Yes-- but lets wait until you and I can talk live.




	Andrew Edison@ENRON 06/07/2001 02:48 PM 	   To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: RE: Quinque	


Let's talk.  Can we shift some more of the cost to ETS???


----- Forwarded by Andrew Edison/NA/Enron on 06/07/2001 02:47 PM -----


	Drew Fossum/ENRON@enronXgate 06/07/2001 01:51 PM 	   To: Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Staci Holtzman/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: Dorothy McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: RE: Quinque	


Great!  Now, what have you done for me lately?  The ETS entities are apparently still in this case and I'm feeling lonely already now that ENA is bugging out.  Where is our deal with Boies to get Quinn in and us out?  Thanks for the help on this Andy.  DF

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Edison, Andrew  
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 12:35 PM
To:	Fossum, Drew; Holtzman, Staci
Subject:	Quinque

I am glad to report that we have received word from Rex Sharp, the plaintiffs' lawyer in the Quinque litigation, that he intends to dismiss Enron North America Corp. from this litigation.  We provided Rex with an affidavit explaining that ENA is not a first measurer of gas, and he let us know this morning that as a result, he does not intend to pursue ENA.  I will believe it when I see the amended petition, which should be filed by the close of business tomorrow.  

I will keep you updated.

Andy