3 is better.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>@ENRON  
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 12:59 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: Conference Call on Tuesday

We have another EPSA call scheduled at 2--  how does 3 or 3:30 EST look?

>>> <James.D.Steffes@enron.com> 10/26/01 11:55AM >>>
How about 2pm EST - 1pm CST?

Jim

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>@ENRON
   Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 10:44 AM
   To:     Steffes, James D.
   Subject:  Conference Call on Tuesday

   Jim,
   Julie wants to hold a conference call on Tuesday, October 30th to
   discuss the possibility of designing and undertaking cost-benefit
   analyses to support FERC's RTO policies.  She wants to have you on the
   call & would like to know when you would be available.  Anytime after
   1:00 p.m. EST would probably be best for her.  If you could let me know
   ASAP I will be able to send out an email to those she thinks should be
   on the call.  Thanks, Jim.

   Jackie Gallagher




**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************