Raetta, have we taken care of this?  Thanks. Lynn

-----Original Message-----
From: Stevens, Bob 
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Blair, Lynn
Cc: January, Steve; Zadow, Raetta
Subject: RE: Receipt Points


Raetta or Lynn:  Is there no way for them to designate all of their fuel from Marshall?

-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Lynn 
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 4:36 PM
To: Stevens, Bob
Cc: January, Steve; Zadow, Raetta; Blair, Lynn
Subject: RE: Receipt Points


	Bob, you are correct in your statement.  But I want to be sure Koch understand
	when they nominate their receipt at Carlton of 2828 the delivery on that
	path will be 2828 less fuel.  Otherwise I agree with you statements.  I will
	be out next week, but Raetta is up to speed on this issue if you have any
	questions.  Thanks. Lynn

-----Original Message-----
From: Stevens, Bob 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Blair, Lynn
Subject: FW: Receipt Points


Lynn:  Please verify that if Koch realigns their 35,000/d contract (K# 20510)such that their MDQ at Carlton matches their Carlton flow obligation of 2,828 and has the rest of their 32,172/d at Marshall (They would need to realign 30 mcf from Carlton to Marshall to effectuate the above, and I've checked with Doug Aschwege to make sure he would approve it.) that Steve's and my interpretation as described below is correct.  Basically the question is whether the Carlton flow obligation is only the Tariff stated volume (ie., no fuel imputed) and that the remainder of the MDQ plus fuel on the whole 35,000/d will flow as primary firm receipts at Marshall.  Thanks for your help!

-----Original Message-----
From: Phillips, Steve (EKT) [mailto:Steve.Phillips@entergykoch.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:25 PM
To: Stevens, Bob
Subject: Receipt Points


Bob, 

Per our conversations earlier this month,  My contract 20510 needs to have
only 2828 mmbtu at Carlton and 32172 at Marshall.  All of the fuel for the
transport needs to be taken from Marshall.  Currently, this contract has
2858 at Carlton.  This is 30 above my obligation.  After this change is
made, it is my expectation that under no circumstances will my volume at
Carlton be curtailed below a receipt volume of 32568 at Marshall.   A
combination of 2828 plus 32568 gives me a delivered volume of 35000.  That
is my firm entitlement and curtailments below that are unacceptable as long
as my nominations are primary FT.

Please contact me at 713-544-4017 if more clarification is needed.

Thank you.  

Steve Phillips