Got it.  The sure-fire way to get me is at "jdasovic@enron.com."  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff



	"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	10/19/2000 10:37 AM
		 
		 To: <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Fwd: Email Glitch

Jeff, let me know if you receive this message.  Sue Mara asked me to copy you 
on all emails to the WPTF Board, but I have recently been having everything 
returned for you.  Hope all is well.
 
Dan
----- Message from "Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com> on Thu, 19 
Oct 2000 11:32:55 -0400 -----
To:	"Barbara Klemstine" <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, "Bob Anderson" 
<Bob_Anderson@apses.com>, "Robert Berry" <berry@apx.com>, "Denice Cazalet" 
<dcazalet@apx.com>, "Bill Ross" <billr@calpine.com>, "Jack Pigott" 
<jackp@calpine.com>, "Gene Waas" <glwaas@calpx.com>, "Ken Czarnecki" 
<Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>, "Carolyn Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Randy 
Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Greg Blue" <GTBL@dynegy.com>, "Kent 
Wheatland" <KEWH@dynegy.com>, "Jeff Dasovich" <j_dasovi@ect.enron.com>, 
"Roger Pelote" <rpelote@energy.twc.com>, "Susan Mara" 
<susan_j_mara@enron.com>, "Curt Hatton" <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Gary 
Ackerman" <foothill@lmi.net>, "CHARLES A MIESSNER" 
<camiessn@newwestenergy.com>, "Corby Gardiner" <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, 
"Rob Nichol" <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, "Curtis Kebler" 
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Rob Lamkin" 
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Carl Imparato" <cfi1@tca-us.com>
Subject:	Email Glitch
Have just discovered that some emails sent to the board earlier this week did 
not go through and got hung up in cyberspace.  Most dealt with the emergency 
petitions for modification filed by Edison and PG&E and the data request for 
financial information which ALJ Minkin issued.  This is the first, which went 
out on Monday:
 
SDG&E has filed an initial response to ALJ Minkin's Ruling which first 
requests that the utility should not be subject to the information request 
which stemmed from the SCE and PG&E emergency petitions.  If the Commission 
is unwilling to do so, the utility next informs the Commission of its 
intention not to respond fully to the request.  The crux of the opposition is 
as follows: 
 
"However, neither Rule 1 nor the Public Utilities Code require SDG&E to waive 
certain fundamental due process rights pertaining to its discovery 
obligations.  Specifically, simply because the information is requested in an 
ALJ ruling as opposed to alternative discovery mechanisms does not require 
SDG&E to produce confidential, proprietary, competitively sensitive 
information belonging to its affiliates which information is neither 
pertinent to a transaction between SDG&E and an affiliate nor in the 
possession of SDG&E.  A number of the informational demands in the ALJ Ruling 
fall squarely within this context and therefore are not appropriate for 
discovery purposes."
 
The utility then states that:
 
"In an effort to cooperate with the Commission and the ALJ to provide for 
Commission inspection relevant information reasonably calculated to lead to 
the discovery of admissible evidence, SDG&E will provide affiliate 
information responsive to the ALJ,s informational demands to the extent that 
the information relates to a transaction with SDG&E (i.e. falls within the 
scope of PUC section 314(b)), the information is public information (not 
confidential and proprietary to the affiliate), or the information is a 
matter of public record."
 
SDG&E responses to information demands a, b, c, d, f, g, i, k, q, and bb were 
attached to the filing and will be provided to other parties who request them 
(I have requested a copy be sent to us) [Note...it has arrived].  Finally, 
the utility then itemizes the following items of information which it will 
not provide:
 
"m. An itemization of funds paid to and amounts billed by the California PX 
by each utility affiliate for each month in 2000;
n. An itemization of funds paid to and amounts billed by the California ISO 
by each utility affiliate for each month in 2000;
p. An itemization of funds paid to and amounts billed by any entity other 
than the California ISO or PX for power purchased in California by each 
utility affiliate; [under the assumption that "any entity" includes SDG&E, 
the information related to any SDG&E transaction(s) will be provided] 
r. An itemization of revenues received from the California PX for power 
purchase sales in California by utility affiliates for each month in l999 and 
2000;
t. Revenues received from the California ISO for power purchase sales in 
California by utility affiliates for each month in l999 and 2000;
v. An itemization of revenues received from entities other than the 
California PX and the California ISO for power purchase sales in California 
by utility affiliates for each month in l999 and 2000; [under the assumption 
that "any entity" includes SDG&E, the information related to any SDG&E 
transaction(s) will be provided] 
x. Revenues received for power purchase sales in any state other than 
California by each utility affiliate for each month in l999 and 2000;
y. A description of all utility affiliates, activities in California electric 
markets, including marketing, scheduling, selling, or purchasing electricity 
either independently or jointly with other entities; [under the assumption 
that "any entities" includes SDG&E, the information related to any SDG&E 
transaction(s) will be provided; we will also provide public information 
related to those "activities" such as press releases, etc.; since no time 
frame has been provided related to this information request, we will respond 
concerning activities beginning January 1, 1998]
z. A description of each energy facility purchased wholly or in part by the 
utility or any of its affiliates in l997-2000, including its purchase price 
and location; [we will provide any public information addressing affiliate 
purchases as well as all information, including confidential, proprietary 
information related to a transaction with SDG&E]
aa. A description of each energy facility or portion thereof sold by the 
utility or any of its affiliates in l997-2000, including its sale price and 
location; [we will provide any public information addressing affiliate sales 
as well as all information, including confidential, proprietary information 
related to a transaction with SDG&E]
cc. A copy of the most recent business plan for itself, its holding company 
and each of its affiliates. [we will provide copies of those portions of 
affiliate or holding company business plans that discuss or describe 
transactions with SDG&E]
The basis of SDG&E,s objection to produce the foregoing information is that 
the information exceeds the scope of the Commission,s statutory authority to 
require production of affiliate information under PUC section 314(b); the 
information is not relevant to any proceeding currently before the 
Commission; the information is not reasonably calculated to result in the 
discovery of admissible evidence in any Commission proceeding; and the 
information is not in the possession of, nor is it proprietary to, SDG&E."
 
After doing a comparison of the list of items for which responses are being 
provided with the list for which objections are raised, I noted that items e, 
h, j, l, o, s, u and w are simply not mentioned.  I have sent an email to 
their counsel asking for the status of those requests.  Let me know if you 
want a copy of the SDG&E filing.
 
Dan