---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/06/2000 03:34 
PM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Christi L Nicolay @ ECT                           11/06/2000 02:29 PM
	

To: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob 
Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch 
Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Patrick Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry 
Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D 
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah 
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna 
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: VEPCO files Interconnection Proc. at FERC

On 10/27/00, VEPCO filed interconnection procedures at FERC (Docket No. 
ER01-247)(Protests due 11/17/00).  These largely mirror CP&L's 
interconnection procedures that were recently approved by FERC.  Therefore, I 
do not think that Enron should protest or intervene.

Customer is required to pay for the cost of a new system impact/facilities 
study if the study information/interconnection/upgrade costs change due to a 
customer higher in the queue losing its queue spot.
System impact studies should take 60 days or less.  Facilities studies should 
take 90 days or less.