Please explain the deletion of the provision precluding sharing of the
confidential information between Enron Comm and other Enron entities.  As
ISO indicated to you this is a key regulatory concern of theirs, and I do
not want to forward this until I understand Enron's position.

I believe that ISO will only accept California or New York law for their
agreements, but will check when I hear back from you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 4:10 PM
To: jtobin@mofo.com
Cc: Robin.Hill%ENRON.COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON.enron.net
Subject: Proposed Edits to NDA


Hi Jim:

Please find attached EBS's proposed modifications to the changes you
proposed.  Perhaps the biggest issue is which state's laws will govern.
We're open to Oregon, Delaware, or Texas.  California's a problem.  Let me
know what you think.

Best,
Jeff

(See attached file: Enron Response to ISO Comments on NDA.doc)

============================================================================

This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee),
you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information
contained in the message.  If you have received the message in error, please
advise the sender by reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.
Thank you very much.

============================================================================