Troy,
 It does not sound like they were interested enough to even discuss the 
proposed changes.  I would have probably given them something very close to 
their paragraph 5 if we had ever gotten over the other items.  Some things 
don't happen.  



	Troy Black/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/22/2001 10:50 AM
		 
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Craig Breslau/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: FW: Silgan Containers - NDA

FYI,

It is unfortunate that we lose business due to a simple confidentiality 
agreement.  Dan, I do appreciate your efforts with this matter.

Troy

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Michael Vogt" <MVogt@silganmfg.com>@ENRON 
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Michael+20Vogt+22+20+3CMVogt+40silganmfg+2Ecom+3E+40ENRO
N@ENRON.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 10:02 AM
To: Black, Troy
Subject: Silgan Containers - NDA

Troy -

I appreciate the time you took to have Enron's legal department review the 
non-disclosure agreement.  Unfortunately, Silgan cannot accept the requested 
changes, and specifically the deletion of paragraph 5.  As a result we have 
decided not to pursue a business relationship with Enron.

Thanks again for your time.

Michael Vogt


____________________________________
Michael C. Vogt
Manager, Supply Chain Analysis
Silgan Containers Corporation
Finding Solutions.  Creating Value.

e-mail: mvogt@silganmfg.com
www: http://www.silgancontainers.com

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the personal 
and confidential use of the designated recipient(s).  If the reader of this 
message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible for 
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you 
have received this e-mail in error, and that any review, dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication in error, please notify us 
immediately by e-mail.

Unsolicited advertising sent to this e-mail address is expressly prohibited 
under USC Title 47, Section 227.  Violators are subject to a charge of up to 
$1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.