I used to work at EECC, so I know that noone controls that group!

There is a place in the agreement for a contract number.  I think we ought to 
use the same contract number as before, but add a distinguishing number or 
letter- like FV or LVCG.  How does that sound?

Kay






Alan Larsen@ECT
12/12/2000 10:49 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Re: CO for Fountain Valley

Kay--I left you a voice mail apologizing for your being bombarded with 
general questions about the C.O.s for Fountain Valley.  My intention was that 
EE&CC would get the CO into final shape, and just pass it on to you at the 
point it was ready for GE signature.  I do have one question though, in light 
of Dale's note below:  how we want to identify the Fountain Valley breakout, 
as opposed to the previous GE master agreement.  Thanks.
 Al Larsen
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT on 12/12/2000 08:37 
AM ---------------------------


Dale Rasmussen
12/11/2000 07:30 PM
To: Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Re: CO#6 for Fountain Valley  

The way the process works as I understand it, is this:

Last week we developed forms of breakout contracts for each of the turbine 
"groups" (1 for LV, 1 for Fountain Valley, etc.).

In order to accomplish changes to the individual breakout contracts 
reflecting changes to project-specific turbines, it was decided that rather 
than issue any additional change orders under the master (24 unit) contract, 
either (a) the individual breakout contracts would be modified prior to 
execution to reflect the changed information; or (b) change orders would be 
issued under the individual breakout contract.

I worked with the crew last week on the form of breakout contract for the LV 
turbines.  I haven't done any change orders under that contract.

As I interpret the attachment below, the required modification is to change 
the reference from CO#6 to the master contract to CO #1 to the Fountain 
Valley breakout contract.  Of course, I may be missing something here.

I did an earlier change order to the master contract that I could forward, if 
that would help.





Alan Larsen
12/11/2000 04:43 PM
To: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: CO#6 for Fountain Valley

Dale--I understand that you have done Ge change orders breaking out the LV 
Cogen equip.  Could you send me a copy of your breakout C.O.? Thanks.
 Al 
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT on 12/11/2000 04:33 
PM ---------------------------


Kay Mann@ENRON
12/11/2000 03:37 PM
To: michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com
cc: Ed.Dannhaus@enron.com, mtezyk@enron.com, lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, Ben 
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, 
Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Re: CO#6 for Fountain Valley  

Gentlemen,

Since we are moving the equipment from WestLB and into TurboPark, and since 
we are just about there with the breakout contracts, we need to process this 
as change order #1 to the Fountain Valley contract.  I also believe we need 
the site specific stuff for this project.  

Kay



michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com on 12/11/2000 03:17:27 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com, Ed.Dannhaus@enron.com, mtezyk@enron.com
cc: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com 

Subject: CO#6 for Fountain Valley


All,

Attachment contains latest revision reflecting order for two additional
stacks, six power stabilizers and moving cost for the Fountain Valley
Project.  Please review and let me know if additional changes are required
or recommended.

 <<changeorder#6rev2.doc>>
Please note new contact information below:

Mike Storm

  g   GE Aero Energy Products
  ___________________________________
    A GE Power Systems Business
  Michael E. Storm
  Projects
  Phone: (281) 864-2601  Dial Com 8*326-2601
  Fax:  (281) 864-2116, Pager 888 487 5741



 - changeorder#6rev2.doc