I understand that an Oregon Commission filing will also be required--who
will  be your point person on that??


----- Forwarded by John J Stauffacher/HOU/Dynegy on 11/13/01 01:56 PM -----
                                                                                                               
                    John J                                                                                     
                    Stauffacher          To:     gwatkins@akingump.com                                         
                                         cc:     Ken E Randolph/HOU/Dynegy@Dynegy, Peter                       
                    11/13/01             Esposito/HOU/Dynegy@Dynegy, Dan King/HOU/Dynegy@Dynegy                
                    11:59 AM             Subject:     Merger Filing PUCT                                       
                                                                                                               
                                                                                                               



Attached is a rough draft for our PUCT filing.  Initial review (subject to
check with Enron) is that the combined parties generation in the ERCOT
region will exceed the 1% review threshold but be far below the 20% action
level.  I roughed out the elements of a filing based on the Dynegy/Illinova
docket from two years ago.  I have a meeting scheduled with Chairman
Yzaguirre tomorrow afternoon--thought I might provide him with the table on
generation interests within ERCOT and alert him to the pending request.


(See attached file: Dynegy Enron Meger Application PUCT.doc)           (See
attached file: Dynegy Enron ERCOT Generation market share.doc)