This looks like it belongs in the specs.  What do you think?

Kay


   
	
	
	From:  Scott Healy @ ECT                           11/02/2000 07:50 AM
	

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: FuelCell Power Plant - Area Classificaiton Issue


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Healy/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000 07:48 
AM ---------------------------


Stephen Plauche@ENRON
10/31/2000 08:03 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: FuelCell Power Plant - Area Classificaiton Issue

Kay,

 Please include Mike Nanny's verbiage below (on minimum design standards) in 
the Purchase Order Contract.  Please call with any questions.  Thanks.

Stephen
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron on 10/31/2000 
08:05 AM ---------------------------


Michael D Nanny@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/30/2000 06:21 PM
To: Stephen Plauche@ENRON
cc: Scott Healy@ECT, Dom Liu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gary 
Bush/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Terri 
Austin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 

Subject: FuelCell Power Plant - Area Classificaiton Issue

Sorry in the earlier transmittal I was interrupted and sent the message by 
mistake.  The red text below is what I added to insure that the minimum 
design standards are satisfied.  From the discussion this morning, the 
sensing instruments should or must be rated class I, div 2 and Fuelcell was 
not willing to state that minimum was included in their design basis.  The 
wording below should bring closure to this issue, when placed in the contract.

Mike Nanny
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael D Nanny/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 
10/30/2000 06:13 PM ---------------------------
   
	Enron Engineering & Construction Company
	From:  Dom LIu                           10/30/2000 02:06 PM
	

Sent by: Dom Liu
To: Michael D Nanny/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Terri Austin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 
Subject: FuelCell Power Plant - Area Classificaiton Issue


Mike:

This is the recommended verbiage to address area classification issues:

The electrical system design and installation shall be in compliance with the 
requirement of NFPA 70 (NEC), in particular, Article 500 with respect to 
Hazardous Locations.  The classification of locations shall be as recommended 
by API RP 500 (Recommended Practice for Classification of Locations for 
Electrical Installations at Petroleum Facilities.)  The design compliance 
with the NFPA requirements shall be demonstated in a design review or HAZOP 
review meeting which includes representatives of Enron North America in the 
review process.

Regards,

Dom