Gina/David, I think we need to have some guidelines for these types of questions.  My view is that we should encourage people to be contacted while out on leave to identify reviewers and submit a self-evaluation.  Presumably, if they have a Click at Home PC, they can do it from there.  If not, we should be able to facilitate it manually.  Your thoughts?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001 09:10 AM -----


	Kim Cadena@EES 05/21/2001 06:15 PM 	   To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: PRC for individuals on leave	


Michelle,
I received the below message, but still have questions:

If someone has been on leave for less than 12 weeks, but is currently out, what should we do in terms of selecting reviewers for them?  Should the supervisor select?  What should we do in terms of the self evaluation of listing 5 accomplishments that will be flashed on the screen during PRC meetings?  Should we just leave theirs blank?  If it is blank will it be viewed as a negative?  Can the supervisor contact the individual at home to ask them who they want for reviewers and what do they want to put for 5 accomplishments?  If the employee knows that we are going through this process and wants to select reviewers and do their accomplishments from home, should we allow that since they are on leave? 

Sorry to throw all of these questions at you, but the EES HR group has thrown them at me and I agreed to send you one e-mail to keep from all of us contacting you.  
Also, I need to get information from you on what to do in submitting my list of PRC attendees to you for review in terms of diversity.  It would be helpful if I understood what exactly you want and what you are looking for.

Any gudance you can provide on these matters would be appreciated.



---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Cadena/HOU/EES on 05/21/2001 06:06 PM ---------------------------
From:	Teri Ashley/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/18/2001 10:07 AM
To:	Kim Cadena/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Chalk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development, Jana Domke/Corp/Enron@Enron, Belinda McGaughy/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Lee Brace/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Willie Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gerry Chatham/ENRON@enronXgate, Ann Vaughn/ENRON@enronXgate, Roger Sumlin/ENRON@enronXgate, Kathleen Blankenship/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, johnpa@nepco.com@SMTP@enronXgate, robinj@nepco.com@SMTP@enronXgate, gloriari@nepco.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Ron James/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	 
Subject:	FW: FW: Performance Review


NOTE - see below

Thanks
Teri

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cash, Michelle  
Sent:	Friday, May 18, 2001 9:08 AM
To:	xxxx
Cc:	Corteselli, Gina
Subject:	Re: FW: Performance Review

We have decided that someone who is out for more than 12 weeks during the review period should not be reviewed.  That guideline should be communicated to all of HR soon.  Michelle

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com