-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Dillon [mailto:kdillon@admin4.hsc.uth.tmc.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:50 AM
To: LHammer@BR-Inc.com; kristinwebb@earthlik.net; Lichtenwalter, Blair; Phee@hal-pc.org; Cary M. Jones; Morris A Flaum; Irsan Tisnabudi; J. Redford; Steve Ball; Paul Cooper; Irina Belmont; cathyawagner@aol.com; Victoria S Briscoe; 'Jerry Fuller'; Edward R Fullerton; Juanita E Poole; Rives Taylor; Brian Yeoman; Rick Miller; Scott Merville; myth@compassnet.com; Wesley Harrott; Maria E Hillman; Devin Longuet; Angela Hintzel; Loren Skinner; john@insync.net; loulwi@aol.com; Evans Attwell; pattesrm@bp.com; dredford@dogpc.com; wfisherman1@earthlink.net; Eileen Smith; Hammer; Donna Ervin; Donald R Woods; Donna Ervin; ccssandy@flash.net; Brad Stuebing; George.Bandy@us.interfaceinc.com; cary@dupuyoxygen.com; dmlink1936@yahoo.com; BhamrahT@USA.REDCROSS.ORG; dhick2@msn.com; tlyates@mail.ev1.net; karlas@fsddatasvc.com; CeciNavarre@aol.com; welch.cdc@ev1.net; jrennie@io.com; wardjb1@bp.com; Russ Causey; kajanj@tirr.tmc.edu; steve@pro-finance.com; curryijc@BP.com; greggme@yahoo.com; csaxenian@mail.waco.isd.tenet.edu; josephpwolfe@usa.net; wayman@lycosmail.com; Pam Stewart; jodorroh@usa.net; cseger@houston.rr.com; curryjk@mindspring.com; jgray@mcjunkin.com; Kirk.G.Usnick@usa.conoco.com; law@fcl.jsc.nasa.gov; katherine_easterling@hotmail.com; dxanadu@yahoo.com; jkoskoski@mindspring.com; bts@pdq.net; altoids@pdq.net; rony@austin.rr.com; EAGLEFORD@aol.com; John Koskoski; Scott Baxter; law@ial7.jsc.nasa.gov; blichte@enron.com; d.lineman@pentasafe.com; jg73@daimlerchrysler.com; Agnes Chan; Jerry Ellis; Charlie Hagedorn; Tad Mulder; Alan Parker; Alan Austin; T Lad & Kristin Webb; Adele T. Dillon 2; Tom Dillon; the links; David Link; Brother; Jane Brust-Glaeser
Cc: SulynDillon@msn.com
Subject: Quote for the day, #1,203.


"If nothing else, John Walker has usefully nailed one of the self-serving myths peddled after the awesome intelligence failure of September 11th: Awfully sorry we failed to see it coming, said the high-ranking suits, but it's impossible to do any covert deep-cover stuff out in Afghanistan; these fellows are all cousins and brothers-in-law -- a guy from Jersey would stick out like a lap-dancer in a burqa. As we now know, instead of being full of fearsome Pashtun warriors renowned down the centuries, the Omar/Osama ranks were like a novelty Gap ad, 'Losers of Many Nations' -- misfit Saudis and Pakis, Brits and Californians. Anyone can walk in off the street and be assistant supervisor of the third-floor latrine in Tora Bora by nightfall. The only distinguishing feature about John Walker is that he's such an obvious compendium of clapped-out clich?s from America's Left Coast the wonder is the mullahs didn't automatically take him for a CIA plant.
 
But no, Mr. Walker is for real -- born John Lindh in 1981, and from that bastion of well-heeled  dopehead progressivism, California's affluent Marin County. Following the traditional Marin pattern, his parents divorced, his mother converted to Buddhism and the children were taught Native American spirituality. John was sent to an 'alternative' high school. (In the Bay Area, all the high schools are 'alternative.' The problem for parents is trying to find any alternative to the alternative.) The set texts included The Autobiography Of Malcolm X, and John liked it so much that like the late Mr. X he too decided to embrace Islam and change his name, to Sulayman. His parents, putting their foot down for what seems to be the first and last time, demanded the right to continue calling him John. They had, after all, gone to the trouble of naming him after one of the colossi of the age, John Lennon. To this, he
 consented. In return, they let him study at the Mill Valley Islamic Center.
 
In 1998, after an awkward trip to their ancestral Ireland in which John trudged dutifully round the auld sod wearing his turban and white robes, Frank Lindh agreed to let his 17-year old son spend a year in Yemen, on the next stage of his 'spiritual odyssey.' He was just another middle-class kid who'd gone off to find himself, but, like most of the others, he always knew how to find daddy when he needed to. Last year, John e-mailed home to say al-Qaeda's attack on the USS Cole was justified -- oh, and by the way he was off to enroll in a Pakistani madrassa. So Dad wired him a couple thousand bucks, which goes a long way in Bannu. Aside from a glowing school report from his Imam, that was the last Mr. Lindh heard from Junior until he turned up brandishing an AK-47 while battling U.S. armed forces and declaring his approval of the events of September 11th.
 
John Walker's CV bears eloquent testament to his parents' scrupulous observance of the Bay Area's First Commandment: 'Thou shalt be non-judgmental.' Yeah, man, Yemen. Cool. Whatever's your bag. As one headline put it: 'A Product Of Bay Area Culture.' Exactly, I thought. But, this being The San Francisco Chronicle, they were applying the label with pride. Rhapsodizing about the area's 'religious tolerance' and the way children are taught 'to accept other cultures' and value 'critical thinking about the U.S. role in the world,' senior writer Louis Freedberg concluded that Walker's only misfortune was that 'his search for identity intersected precisely with the World Trade Center attacks.' If not for this unfortunate 'intersection' Walker might have become an 'idealistic doctor.' The President, he said, should allow the boy home 'and let him get his life back on track. We'd want nothing less for our own children, who could easily have found themselves in a similar mess.'
 
In fairness to the youth of northern California, that last part is an unjust slur. The marvel is that, after labouring under the twin burdens of the education system's multicultural orthodoxies and the preening moral superiority of their Boomer parents, no more Bay Area teens have signed on with Mullah Omar. Nonetheless, there is a difference between 'tolerance' of other cultures and the moral inertia displayed  by the Lindhs. We can, in any case, guess the limits of Marin County's much-vaunted 'tolerance.' Imagine that the Marinated Muslim had instead announced that he was going to do what the late (CIA agent) Mike Spann did at his age: enlist in the Marines. Would Marilyn Walker have seen that as a valid part of her son's 'self-discovery'? Or would she have got out her joss sticks and wailed, 'Oh, my God, where did we go wrong?'
 
Mom says she's 'proud' of John, but is taking the line he must have been 'brainwashed.' From the look of him, his brain's the only thing that's been washed. John Walker resembles one of those hairy, smelly, cadaverous, vaguely deranged guys who stumble up to you late at night at remote Greyhound stations and demand money for medication. But right now that's shrewd image-positioning. President Bush seems to have bought the 'misguided' line, describing Walker as a 'poor fellow' who thought he was fighting for a 'great cause.' 'I can't see him as being unpatriotic,' says a neighbour. 'This is where his journey led him.' And, anyway, as everyone says, he's just a 'boy.'
 
John Walker is a 20-year old man -- though one can sympathize if protracted exposure to the Bay Area's 'critical thinking' (if only) has left him in a state of arrested development. For four decades, supposedly 'non-judgmental' flower-children like Marilyn Walker have reflexively characterized CIA men like Mike Spann as the dark agents of right-wing militarism. We are entitled to judge Marilyn's son, the comrade of Spann's killers, as the dark agent of left-wing Marinism. Raised by peaceniks and Marinated in 'tolerance,' he took up an AK-47 in defence of misogynists and gay-bashers: not an internal contradiction, but the logical reductio of the new left's moral nullity. Cocooned in one of the most prosperous enclaves on the planet, he was taught everything -- from Buddhism to Indian spirituality to Malcolm X -- everything except what it means to be an American citizen.
 
When a 13-year-old girl wants an abortion, the Marin County crowd insists that 'a woman's right to choose is sacred (and even parental notification taboo). Twenty-year-old men make choices, too. John Walker chose to go to war against his own country. Americans should respect his 'right to choose' and let him live with the consequences.
 
I'm not in favour of trying him for treason: Alan Dershowitz and the other high-rent lawyers are already salivating over the possibility of a two-year circus with attendant book deals and TV movies. But there is another way, suggested the other day by the Sun's Peter Worthington. In 1944, lacking the benefits of an immersion in Bay Area 'critical thinking,' the teenage Worthington volunteered for the Royal Canadian Navy, but, unlike Walker's apologists, he at least treats him as an adult exercising free will. As Mr. Worthington notes, on page four of John Walker's U.S. passport it states that any American who enlists in a foreign army can be stripped of his citizenship. Mr. Walker wants to be Abdul Hamid: Mr. Bush should honour his wishes. Let us leave him to the Northern Alliance and let his fancy-pants 'Frisco lawyers petition to appear before the Kabul bar, if there is one. It would, surely, be grossly discriminatory to subject Mr. Hamid to non-Islamic justice."
 
Mark Steyn, British-born journalist, "'Misguided boy' deserves Afghan justice," The (Canadian) National Post, 12/10/01.