Dan Masters@ECT
04/12/2001 03:36 PM
To:	Tammy Gilmore/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Diane Ellstrom, Donnie Myers/NA/Enron@ENRON 

Subject:	Re: Gas at Trunkline Lake Charles

Tammy-

Since I never heard back from you I assume this is agreeable to you as well.  Please respond one way or the other so we can get the books closed.

Thanks,
Dan Masters
---------------------- Forwarded by Dan Masters/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001 03:28 PM ---------------------------


"Debbie A. Bradbury" <dabradbury@cmsenergy.com> on 04/09/2001 07:52:30 AM
To:	"Dan.Masters" <Dan.Masters@enron.com>
cc:	 
Subject:	Re: Gas at Trunkline Lake Charles



That would be fine with me to settle up in January, 2002. Thanks.





Dan.Masters@enron.com on 04/06/2001 05:43:24 PM

To:   Tammy.Gilmore@enron.com
cc:   "Debbie A. Bradbury" <dabradbury@cmsenergy.com>
Subject:  Re: Gas at Trunkline Lake Charles



The sendout for that April 16 delivery on the "Hoegh Galleon" begins on May
1, then is ratable through January 31, 2002 on the rest (5 more) of the
"Hoegh Galleon" cargoes.  I would be in favor of settling up at the end of
January for all 6 cargoes since we'll have overage/underage every month.
Let me know what you think.
Dan




 (Embedded
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Tammy Gilmore
 pic26173.pcx) 04/06/2001 02:40 PM






To:   "Debbie A. Bradbury" <dabradbury@cmsenergy.com>
cc:   Dan Masters/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  Re: Gas at Trunkline Lake Charles  (Document link: Dan Masters)

Trunkline just called me to tell me that we received 16,595 mmbtu too much
from LNG in the month of March.   There is another ship due to come in on
April 16th.   Trunkline has suggested that we take 16,595 less then what we
are expecting, in order to make up for the March imbalance.



"Debbie A. Bradbury" <dabradbury@cmsenergy.com> on 04/06/2001 02:07:43 PM

To:   "Dan.Masters" <Dan.Masters@enron.com>
cc:   "Tammy.Gilmore" <Tammy.Gilmore@enron.com>, "ghughes"
      <ghughes@cmsenergy.com>

Subject:  Re: Gas at Trunkline Lake Charles



Here is a spreadsheet showing your ending balance as of 3/31/01.

(See attached file: enron1lng.xls)




Dan.Masters@enron.com on 04/03/2001 01:08:52 PM

To:   Tammy.Gilmore@enron.com
cc:   ghughes@cmsenergy.com, dabradbury@cmsenergy.com,
      jeo'leary@cmsenergy.com
Subject:  Re: Gas at Trunkline Lake Charles



Tammy-
Following up on the email below, I show that between the two cargoes we
delivered, Enron LNG Marketing will be billing Enron North America for a
total of 5,759,994 MMBtu on our various contracts.  CMS Trunkline delivered
5,776,300 MMBtu of gas through the pipeline, or 16,306 MMBtu excess. This
16,306 MMBtu is to be handled directly between Trunkline and Enron North
America.
Please let me know if you disagree with any of these figures.
Dan




Dan Masters
02/28/2001 04:44 PM

To:   Tammy Gilmore/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:   ghughes@cmsenergy.com, dabradbury@cmsenergy.com
Subject:  Gas at Trunkline Lake Charles

Tammy-
I never heard back from Jim O'leary at Trunkline, but just to make sure we
are on the same page I wanted to confirm our quantities for this month.

From the "LNG Jamal" you should get 3,104,896 MMBtu total in March.  Please
have the contract for the last 51,396 MMBtu faxed to me at 713-646-6560.

From the "Matthew" you should get 2,720,000 MMBtu total in March.  This
number is approximate and will change to an exact number after arrival of
the "Matthew" around Mar 10, however I undertand the gas will be delivered
starting March 1 from Trunkline.

After we get the exact figure from the discharge of the "Matthew" I will
send out another email to show the total amount you will receive from us in
March.  Any quantities over or under this amount should be reconciled
between Enron North America and Trunkline.

Thanks and regards,
Dan Masters







(See attached file: enron1lng.xls)






(See attached file: pic26173.pcx)
(See attached file: enron1lng.xls)



 - pic26173.pcx 
 - enron1lng.xls