----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 11:23 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	08/07/2000 11:20 AM
		
		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: weather confirm

The attached confirm is a swap.  There is no need for a rep in the confirm.  
If a weather deal is structured as an option, Gordon Heaney (backed by Diane 
Anderson) who confirms weather transactions, adds the weather-specific Trade 
Option rep into the confirmation.  The desk uses a template for options.  Let 
me know if you have any other questions.  Sara



	Tana Jones
	08/07/2000 10:52 AM
		
		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: weather confirm

I thought this was what we were already doing.  Sara, Mark, wasn't that your 
understanding?



	Brent Hendry@ENRON
	08/07/2000 10:45 AM
		
		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: weather confirm

When the Master does not have the weather modification to the Trade Option 
Exemption representation then I think we should include it in the confirm. Is 
this feasible?





	Tana Jones@ECT
	08/07/2000 10:25 AM
		 
		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent 
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: weather confirm

Tanya forwarded the attached confirm on to me.  Are we supposed to have that 
weather rep also in confirmations when we trade under a master?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 10:24 AM -----

	Tanya Rohauer
	08/07/2000 10:21 AM
		 
		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: weather confirm


---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 10:17 
AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Diane Anderson @ ENRON                           08/07/2000 10:09 AM
	

To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: weather confirm