Attached below is a copy of the meeting notes from the Field UAF meeting.
 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kneisley, George  
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:51 PM
To:	Jolly, Rich; Bailey, Arnie; Smith, Rick; Roensch, David; Thompson, Charlie; Cessac, Kenneth; Clark, Scott
Cc:	Tanner, Ben; Williams, Sammy; Kile, Rick; Foutz, Lawrence; Chanley, Earl
Subject:	update to TW meas. audits

Gents:  we've audited approx. 33 measurement stations in the past 3 months; the attached spreadsheet 
contains only the "open" issues, yet to be resolved.  We think we identified the "culprit" for TW excess uaf 
with the leaking valve issue at Bloomfield Hub; keep in mind that was resolved on 7/10/01. 

 
 
 July (total system) was a +93,332 mcf gain====0.16%
 August (total system) was a +67,996 mcf gain = 0.11% 

We think the TW uaf numbers are holding around zero (+/- 0.1%); for August, the segments look very "tight":

	West Texas Lateral===TO1===13,380 mcf gain===0.04%
	Panhandle Lateral====TO2===23,074 mcf gain===0.63%
	Mainline Lateral======TO3===31,524 mcf gain===0.06%

If stations would hold steady flows, maybe we could identify some type of trend; but, they don't==they're
up and down, on and off====therefore, each station has bias that can swing the uaf (+ or -) around zero.

Our next plan was to audit stations with volumes between 10,000 and 50,000 mcf/day (approx. 25 stations);  
our question is ==== do we continue with the plan, or let it ride for a couple of months and see what happens??
These audits consume a lot of time for all involved, so we're looking for work direction===

Your suggestions, comments plz