Scott, etal --

My final concern.  

Is anyone at EES concerned with this outcome --  
(1) Accept EES' tiering but use 60% of current usage as baseline, 
(2) all above 60% is DJ Index, and 
(3) demand below 60% is paid at $500/Mwh (or the ISO price)?  

This is an adaption of our proposal.  Would this be painful?  

My big fear is that somehow the CPUC uses our filing against us.  We need to 
make sure that these discussions don't get away from us to allow that outcome.

Jim





Scott Stoness@EES
04/13/2001 12:00 PM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James D 
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, jbennett@gmssr.com@ENRON, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, 
Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie 
Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES
cc:  

Subject: Meeting 8AM Central Monday

We have agreed on a strategy, subject to Whaley/Delaney approval, to:
Scott Stoness submit testimony today advocating 2 part real time pricing in CA
Read other parties testimony this weekend from the perspective "Has somebody 
filed testimony close enough to Stoness testimony, that we can cross examine 
and brief to a favorable outcome?"
Meet on Monday at 8AM to decide whether to rescind Stoness's testimony.

The following dial in number and code corresponds to the Monday 8AM Central 
Time meeting.
1 800 713 8600
68266 is PIN
Scott Stoness is host

Action Items:
All on To list above read and have opinion on 2 and 3 above
All on To list above meet on Monday at 8AM.  Meet in Stoness office if 
possible.
Harry and Jeane polish Stoness testimony and wait to the last minute before 
submitting it
Jeane ensure all on this To list get a copy of testimony, emailed as soon as 
she gets it.

Scott Stoness