mike t will get it out.  
sox is almost done and the nox we've been speaking of is close as well.  we've got more time to sell the voc than the others.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	David Oppenheimer <doppenheimer@natsource.com>@ENRON  
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 1:07 PM
To:	Woods, Trevor
Subject:	RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA

sox is almost final on you selling away?

which Nox?

and what's the time on the VOC?  certificates would help.  fax 212.232.5353.



-----Original Message-----
From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 2:09 PM
To: doppenheimer@natsource.com; Michael.E.Taylor@enron.com
Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA


got me on it's uses.  want me to fax you the certs?  the sox is almost
final on the sale and the nox is close.  i think there is a little more
time for the voc.
tell mike t your fax if you want a copy of the certs.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   David Oppenheimer <doppenheimer@natsource.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 1:03 PM
   To:     Woods, Trevor
   Subject:  RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA

   VOC ( which is call POC out there--precursor organic compunds).
   SOx--yes,
   if it can be used for PM.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com]
   Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 2:06 PM
   To: doppenheimer@natsource.com
   Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA



   are you looking for VOC and SOx in the bay area?

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   David Oppenheimer <doppenheimer@natsource.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 11:33 AM
      To:     Woods, Trevor
      Subject:  RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA

      there's that: it's VOC and not NOx.  having a hard time with the
      columns. .
      . .

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com]
      Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 12:36 PM
      To: doppenheimer@natsource.com
      Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA


      there is that?

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   David Oppenheimer <doppenheimer@natsource.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 11:30 AM
         To:     Woods, Trevor
         Subject:  RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA

         oh, right, VOC, there is that.

         -d

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com]
         Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 12:06 PM
         To: doppenheimer@natsource.com
         Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA


         that's voc and we sold it.  the 179 is no longer ours, according
   to
      the
         tnrcc and our records.

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   David Oppenheimer <doppenheimer@natsource.com>@ENRON
            Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 10:45 AM
            To:     Woods, Trevor
            Subject:  RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA

            also cert. 1494 for 5.94 tpy that you picked up from
   Rhodia.....?

            -----Original Message-----
            From: David Oppenheimer
            Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:35 AM
            To: 'Trevor.Woods@enron.com'
            Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA


            ok, it's a 98.2 tpy balance.  and as far as I can tell, it's in
            certificate
            number 1427.  What was the last deal you did for those--81 tpy
   to
      Air
            Liquide on 11/14/00?  Reducing the ~179 to 98.

            keep me posted.

            --D.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com]
            Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:02 PM
            To: doppenheimer@natsource.com
            Subject: RE: 179 ERC balance in HGA


            according to our records and the tnrcc we don't have any.  if
   you
         know
            better and can find the cert numbers we'll sell them.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   David Oppenheimer <doppenheimer@natsource.com>@ENRON
               Sent:   Friday, November 02, 2001 12:56 PM
               To:     Woods, Trevor
               Subject:  179 ERC balance in HGA

               any progress on those leftover NOx offsets in Houston?

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com]
               Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:28 PM
               To: doppenheimer@natsource.com
               Subject: RE: how about PM in the Bay?


               any word on the nox in san joaquin?

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   David Oppenheimer <doppenheimer@natsource.com>
   @ENRON
                  Sent:   Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:27 PM
                  To:     Woods, Trevor
                  Subject:  RE: how about PM in the Bay?

                  supposed to be major, all good, etc.  no limits i know.
      will
            accept
               a
                  due
                  diligence period after close

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Trevor.Woods@enron.com
   [mailto:Trevor.Woods@enron.com]
                  Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:28 PM
                  To: doppenheimer@natsource.com
                  Subject: RE: how about PM in the Bay?


                  what's the source of the ys credits?  can it be used for
   a
         major
               source,
                  any limitations, etc?

                      -----Original Message-----
                     From:   David Oppenheimer <doppenheimer@natsource.com>
      @ENRON
                     Sent:   Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:30 PM
                     To:     Woods, Trevor
                     Subject:  how about PM in the Bay?

                     seller of a couple hundred.  closing some pieces
   around
      50K.
               sounds
                     like he
                     would hit the next bid a fair bit below.








   **********************************************************************
                  This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
      relevant
               affiliate
                  and
                  may contain confidential and privileged material for the
      sole
         use
            of
               the
                  intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
            disclosure
               by
                  others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
   intended
            recipient
               (or
                  authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
   the
            sender
               or
                  reply
                  to Enron Corp. at
   enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
      and
            delete
                  all
                  copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
      hereto)
            are
               not
                  intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
   create
      or
               evidence
                  a
                  binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or
   any
      of
            its
                  affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
   party,
      and
         may
               not
                  be
                  relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
   estoppel
      or
               otherwise.
                  Thank you.





   **********************************************************************