Kim:

	We are doing this opinion in house, so as far as this opinion goes,
I am it.

Steven G. Lins
Assistant City Attorney
613 E. Broadway, Suite 220
Glendale, CA  91206
Tel(818)548-2080
Fax(818)547-3402
slins@ci.glendale.ca.us


-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston) [mailto:Kim.Ward@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 1:18 PM
To: slins@ci.glendale.ca.us
Subject: FW: City of Glendale


Steve,

could you provide the name, phone number, etc. of your bond council for
our attorney, Sara Shackleton?

Thanks,

Kim

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Shackleton, Sara
> Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 8:03 AM
> To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
> Cc:	Heard, Marie
> Subject:	RE: City of Glendale
>
> Kim:  Can you obtain the name of Glendale's bond counsel (lawyer's
> name, phone number, email, etc.)?  Thanks.  SS
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
> Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 1:59 PM
> To:	Shackleton, Sara
> Subject:	City of Glendale
>
> Sara,
>
> Believe it or not, we are very close getting our signed ISDA from the
> City of Glendale.  Steve Lins, the City attorney had a couple of
> questions which I will attempt to relay without having a copy of the
> documents.
>
> 1)  I am assuming that he obtained a for legal opinion letter or
> document of some sort.  This document references a confirmation and we
> are not sure what this references.  Typically, it references a
> transaction, which in this case, there are no transactions yet.  He
> feels this reference should be deleted.  What is your opinion
> regarding this? [Shackleton, Sara]    If we have no transaction on the
> books, then he can delete the reference.  Marie:  Have we received an
> opinion from Glendale?
>
> 2)  We sent him a couple of form documents to facilitate the documents
> required under the ISDA.  One form ws a form resolution.  They have
> already received City Council approval to enter into financial
> tranactions and to enter into an ISDA with us.  Steve is going to get
> a certified copy of this Resolution.  Will this suffice? [Shackleton,
> Sara]    I'll review their resolution again.  If it references our
> ISDA and all transactions, it should be fine.  (This is part of the
> reason why we need a legal opinion)
>
> When you return, I may try to do one last conference call to alleviate
> any unanswered questions.  I think we will have an executed ISDA with
> the City of Glendale by the end of next week.  I am going to be out
> there meeting with them on Wednesday.
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Kim


**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************