seems to address all important considerations. i would vote (manually) for a 
consistent apporach across all ETS managed activities. however i think it 
will receive resistence by selected project engineers - who tend to anly take 
respeonsiblity for a single facet of a project and not the whole project; and 
may think it slow down an already slow approval process




Rod Hayslett

11/20/2000 07:27 AM
To: Denis Tu/FGT/Enron@ENRON, David Rosenberg/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James 
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Waymire/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cheryl 
Perchal/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Statement of Work Template, Etc.

What do you think about using something like this proposal for most of our 
major projects (over $1.0 MM), could even go lower?   This has been proposed 
by Morris specifically for EOTT projects, but there is no reason to exclude 
others.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 11/20/2000 
07:25 AM ---------------------------

11/15/2000 10:09 AM
Morris Brassfield
Morris Brassfield
Morris Brassfield
11/15/2000 10:09 AM
11/15/2000 10:09 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Statement of Work Template, Etc.

What do you think about using this proposed document for approving any EOTT 
project that is outside the approved Project budget plan?


Here's my attempt at the template: