Sorry for the delayed response, however, I was not in the office last week.

Originally, on moving Azurix back into Enron CRM, it was decided to leave Azurix on a separate insurance program to retain flexibility for potential sale activity.  (We did combine them into the Enron Directors and Officers Liability program as Azurix could no longer carry their own coverage, following the ownership change.)

We have not considered the options in the event of a sale, should Wessex and a select few assets not be included.  I understand that the current liability limit maintained by Azurix is $600,000,000.  The Enron limit is more than that.  As an Enron subsidiary, low liability limits are not acceptable and in those cases where "separate" programs are purchased,  the excess amount above the separate program is maintained here.  I am traveling tomorrow and will return to the office Wednesday before noon.  We need to meet and discuss.  I will phone you on Wednesday.  

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod  
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 10:25 AM
To:	Bouillion, James L.
Cc:	'Mark Watts <mark.watts@wessexwater.co.uk>@ENRON'; John Garrison (E-mail)
Subject:	RE: Azurix Global Insurance Programme

Jim:    What do you think?   I would like to get you involved in this discussion to help us sort out the costs and pros/cons.
John:   I think we can get Jim Bouillion working with Mark to get this moving in the right direction. 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mark Watts <mark.watts@wessexwater.co.uk>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Mark+20Watts+20+3Cmark+2Ewatts+40wessexwater+2Eco+2Euk+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 9:58 AM
To:	John Garrison (E-mail)
Cc:	Rod Hayslett (E-mail)
Subject:	Azurix Global Insurance Programme

John,

Wessex has to start work around now on next year's budget - one of the first
tasks for me to do is to come up with next years insurance costs.

I am proposing to cost this on the basis of reverting back to a standalone
insurance programme for Wessex as opposed to being part of the Azurix Global
Insurance Programme.  The main reasons for this are:

Following the hefty premium rise in 2001 the global programme is now on a
par with a standalone programme with regard premiums but more expensive
overall due to the much higher excess levels at Azurix.

Due to the above it could easily be argued that the global programme is not
offering best value for Wessex acting as a standalone company which of
course it must do under its licence - this causes potential 'RAG 5' problems
with the regulator.

The levels of coverage previously enjoyed by Wessex prior to the global
programme had been more than adequate for approximately 10 years.

If AZX assets are sold this year there may be no need for an Azurix
programme but to consider absorbing Wessex into any Enron programme will
probably only add to the problems above given that Wessex and Enron are such
diverse entities in terms of size, activities, locations and therefore
insurable risk.

Please could you confirm what I am proposing is OK with Enron.

Regards.

Mark Watts

Treasurer


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the Wessex Water IT Support Centre on:

44-1225-528888 or email support@wessexwater.co.uk

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************