I think that is fine - the treasury group will just be acting at the
direction of ERMT and that's ordinary course.  Of course, the services
agreement should take care of all of that in the future when we have it
signed up.  We just might want to come up with an informal cash management
agreement in the interim such that ERMT would compensate ENE a nominal
amount for those services.

Also, Baker Botts has agreed to limit the prohibition on issuance of
subsidiary stock to "Significant Subsidiaries" within the meaning of S-X,
which I believe that swapco clearly would not be given the size of Enron.
So we should be OK on that front.



**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (214-746-7700), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.