Janine --

Where does this stand?  I just read the text and agree with Harry.  Most importantly, the HHI may not be suitable given the high degree of regulation of ComEd service.  

As important, I don't think the ICC cares too much about Enron losing market share.  Not the best lead argument.

Let's talk.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kingerski, Harry  
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 12:12 PM
To:	Migden, Janine; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	FW: Anti-competitive Subgroup

Janine - this is getting insane.  With all due respect to Marc, this has nothing to do with the issues at hand.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ulrich, Marc  
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 11:17 AM
To:	Migden, Janine; rspilky@newenergy.com; poconnor@newenergy.com; jhextell@newenergy.com; dfabrizius@kaztex.com; Christopher.townsend@pipperrudnick.com
Cc:	Sharfman, Guy; Surface, Jerald; Kendall, Heath; Kingerski, Harry; Boston, Roy
Subject:	Anti-competitive Subgroup


Here is a copy of my uncompleted 1st draft of my testimony.  I will hopefully be finishing this week.  
 << File: M-Ulrich Direct Testimony.doc >> 

Also here is a proposed agenda for today's conference call at 3pm


 << File: Agenda ComEd 2001 DST Rate Case 08-06-01.doc >> 

Call number and pass code are as follows.


Monday, August 6, 2001  from 3 p.m. - 4 p.m. CST.  
800-991-9019.  Passcode 7314194#.


Marc L. Ulrich
713-345-4784 (office)
877-720-7711 (pager)