One point you were checking was the CA.  Any luck?

I called pulled off track on a couple of things, but I can get back to this now.  Billy Fleenor says he has some thoughts on structure from a M-to-M standpoint.  Are you guys interested in having that conversation at this time?

Kay


From:	William Keeney/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/21/2001 01:18 PM
To:	Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:	 

Subject:	RE: NRG bullet points

Kay:

Any progress on drafting a letter of intent, or are you still waiting on feedback from the team?

Just let me know.  Thanks!
Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mann, Kay  
Sent:	Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:20 AM
To:	Manis, Herman; Fleenor, William
Cc:	May, Tom; Keeney, William; Marks, David; Scheuer, Janelle
Subject:	Re: NRG bullet points

Herman/Billy,

This is still very early in the process, but some thought as to structure options for earning recognition might be worthwhile.  

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/17/2001 09:17 AM ---------------------------

 
Kay Mann
05/16/2001 12:36 PM
To:	William Keeney/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Marks/ENRON@enronXgate, Janelle Scheuer/ENRON@enronXgate 

Subject:	Re: NRG bullet points   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >> 

I've made some revisions the Bill's document to make sure we are on the same page before I prepare the LOI.  

 << File: NRG Term Sheet.doc >> 

Do we want to give any sort of description of how the benchmark will be set?
Do we want to mention the cancellation provisions?

Thanks,

Kay






<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>