Let's discuss this prior to billing.  I agree that ENA owes us money, but there were certain conditions agreed to before we could get this capacity back!...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hanagriff, Richard  
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:26 PM
To:	Brown, Elizabeth; Mulligan, Amy
Cc:	Lokay, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Transwestern Capacity Release - ENA/Burlington 

Since ENA owes us $$$$$ I wouldn't think that we would send them $$$$$$.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Elizabeth  
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Mulligan, Amy; Hanagriff, Richard
Cc:	Lokay, Michelle
Subject:	FW: Transwestern Capacity Release - ENA/Burlington 
Importance:	High

FYI - When January 2002 invoices are run, please be advised that a manual adjustment will need to occur on ENA's contract 24924.  The deal was structured whereby TW would receive a marketing fee equal to 50% of the rate negotiated in excess of the original contracted rate between ENA and TW; the other 50% goes to ENA.

Here's the basics:
ENA's contract with TW is at a daily rate of $0.0600 (one-part)
The release to Burlington is at a daily rate of $0.0650 (demand only plus applicable commodity and fuel based on usage)
TW will bill Burlington through normal course of business (reservation of $34,125 [$0.0650 x 25,000 x 21days] plus applicable commodity fees)
ENA demand invoice will need to be adjusted so that they only receive a capacity release credit of $32,812.50  [($0.0650 - $0.0025) x 25,000 x 21days]
TW will need to book marketing fee revenues of $1,312.50 [$0.0025 x 25,000 x 21 days]  (Richard - do we need/have a separate account for these revenues??)

Michelle - I know you indicated that ENA is looking to get a payment of $1,312.50 for their portion of the incremental fee charged.  However, we will need to discuss further.  The invoice that will be generated to ENA will not represent a credit due them since we would still be billing them for the first 11 days prior to this release.  

We can discuss further when the billing cycle approaches.  If you have any questions, please let me know.

Elizabeth




 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Elizabeth  
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:27 AM
To:	Brown, Elizabeth; Giambrone, Laura; Hernandez, Bert; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Miller, Christopher; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ward, Linda; Donoho, Lindy; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; Watson, Kimberly; McConnell, Mark; Y'barbo, Paul; Blair, Lynn; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Cherry, Paul; Doll, Jeanette
Cc:	Dietz, Rick; Lee, Dennis; Eldridge, Dale; Williams, John
Subject:	RE: Transwestern Capacity Release Report for the period 1/1/2002 - 12/31/2003

As promised, please find the attached TW Capacity Release Report which has been revised to include a release from ENA to Burlington effective 1/11/02 - 1/31/02.  Let me know if you have any questions.

 << File: TW0102P.XLS >> 

Thanks,
Elizabeth


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Elizabeth  
Sent:	Monday, December 31, 2001 12:59 PM
To:	Giambrone, Laura; Hernandez, Bert; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Miller, Chris L; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ward, Linda; Donoho, Lindy; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; Watson, Kimberly; McConnell, Mark; Y'Barbo, Paul; Blair, Lynn; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Cherry, Paul; Bianchi, Rita
Cc:	Dietz, Rick; Lee, Dennis; Eldridge, Dale; Williams, John
Subject:	Transwestern Capacity Release Report for the period 1/1/2002 - 12/31/2003

Attached is the Transwestern Capacity Release Report that lists all capacity release transactions for the period effective 1/1/2002.  All transactions were awarded at 100% of the applicable maximum tariff rates.  

I have also been advised by Marketing that another posting may occur for January 2001 (partial month) but nothing has been finalized.  I will send an updated file if necessary.
  
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

 << File: TW0102P.XLS >> 


Thanks,
Elizabeth