---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2000 
11:47 AM ---------------------------


Dave Samuels
05/02/2000 11:26 AM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Re: Organic Confidentiality Agreement

I think their suggested language is fine.  We are not going to publicly 
discuss their employees' compensation.

Please let me know if I can help any further.

---------------------- Forwarded by Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2000 11:25 
AM ---------------------------


Louise Kitchen
05/02/2000 11:18 AM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark 
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Re: Organic Confidentiality Agreement  

Same approval but Dave Samuels not Forster.

I have no problem with this but this Samuel's call



Carol St Clair
01/05/2000 19:35
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT 

Subject: Organic Confidentiality Agreement

David and Louise:
One of the things that Organic has asked us to keep confidential is "the 
existence of any business discussions, negotiations or agreements between the 
parties as well as any information regarding the skills and compensation of 
employees, contractors or other agents of the disclosing party."  This is a 
departure from our form.  Are we prepared to agree to this?  Also, to the 
extent that parties are insisting on using their form of CA, what do you want 
the approval process to be?
Carol