Attached is SERC's 9/28 letter telling NERC that TVA and Enron were still 
working on the wording, but may not reach agreement. I don't think we had 
seen this before.  However, since this was sent last week before the latest 
round of language, I don't think we need to worry about it.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 10/04/99 
10:36 AM ---------------------------


Steven J Kean@EES
10/04/99 10:00 AM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: SERC/TVA/Enron


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 10/04/99 09:59 
AM ---------------------------


Sherri Reinartz@ENRON
09/30/99 01:15 PM
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc:  
Subject: SERC/TVA/Enron

Did you guys get this?  SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Reinartz/Corp/Enron on 09/30/99 
01:13 PM ---------------------------


"Jim Maughn" <jmaughn@serc1.org> on 09/28/99 04:54:33 PM
Please respond to "Jim Maughn" <jmaughn@serc1.org>
To: kamole@nipsco.com, hhawks@tenaska.com, mike.gent@nerc.com
cc: wtboston@tva.gov, Sherri Reinartz/Corp/Enron@Enron, 
wreinke@duke-energy.com, jmaughn@serc1.org 
Subject: SERC/TVA/Enron



Gentlemen:
Attached is SERC's interim report to NERC and the PITF on the subject dispute.
Jim Maughn 
 - att1.htm
 - SERC Enron TVA NERC ltr.doc