how about 4:00 p.m. conference call?

-----Original Message-----
From: Rebecca Schlanert [mailto:RSchlanert@electric.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:33 PM
To: 'jsmollon@newwestenergy.com'; arem@electric.com
Cc: douglass@energyattorney.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
Subject: RE: Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation
o f Su spension DA


I would be open to this as well.

Rebecca

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	jsmollon@newwestenergy.com [SMTP:jsmollon@newwestenergy.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:21 AM
> To:	arem@electric.com
> Cc:	douglass@energyattorney.com; Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
> Subject:	Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation
> of Su spension DA
> 
> I have had an opportunity to talk to most of you regarding the attached 
> proposal.  I apologize I ran out of time yesterday and didn't catch
> everyone.
> 
> NWE would like to propose a slightly different take on our AREM filing
> having had a chance to think more about it.  I wanted to run it by
> everyone
> to get your thoughts before submitting a redline.  If you feel this
> warrants
> a conference call I will gladly set one up for today.  Time is of the
> essence and would appreciate your feedback as soon as possible.  If we all
> agree, I would like to get the re-write with everyone's blessing to Dan by
> tomorrow at 8:00 am. or sooner.  
>  <<arm-puc-plan.doc>> 
> Proposal Benefits
> 
> 	1.	We look more reasonable and agree to much of what UDCs are
> proposing.
> 	2.	Accommodates most, if not all, of ESP and customer concerns.
> 	3.	Strong argument for avoiding any contract review.    Our
> verification proposal could backfire; PUC could accept our approach, but
> add
> details which goes toward ESPs submitting contracts to the PUC for review
> and validation 
> Thank you, 
> Janie Mollon
> Manager, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs
> Office:  602-629-7758
> FAX: 602-629-7772
> Mobile:  602-625-3892 
>  << File: arm-puc-plan.doc >>