John, completely agree with your view - David, I would have the matrix, with 
all of the ENA statistics and names, ready for distribution on Friday to the 
key managers to try and illicit a response from the low participation folks.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000 
12:16 PM ---------------------------


John J Lavorato@ENRON
09/27/2000 09:08 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Status of Completed Performance Reviews


I hope the data on these performance reviews is wrong.  I think we need 100% 
of reviews done.  Do you agree.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 09/27/2000 
09:02 AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Sheila Knudsen                           09/14/2000 09:20 PM
	

To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J 
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT 

Subject: Status of Completed Performance Reviews



Attached, for your information is a matrix reflecting the status of completed 
reviews from the mid-year 2000 process.  This is broken down by ENA 
organization units, as they were structured at mid-year, prior to the 
creation of EGM and EIM.

I will provide you with a weekly update on the status.

Please call me at X36628 should you have any questions.