Interesting points.  However, I don't ever recall you agreeing with every 
Commission decision on disallowances.  And I know you wouldn't establish 
differing standards for IOUs and state water agencies.  

I just hope that this isn't the tip of the iceberg.  

You really think that Campbell is a dim bulb?  A Republican, yes, but I 
haven't heard anyone else describe him as a dim bulb.

Best,
Jeff



	Mike Florio <mflorio@turn.org>
	07/24/2001 05:40 PM
		 
		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: Figures show state lost big on extra power


Shame on you, Jeff!  I expect this sort of thing from inexperienced 
reporters and dim bulbs like Campbell.  But you KNOW that this sort of 
thing is no big deal.  And when did the PUC ever disallow these kinds of 
losses for the utilities?  I don't think my memory has gotten that bad.   MIKE



At 03:20 PM 7/24/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>FYI.  Many similar stories in the major papers today.
>
>Best,
>
>
>Jeff
>
>
>Figures show state lost big on extra power
>
>
>Posted at 9:53 p.m. PDT Monday, July 23, 2001
>
>
>BY JOHN WOOLFOLK
>
>
>Mercury News
>
>
>State figures show California may have lost about $14 million this month
>selling surplus electricity for less than it cost.
>
>
>The Mercury News disclosed last week that some power was being sold at a
>loss. But the new figures provide the first indication of just how much
>excess power the state bought in its desperate effort to avoid blackouts --
>and how cheaply some of that power was sold when it turned out not to be
>needed.
>
>
>A Republican lawmaker said Monday the loss also shows Democratic Gov. Gray
>Davis' energy policies are needlessly costing consumers.
>
>
>``This whole thing is a mess,'' said Assemblyman John Campbell, R-Irvine,
>who requested details of the state's surplus power sales. ``The government
>needs to get out of the power business before it costs Californians even
>more money.''
>
>
>A state spokesman didn't dispute the $14 million figure outright but said
>it is an approximation based on average prices and that the actual loss
>probably is less.
>
>
>``It's a number I'm sure he likes very much, but it's definitely an
>estimated number, and it could be far lower,'' said Oscar Hidalgo,
>spokesman for the state Department of Water Resources.
>
>
>Campbell responded that the loss also could be higher.
>
>
>The state has spent $415 million on power so far this month.
>
>
>State officials last week confirmed that cool weather and consumer
>conservation have left California holding more power than it needs. The
>revelation was a stunning turnaround for a state that months ago was paying
>top dollar for power, expecting shortages this summer.
>
>
>Price that was paid
>
>
>The state bought 3.5 million megawatt-hours of electricity for July at an
>average price of $118 per megawatt-hour, according to a response Friday by
>the Department of Water Resources to Campbell's inquiry. The state has sold
>178,000 surplus megawatt-hours in July at an average price of $37, the
>department said.
>
>
>Based on those average prices, the state paid $21 million for the surplus
>power, which it sold for $6.5 million -- $14.5 million less than it cost.
>
>
>A more precise calculation of the state's loss is difficult because
>purchased power is acquired at different times and prices and pooled as a
>``portfolio.''
>
>
>Purchases included long-term contracts that averaged $138 per megawatt-hour
>as well as cheaper spot-market buys.
>
>
>State officials last week said they were selling surplus at $15 to $30 a
>megawatt-hour, while some traders cited unconfirmed sales as low as $1.
>
>
>Hidalgo noted that the surplus sales represent just 5 percent of
>California's July purchases, which totaled $415 million. The $6.5 million
>from sales will help lower the state's power bill, he said, adding that
>utilities routinely sell some extra electricity.
>
>
>``Despite the fact that we're in somewhat of a surplus, any power-buying
>operation in the world is going to have to plan for these types of
>situations,'' Hidalgo said. ``It's not unique, and in fact it's normal
>operating procedure for any utility.''
>
>
>Other Western utilities, including Portland General Electric in Oregon,
>have said they, too, are selling some surplus power at a loss and describe
>it as a cost of doing business.
>
>
>The suppliers buying the state's surplus electricity on the cheap include
>the big out-of-state energy companies that the governor has called
>price-gouging ``snakes.'' Among them are Duke Energy, Dynegy Power and
>Marketing, El Paso Power Services, Mirant, Reliant Energy and Williams
>Energy.
>
>
>`Best bid' taken
>
>
>Hidalgo said the state took the best offers it could find.
>
>
>``It's only reasonable to get the best bid you can,'' he said.
>
>
>Campbell said the $14 million loss is troubling because ratepayers or
>taxpayers will have to cover the cost, whereas a private utility could be
>forced to eat the expense if regulators determined it was unreasonable.
>
>
>State officials say what's more important is that the overall cost of power
>is dropping, from an average daily tab of $64 million in May to $25 million
>this month, in part because the state has so much power.
>
>
>Contact John Woolfolk at jwoolfolk@sjmercury.com <
>mailto:jwoolfolk@sjmercury.com> or (408) 278-3410.