----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 06/04/2001 09:26 AM -----

	Dan J Hyvl
	06/04/2001 09:14 AM
		
		 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: ENA deals moved from Ks assigned to AEP (deals belong to ENA)

Stacy,
 Please let them know that they are using the wrong assignment list.  Remind 
them that the list was changing as late as noon Friday.  They need to check 
the final list.  They can get that from George Weismann.



	Stacy E Dickson
	06/04/2001 09:04 AM
		 
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: ENA deals moved from Ks assigned to AEP (deals belong to ENA)

Does this make sense to you?
----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 06/04/2001 09:03 AM -----

	Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
	06/01/2001 09:51 AM
		 
		 To: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey 
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ENA deals moved from Ks assigned to AEP (deals belong to ENA)



Please reconfirm as necessary. These were all riding on contracts that have 
been "assigned" to AEP/HPL/Lodisco effective 6/1/01. ENA is no longer party 
to the original agreements. Please note that several of these are EOL 
transactions.

Thank you!
Cyndie

PS, Accounting was not copied on this message as there is no accounting 
impact on the contract # changes (all deals moved have production beginning 
6/1/01 (no additional production was finalized or cleared on these 
transactions under the prior agreement).