 
		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev 
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara 
<smara@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman <paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald 
<Michael.McDonald@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin <Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, 
Rick Shapiro <rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, 
Alan Comnes <acomnes@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen 
Denne <kdenne@enron.com>, "Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" 
<Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, Leslie Lawner 
<Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, Robert Frank <rfrank@enron.com>, Ken Smith 
<ken@kdscommunications.com>, Janel Guerrero <Janel.Guerrero@enron.com>, 
Miyung Buster <Miyung.Buster@enron.com>, Jennifer Thome 
<Jennifer.Thome@enron.com>, Eric Letke <eletke@enron.com>, Mary Schoen 
<Mary.Schoen@enron.com>, David Leboe <David.Leboe@ENRON.com>
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Secone Extraordinary Session

At the request of Senate President Pro Tem John Burton and Senate
Minority Leader Jim Brulte, the Senate desk has arranged for the
preparation of all First Ex bills for reintroduction as Second Ex bills,
retaining the same numbers. These measures will be redrafted in their
last First Ex version or, in the case of those already having reached
the Assembly, in the form in which they left the Senate.

It is the intention of the President Pro Tem to move all measures in the
new extraordinary session to the same place they remained at the end of
the first extraordinary session.