The agreements haven't been executed, so please revise.  Could you also set 
me up a stand alone release, so that I can replace the release GE submitted 
on some of the other turbines?

Thanks,

Kay




"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 01/12/2001 10:28:07 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:  

Subject: RE: Fountain Valley/GE Facility Agreement

Will do.  I'll make the change in the remaining agreements.  Do you want
the revised form to be included in the Fountain Valley GE and ABB
Agreements (execution copies of which went out yesterday) or have those
agreements already been executed?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Cc: Pipitone, Paul; Cobb, Chris; alan.larsen@enron.com;
dale.rasmussen@enron.com; sheila.tweed@enron.com
Subject: RE: Fountain Valley/GE Facility Agreement



I agree.  Please revise the form accordingly.

Thanks,

Kay






"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 01/12/2001 09:35:53 AM

To:   <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
      <chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject:  RE: Fountain Valley/GE Facility Agreement


I have reviewed both the ABB and GE Agreements and have spoken to Paul
about this issue.  I do not believe it is necessary for the amount of
consideration to be listed in the final lien form. I believe that ABB
and GE can simply acknowledge that Seller has been paid in full or that
Purchaser has paid all sums owing to Seller under the agreement, or
similar language.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:24 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Cc: Alan. Larsen (E-mail); Kay Mann (E-mail); Sheila Tweed (E-mail);
Pipitone, Paul; Cobb, Chris
Subject: Re: Fountain Valley/GE Facility Agreement



Pete,

I have a question.  Is it necessary for the amount of consideration to
be
listed in the final lien form (exhibit R or S, something like that)?  If
so, what amount goes in there?  Will this defeat what we are trying to
do
in keeping the original price a supposed mystery?

Thanks,

Kay