I need a Heather deal to work on.

Good luck in Conn!

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/29/2001 09:36 
AM ---------------------------
From: David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 09:18 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate, Heather 
Kroll/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom May/ENRON@enronXgate, Kayne 
Coulter/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:  

Subject: RE: ILA/ESMA conflicts

Kay -- We should check each on a case by case basis.  We probably would be 
better off using any definition from the ILA since it was already found to be 
acceptable by MDEA unless there is simply a better definition in the ESMA or 
some inherent conflict or gap relative to the scope of the overall 
agreement.  For any that are not obvious to you, please do not hesitate to 
continue shooting questions at us for clarification.  Should we look at 
Ancillary Services?   Thanks -- David

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay  
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:25 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan; Fairley, David; Kroll, Heather; May, Tom; Coulter, 
Kayne
Subject: ILA/ESMA conflicts

What is your preference when there is a  conflict between the interim 
agreement and the last draft (v23) of the ESMA.  (For instance, the 
definition of ancillary services.)  Shall I just ignore the ILA, or does it 
represent the customers' expectations?

Kay