FYI.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:36 PM
To: Vicki Sandler; Tamara Johnson; Mara, Susan; Steve Huhman; Roger Pelote; Rob Nichol; Randy Hickok; Nam Nguyen; Jim Crossen; Dasovich, Jeff; Janie Mollon; Jack Pigott; Greg Blue; George Vaughn; Gary Ackerman; Ed Cazalet; Denice Cazalet Purdum; Curtis Kebler; Curt Hatton; Corby Gardiner; Charles Miessner; Carolyn Baker; Bill Ross; Karen Shea; Max Bulk; ARM
Subject: CLECA/CIU/SVMG


CLECA, CIU and the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group have also come out with all guns blazing against the draft decision dealing with the DWR revenue requirement.  They decry the lack of hearings, state that there are fundamental untruths in the decision and conclude that, "The DWR has made it clear that it needs to have a decision on its revenue requirements quickly so that it can successfully issue bonds to generate revenue to re-pay the general fund.  No one has been permitted to test that proposition, but it seems to be accepted as fact by decision makers.  The problem is that this record does not support approval of any particular revenue requirement for DWR and it certainly does not support the allocation proposed in the DD.  If the Commission must act quickly, then it must act provisionally and set for further hearings the many questions identified here and, we suspect, in the comments of many other interested parties concerning the basis of the allocation among the utilities."
 
Dan
 
Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com <mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com>