Mark:

You never assigned this one.  Attached is the EOL list.  Chase merged with JP Morgan and we need to upgrade/select existing master.

 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)  
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 7:01 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara; Koehler, Anne C.
Subject:	FW: The Chase Manhattan Bank - EOL 

Both of you are listed in Lotus Notes on this one.  Not sure who has had most recent contact.  I someone working on a no-confirms agreement for Chase already?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anderson, Diane  
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Cc:	Shackleton, Sara; Theriot, Kim S.; Mulvany, Patrick
Subject:	The Chase Manhattan Bank - EOL 

Mark,

Following a discrepancy with an incorrect confirm generated and executed for an EOL deal between ENA and Chase, Dutch Quigley on the Enron Gas desk has spoken with Greg Crowley, a Chase trader, and Cecile Taylor-Simpson (their confirms Manager) - and agreed that they would all like Enron to be the confirming party for EOL deals between us.  (Presently Chase is the Confirming Party for financial commodity confirms).

Can we, and do we want to, revise their Master Agreement to reflect this?  I thought perhaps this would be a good opportunity to try to get Chase to execute the EOL Amendment.  

Please advise.
Thanks,
Diane
3.0443