Charlie,

I agree. The settlement is an agreed upon measurement number. Not an agreed upon difference.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dornan, Dari  
Sent:	Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:48 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Cessac, Kenneth; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley
Subject:	RE: Northern vs. Oneok:  Oneok measurement settlement

Charlie sent me the following message.
"If the intent is to calculate the average between the two sets of numbers (NNG's vs ONEOK's) the "settlement number" would be 567,546.5!"
As the settlement document states that the blank number is what we are going to use for "PTR", I think Charlie is correct.  His number takes the average between the Plant PTR calculation and Northern's number.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn  
Sent:	Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:05 AM
To:	Dornan, Dari; Cessac, Kenneth; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley
Cc:	Blair, Lynn
Subject:	RE: Northern vs. Oneok:  Oneok measurement settlement

	Dari, Harry and I have run through the numbers and how we will show the difference on the
	books and agree with your number. Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dornan, Dari  
Sent:	Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:14 AM
To:	Cessac, Kenneth; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Blair, Lynn; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley
Subject:	RE: Northern vs. Oneok:  Oneok measurement settlement

So the settlement number will be 8,624.50 MMBtu.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cessac, Kenneth  
Sent:	Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:10 AM
To:	Dornan, Dari; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Blair, Lynn; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley
Subject:	RE: Northern vs. Oneok:  Oneok measurement settlement

Dari,

Listed below are the volumes from plant PTR and NNG calculated PTR based on inlet/outlet measurement for September 12 - 17.  The Plant PTR values were obtained from a letter from ONEOK  to Harry Woodson dated November 1, 2001.  This information may help in determining the settlement volume for this time period.


Date		Plant PTR		NNG PTR		Difference
9/12/2001	88,335			90,910			2,575
9/13/2001	92,175			95,968			3,793
9/14/2001	93,525			96,151			2,626
9/15/2001	95,422			98,994			3,572
9/16/2001	96,881			98,783			1,902
9/17/2001	92,584			95,365			2,781
						TOTAL	          17,249		
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dornan, Dari  
Sent:	Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:35 PM
To:	Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Blair, Lynn; Cessac, Kenneth; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley
Subject:	Northern vs. Oneok:  Oneok measurement settlement

Attached please find a draft settlement agreement for the September 12 - 17 dispute.  Please let me have your comments ASAP.  We need to fax this on Friday.  Dari

 << File: Oneok Settlement re incident of September 12 - 17.doc >>