no.  Let me try and catch up with Rich.'

DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine  
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:06 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:	FW: NGPL Eddy Co.

Darrell - Did you ever find out what we have on the Atoka points regarding sulfur monitor?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jolly, Rich  
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Lindberg, Lorraine; Frazier, Perry
Cc:	Bailey, Arnie
Subject:	RE: NGPL Eddy Co.

Lorraine after looking over what volumes we'll be receiving we'll be needing a total sulphur instrument at this location. I understand NGPL has one at the Indian Basin Plant which is an Old Barton Recorder type. These type of instruments will not pick up all the sulphur we're experiencing out of the field in that area. We have instruments that will pick up butyl sulphur along with many others that most other companies equipment can't read at this time. We're also experiencing large amounts of butyl which is a major problem for us in the Atoka field. By receiving this into our system we're having to batch or inject corrosion inhibitor's in our pipelines for protection. This is a cost to operations that we need to get a handle on. Thanks for your help in this matter
RJ
---------------------- Forwarded by Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron on 10/02/2001 02:18 PM ---------------------------

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> 
Rich Jolly
10/02/2001 11:07 AM
To:	Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Perry Frazier/ENRON@enronXgate, "lkunkel@trigon-sheehan.com@ENRON" <IMCEANOTES-lkunkel+40trigon-sheehan+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Earl Chanley/ENRON@enronXgate, Darrell Schoolcraft/ENRON@enronXgate, Team Artesia/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dennis Alters/ENRON@enronXgate 

Subject:	RE: NGPL Eddy Co.   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >> 

Perry I agree with Arnie and the team. In order to keep our pipelines in good shape we need to know what we are receiving, especially from these larger delivery points. It seems like every time we agree to something different than what we require operations has to go back to marketing for dollars or put in equipment to correct the situation. We're trying to cover all bases up front so this doesn't happen in the future.
Thanks
RJ


   
 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> 	  From:  Arnie Bailey                           10/01/2001 02:59 PM	
		


To:	Perry Frazier/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	"lkunkel@trigon-sheehan.com@ENRON" <IMCEANOTES-lkunkel+40trigon-sheehan+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Earl Chanley/ENRON@enronXgate, Darrell Schoolcraft/ENRON@enronXgate, Team Artesia/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dennis Alters/ENRON@enronXgate, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject:	RE: NGPL Eddy Co.   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >> 

Perry,
The Artesia Team and I still have concerns about having no total sulfur monitor at the location.  We are already taking gas that has high total sulfur at Atoka 2.  Since we have started using sulfur instruments that pick up Butyl Sulfur, we are almost always over .75 grains at Atoka 2 into the West Texas lateral.  The instruments that NGPL uses at the Indian Basin plant may not see Butyl Sulfurs.  If this it the case, we may have the same problem that we have at Atoka 2.  If we don't have enough other inputs to blend the gas, this can become a quality problem for deliveries at other locations. 
Since this is a 50mmcfd input to our system, I sure think we need the protection.
Thanks,  Arnie


From:	Perry Frazier/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/28/2001 10:48 AM CDT
To:	"lkunkel@trigon-sheehan.com@ENRON" <IMCEANOTES-lkunkel+40trigon-sheehan+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Earl Chanley/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Darrell Schoolcraft/ENRON@enronXgate, Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Artesia/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dennis Alters/ENRON@enronXgate 

Subject:	RE: NGPL Eddy Co.

Laura & Earl:

Planning and Gas Control can accept control valve operation by NGPL, which is included in the current drawings.  The installation of 2 control would give us problems with them fighting each other.  We have an OBA with NGPL, and we will monitor their future compliance to volume requirements.   We might have to address in this in the future if the fail to comply, but for now we're okay.

NGPL has basically the same tariff as TW and they feel protected from total sulfur at the tailgate of the Indian Basin Plant.  The Delmar H2S at the NGPL/TW point  will protect us both from H2S.  We may want to grab a sample from the IB plant to baseline the current sulfur content and verify accuracy.  Darrell and myself are comfortable with the current plans, to not install total sulfur at our interconnect with NGPl.  The cost of this new instrument is around $40,000 and I don't believe either company has plans to replace,  NGPL total sulfur instrument.

Arnie and Terry, please review and let us know if Operations can comply with our findings.  I am sure this can be resolve to our mutual agreement.  

PTF  713-853-0667


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	lkunkel@trigon-sheehan.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-lkunkel+40trigon-sheehan+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:28 PM
To:	Frazier, Perry
Subject:	FW: NGPL Eddy Co.


Here are the meeting notes.  ljk
 <<mtg notes on NGP Eddy IC.doc>>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Laura Kunkel
> Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:21 PM
> To:	'Perry.Frazier@enron.com'
> Cc:	Earl Chanley (E-mail)
> Subject:	NGPL Eddy Co.
>
> PT;  Attached are the notes from the meeting with NGPL, aka Kinder Morgan,
> at the NGPL Eddy County Interconnect yesterday.  Earl has asked me to
> submit a work order for TW's work on this project and before I do that, I
> need some answers on the marketing issues that we discussed on the phone
> yesterday.  Mainly,  I need to know if I should plan on using NGPL's valve
> for flow control, or if I should plan to install a new one.
> 	Would it be possible to have an answer on that by the close of
> business tomorrow?  NGPL has a required in-service date of 12-30-01 and
> are planning to have everything ready to flow gas by 12-15-01, which
> doesn't give us much time to get a flow control valve ordered, if one is
> required, not to mention the Bristol.
> Laura J. Kunkel
> Project Manager
> Trigon-Sheehan, LLC
> 505/627-9124
> lkunkel@trigon-sheehan.com
>

 - mtg notes on NGP Eddy IC.doc << File: mtg notes on NGP Eddy IC.doc >>