that was today... I had heard they were sniffing around about optionality values?  

It is not in the agreement. just a question. 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whitt, Mark  
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:18 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: EPNG Proposal II

We decide to leave out the $ value in order to focus them on the structure.  I do not see the conversation about option values on the pipe?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry  
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:10 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	FW: EPNG Proposal II

I thought we were going to show them a number to work with.... What is this conversation about option values on the pipe?  

BT 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald  
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 4:37 PM
To:	Fuller, Dave; Whitt, Mark
Cc:	Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: EPNG Proposal II

Attached is the document with one change. 

 << File: EPNG Capacity Proposal II1.doc >> 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fuller, Dave  
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 2:56 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Cc:	Nemec, Gerald; Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	EPNG Proposal II

All,

Here is a draft document for BP, please review and comment.

Dave

 << File: EPNG Capacity Proposal II.doc >>