Brian_Grant@cargill.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

I might offer another simplistic solution that makes a whole lot more
sense in my mind:

Why doesn't the NYISO just separate their energy and transmission
markets?

-----Original Message-----
From: barkerde@nmenergy.com [mailto:barkerde@nmenergy.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 12:52 PM
To: nyiso_tech_exchange@global2000.net
Subject: Simplistic solution to physical vrs financial transmission??



barkerde@nmenergy.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:



What if a product called External Transmission Reservation Rights (ETRR)
was
conjured up that would allow a MP to reserve in/out ISONY transmission ?
MP's bid on 50 mw blocks for a month. The numbers of mws made available
is
variable. The winners get the blocks with a bid block attached. For
example ,on
the PJM/NY interface 100 mws of ETRR's  for exports were sold in two
blocks of
50. The winner's are given the bid blocks of 9999 and 9998 respectively.
The
highest anyone not owning a ETRR could bid on the external interfaces is
+/-
9900 thus insuring the assigned bid blocks first acceptance of their
bids. Thus
the winners of the ETRR's (having already paid the ISO for the space)
have the
ability to schedule the energy or not. Obviously this is an idea in the
most
simplistic form that will allow the purchasing of long term transmission
in a
financial transmission market. What do you think???