---------------------- Forwarded by V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001 10:22 AM ---------------------------
   

	Enron North America Corp.  From:  V Charles Weldon                           05/16/2001 11:11 AM	
		


To:	Matthew Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development, Mike Coleman/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	 
Subject:	Re: Fuel Oil Sample

Our "spec" is <.05 ppm.  I talked to Doug about whether or not the measurement can be made to a greater degree of accuracy.  We believe it is not but Doug said he would provide us with a contact to call concerning the vanadium measurement accuracy.  I'm still waiting on that contact name and number.  The thought here was to have this contact discuss the iissue first-hand with the engineering team so a judgement can be made.

Thanks,

Charlie


---------------------- Forwarded by V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2001 11:05 AM ---------------------------
To:	V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	 
Subject:	Re: Fuel Oil Sample   

Saybolt test result for low sulfur #2 vanadium is less than 0.1ppm using ASTM D-3605. Give me your fax number and I can send you a copy. 


   

	Enron North America Corp.  From:  V Charles Weldon                           05/14/2001 09:02 AM	
		


To:	Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	 
Subject:	Fuel Oil Sample

Doug,

This note is just to confirm my voicemail message this morning  indicating that the charges for the Fuel Oil sample check for vanadium should be charged to Co# 0413, RC # 106230.  According to the spec sheet I have, the ASTM method for vanadium is D3605 and the units of measurement are ppm (wt).

Again, I appreciate your patience in this frustrating issue.


Charlie








<Embedded StdOleLink>