Steve -

I looked at the below language.  I guess I still have some concerns about the 
concept.

Why don't we go back to your original suggestion and delete the concept 
entirely.  I am sure if either party believes strongly enough that a breach 
has occurred, it will pursue its available remedies.

If this is acceptable, I will work off of the draft forwarded by Brenda and 
see if we can finalize a document for signature by Enron.

Please let me know if this will work.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com



	Steve.Barry@sabre.com
	04/05/2001 10:34 AM
	Please respond to Steve.Barry
		 
		 To: mark.greenberg@enron.com, Brenda Crabtree <brenda.crabtree@sabre.com>
		 cc: 
		 Subject: RESIDUAL KNOWLEDGE PROVISION


Mark, attached please find the proposed Residual Knowledge
provision that we discussed.  If acceptable, please advise
and I'll incorporate into the last version of the NDA.

Thanks,
Steve

--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This communication is intended solely for use by the
addressee and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under
applicable law. Unauthorized interception of this
communication violates the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. Any use,
dissemination or
copying of this communication other than by the addressee is
prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify the sender
and destroy the original and all copies of this
communication.


 - 1_Residual knowledge clause.doc