A volume of 6,289 Mmbtu flowed over the noms for CP&L.  I don't have a record 
of a spot deal with them for that day.

Gary - Currently, that volume has been allocated to the Term agreement.  The 
price difference on that day is significant.  (HSC GD mid was 5.245).  If you 
don't have a record of a spot deal, the allocation should stand as it is.

D




Rebecca Griffin@ENRON
03/27/2001 04:08 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: CP&L

Daren,

I am handling CP&L and am trying to resolve this issue from February 
production.  CP&L shows 5,000 mmbtu on February 21, but we do not have a 
deal.  Were you able to find anything out about this?

Thanks for your help.

Rebecca
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca Griffin/NA/Enron on 03/27/2001 
04:04 PM ---------------------------


Katherine Herrera
03/26/2001 09:57 AM
To: Rebecca Griffin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Re: CP&L


---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron on 
03/26/2001 09:46 AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Gary W Lamphier @ ECT                           03/26/2001 09:52 AM
	

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Re: CP&L  

Can we verified this gas flowed?  If it did it should have been billed on his 
term deal if there was one in place.  If the gas flowed and we did not 
invoice for it on term let me know and I will put it in.



Janet H Wallis
03/22/2001 04:53 PM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON 
Subject: CP&L

Bob says he was not billed for a purchase he made from you at 5K  $5.16 on 
Feb 21st.  Will you check this out and get with
Bob A and Katherine Herrera.

JW