Why would PGT do that????  If there was that much demand, you'd think they 
would have been able to extract a neg. rate deal for something north of max 
for a shorter term.  Maybe that shipper demanded the recourse rate.  Weird.  
By the way--good memo to Shelley on Red Rock.  df





From: Jeffery Fawcett/ENRON@enronxgate on 02/22/2001 03:49 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/LON/ECT@Enron, Lorna 
Brennan/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan 
Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Lorraine Lindberg/Enron@enronXgate, TK 
Lohman/ENRON@enronxgate, Michelle Lokay/ENRON@enronXgate, Kimberly 
Watson/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:  

Subject: PGT-NW expansion

Rumor on the street is that the entire 200 MMcf/d of capacity in the PGT-NW 
expansion went to one shipper who offered max. rates for 35 years.