-----Original Message-----
From: 	Cattigan, Ed  
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:53 AM
To:	Astramowicz, Jarek; Overfield, Adam; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9

`	Jarek

	Are you sure this is right as I know that JD went ot Vattenfal on a higher package than this.

	Ed

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Astramowicz, Jarek  
Sent:	15 November 2001 16:47
To:	Overfield, Adam; Cattigan, Ed; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9

The package is significantly higher than what the industry peers would receive in this position and in this market. I wish we had a chance to discuss this issue internally first.

In case I were to retain him as part of Enron Poland at a later date - I can not justify this level of remuneration as part of my budget.

Jarek

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Overfield, Adam  
Sent:	15 November 2001 17:41
To:	Astramowicz, Jarek; Cattigan, Ed; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9

Jarek

I have discussed this with Jacek.  The reason for increasing Jacek's package is retention.

Adam

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Astramowicz, Jarek  
Sent:	15 November 2001 16:24
To:	Cattigan, Ed; Overfield, Adam; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	RE: Resolution No 9

Has this package been discussed with Jacek yet at all ?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cattigan, Ed  
Sent:	15 November 2001 16:56
To:	Overfield, Adam; Astramowicz, Jarek; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	Resolution No 9

Hi

Attached is resolution 9 filled in with Jacek's remuneration for you perusal prior to the Board meeting.

regards

Ed

 << File: RESOLUTION NO 9.doc >>