We need to keep in mind the 30 day deadline to provide notice.  We don't want 
to give them any room to wiggle. We can always send another notice later.

Kay


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Mark Dobler                           07/28/2000 11:48 AM
	

To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron 

Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL  

Mitch/Kay -

I would include reference to two (2) major issues, the one stated on the unit 
non-performance at varying ambient temperatures and second being excessive 
vibration.  The rest of the letter looks fine.

MSD

 


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Mitch Robinson                           07/28/2000 11:09 AM
	

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Dobler/NA/Enron@Enron 

Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL  

Kay -

Not yet.  I wanted to wrap up the repairs on unit 1 first to see if we should 
add that to the mix.  Now that Mark is back, I'd like him (vice Mike Miller) 
to be the signer.

Mark, thoughts on the attached?

Mitch


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Kay Mann                           07/28/2000 11:02 AM
	

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron 

Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL  

Mitch,

Has the letter gone out?  

Kay


From: Richard B Sanders@ECT on 07/23/2000 09:24 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron 

Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL  

If this letter has not yet gone out, we should include the kitchen sink of 
perceived problems. I agree that the letter should be short, but lets 
eliminate their argument that we did not give complete notice.



	Kay Mann@ENRON
	07/13/2000 12:13 PM
		 
		 To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL

Mitch,

Here's a first draft.  Please suggest any additional complaints/shortfalls 
which we need to raise.  It is better to be all inclusive than leave 
something out.



Richard, any ideas or comments?

Kay