Mark, please forward this to the appropriate attorney and ask him or her to review this and advise me re the request below. Thank you. Jim
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maziarz, Renata  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:56 AM
To:	Overfield, Adam; Cattigan, Ed; Astramowicz, Jarek; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley, Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Cc:	Glowacki, Jacek; Lojko, George; Zarebski, Aleksander
Subject:	Supervisory Board Meeting on 2001-11-20-rev.1
Importance:	High

Dear All,

Attached please find the Minutes of Meeting of Supervisory Board dated 20 November 2001- revision 1. The Minutes were changed per Mr Jarek Astramowicz's request with the respect to the following:
1. the text of the minutes, the agenda was added , and comment that the Budget for 2002 will be approve at the next SB meeting.
2. the resolution concerning approval of the Budget for 2002 was removed (as not approved yet).
3. resolutions concerning the remuneration of Mr. Glowacki and Mr. Zarebski - vote description corrected.
4. the total number of resolutions changed from 10 to 9, after removing a resolution concerning the Budget approval.

 

You are kindly requested to sign the resolutions and send them back to ENS. 

kind regards,
Renata Maziarz

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

---------------------- Forwarded by Renata Maziarz/EU/Enron on 27/11/2001 09:43 ---------------------------
From:	Jarek Astramowicz/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 26/11/2001 10:19 GMT
To:	Renata Maziarz/EU/Enron@ENRON, Adam Overfield/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Ed Cattigan/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Anne Edgley/Enron@EUEnronXGate, James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate, Krzysztof Forycki/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Lloyd Wantschek/ENRON@EUEnronXGate
cc:	Jacek Glowacki/EU/Enron@ENRON, Iwona Sierzega/EU/Enron@ENRON, George Lojko/EU/Enron@ENRON 

Subject:	RE: Supervisory Board Meeting on 2001-11-20

I believe that the Resolutions No. 4, 6 and 9 are not correct in terms of the text:

1. resolution no. 4 is not correct since the S.Board did not review the new (attached) changes to the budget and did not approve it. There was also an amandement to the text of the Resolution re. the line items and the total amounts exeeding the approved budget.	

I believe that the draft Budget with the new amendemends must be reviewed once again as a whole at the next Sup.Board meeting before it can be enacted.

2. Resoltuions No. 6 and 9 - the vote descritpion is not correct

Regards - Jarek

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maziarz, Renata  
Sent:	23 November 2001 08:14
To:	Overfield, Adam; Cattigan, Ed; Edgley, Anne; Derrick Jr., James; Astramowicz, Jarek; Forycki, Krzysztof; Wantschek, Lloyd
Cc:	Glowacki, Jacek; Sierzega, Iwona; Lojko, George
Subject:	Supervisory Board Meeting on 2001-11-20
Importance:	High

Dear All,
Attached please find the following documents for the Supervisory Board Meeting dated 20 November 2001 for you final approval and signatures.

kind regards,
Renata Maziarz
1.  << File: 01-11-20 Minutes of the SB meeting.doc >> 
2.  << File: Att No 1-O&M Budget for 2001-rev1.xls >> 
3.  << File: Att No 1-O&M Budget for 2001-rev1.xls >> 



4.  << File: BUDGET2002 revision 1.xls >> Budget-rev 1 is the Attachment No 3.