We talked about this in detail with Steve when he was in Houston. Please 
check with him.  The idea is that there would be the flexibility necessary to 
do just about anything.  Also, there are problems with the decision that 
Steve was going to talk with Pulsifer about.  Need to get status of those 
conversations.My understanding was that, if there's a problem with the 
decision, perhaps our filing would be pushed a bit past the Tuesday.  We'll 
need to find that out, too.




Jeremy Meier <jermeier@earthlink.net> on 08/30/2000 11:27:10 AM
To: jdasovic@enron.com
cc:  
Subject: Re: Interconnection agreements


J:

Are there additional service offerings (DWDM, etc.) that Enron wants to
offer in California (Steve indicated you guys talked about that) - and if
so, is there a narrative or did Steve get any specific info - for filing
with CPUC per final Decision?

We have to file updated tariffs next Tuesday - and want to include the
latest company service offerings.

J

jdasovic@enron.com wrote:

> Hi.  Thanks for all the help.  Life's nuts.  I'll try to give you a call
> later in the day and catch up.
>
> Jeremy Meier <jermeier@earthlink.net> on 08/25/2000 05:56:29 PM
>
> To:   jdasovic@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Interconnection agreements
>
> Jeff:
>
> Welcome back.  We did send the Analysis Memo last week to all, with some
> small difficulty discerning correct email addresses for the various
> folks.  Please let us know if anyone did not get their copy.
>
> You have several electronic version of interconnection agreements for
> California, and we can discuss at your convenience.  The process for
> adopting an agreement "as is" is fairly straightforward in Calif and
> will not take that long (a few weeks).
>
> We are also filing updated pages for tariffs, including substantive
> service changes which Steve mentioned.  We can show you any documents
> before filing (9/5/00 is the last day).
>
> Please feel free to let us know any questions,
>
> Jeremy Meier
> Blumenfeld & Cohen