I agree with lindy that non-physical points be excluded.

DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy  
Sent:	Friday, June 29, 2001 9:36 AM
To:	Betancourt, Ramona ; Licciardo, Jeanne; Ratliff, Dale; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Medeles, Gerry; Draemer, Mary ; Frazier, Perry
Subject:	RE: Operational/Design Capacity Requirements from Order 637

I think TW should exclude non-physical points.  This seems to be addressed in "What needs to be added" where it says "Listing all physical points valid for transport", but I'm sure it would clarify things to have that non-physical points should be excluded in the "What points to include" category. 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Betancourt, Ramona   
Sent:	Friday, June 29, 2001 8:34 AM
To:	Licciardo, Jeanne; Ratliff, Dale; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Donoho, Lindy; Medeles, Gerry; Draemer, Mary ; Frazier, Perry
Subject:	RE: Operational/Design Capacity Requirements from Order 637

Lindy,  Darrell, & Perry

After reviewing this list, should TW exclude non-physical points like NNG?

Lindy, this is the report that I was referencing in the notes from the meeting with Jeanne. I have copied Toby since he worked on this last year. Do you and Darrell and Perry agree?

Thanks Ramona

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Licciardo, Jeanne  
Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 5:15 PM
To:	Ratliff, Dale; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Donoho, Lindy; Medeles, Gerry; Betancourt, Ramona ; Draemer, Mary ; Frazier, Perry
Subject:	Operational/Design Capacity Requirements from Order 637

Please review the requirements from Order 637 to determine if changes need to made to the Opersational/Design reports posting to the web.

 << File: 637_opercap_matrix1.doc >>