Please work with Energy Operations to determine where it went and if we sole it or if is still on the pipe.  The priority should be based on your judgment.
Ed

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris  
Sent:	Monday, March 11, 2002 4:38 PM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed
Cc:	Mann, Kay; McMichael Jr., Ed; Dicarlo, Louis; Dhont, Margaret; Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric; Parks, Joe; Melanie Gray (E-mail)
Subject:	RE: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post petition Deliveries

Ed, this gas was nominated on an IT contract into a pool on NGPL.  I am unable to identify the gas after that so its difficult for me to tell if the estate benefited.  Let me know what you want to do at this point.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	melanie.gray@weil.com@ENRON  
Sent:	Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:30 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	Mann, Kay; McMichael Jr., Ed; Dicarlo, Louis; Dhont, Margaret; Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric; Parks, Joe
Subject:	RE: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post petition Deliveries


Assuming all of what is below is all correct, it appears that TDC is
entitled to payment.  The question with administrative priority is whether
the the estate benefitted.  If we took the gas, I assume that we did.
THanks.




"Germany, Chris" <Chris.Germany@ENRON.com> on 03/06/2002 02:38:33 PM
cc:    "Dicarlo, Louis" <Louis.Dicarlo@ENRON.com>, "Dhont, Margaret"
       <Margaret.Dhont@ENRON.com>, "Polsky, Phil"
       <Philip.Polsky@ENRON.com>, "Boyt, Eric" <Eric.Boyt@ENRON.com>,
       "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>, Melanie Gray/HO/WGM/US@WGM
Subject:    RE: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post petition Deliveries


3/6/02 2:30 PM just spoke with Louis Schott (504-529-3630  Sr. Vice
President & General Counsel for TDC) - TDC has not filed a claim with the
courts at this time.  TDC is trying to avoid the administrative expense and
expects to be paid $203,196.00.  I told him I would call him back Friday
afternoon and give him a status update.  Please let me know what I can tell
him.  This was an ENA deal.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:     Mann, Kay
> Sent:     Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:02 PM
> To: Germany, Chris; McMichael Jr., Ed
> Cc: Dicarlo, Louis; Dhont, Margaret; Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric; Parks,
Joe; 'melanie.gray@weil.com'
> Subject:  RE: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post petition Deliveries
>
> If is was an ENA deal, the Dec. 3 is correct post-petition date.
>
> I don't have anything on my list from TDC.  Won't hurt to call them
anyway.
>
> Kay
>
>      -----Original Message-----
>     From:       Germany, Chris
>     Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:13 AM
>     To:   McMichael Jr., Ed; Mann, Kay
>     Cc:   Dicarlo, Louis; Dhont, Margaret; Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric;
Parks, Joe
>     Subject:    FW: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post petition Deliveries
>
>     Summary:  TDC Energy Corporation is requesting payment of $203,196.00
from ENA for post-petition gas that flowed in the month of December 2001
(sitara deal #1143983).  TDC stated that it would "file a claim for
administrative expenses in the bankruptcy court in New York and seek all
other necessary relief against ENA" if ENA did not remit payment by the
close of business Feb 22, 2002.  Based on the information in this email it
appears that ENA should pay TDC $203,196.00.
>
>     Kay, Ed, Question:  I have not contacted TDC to determine if they
have filed a claim with the court.  Would that have any impact on making a
payment to TDC?  Should I contact TDC?
>
>
>     Calculation of Post-Petition Payment using Dec 3 as Post-Petition day
>     Gas scheduled Dec 3-24, 26-31 = 28 days, volume = 3,000 dth per day
>     28 x 3,000 x $2.419 = $203,196.00
>
>
>      -----Original Message-----
>     From:       Olinger, Kimberly S.
>     Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 4:35 PM
>     To:   Germany, Chris
>     Subject:    RE: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post petition Deliveries
>
>     we took 3000 a day everyday except the 25th
>
>            -----Original Message-----
>           From:       Germany, Chris
>           Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 4:26 PM
>           To:   Olinger, Kimberly S.
>           Subject:    FW: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post petition
Deliveries
>
>           I need your expertise.  If ENA nominated this gas, and I think
we did based on what I see in Unify, then we are supposed to pay for it.
So I just need to verify with you  we TOOK this gas by nominating it.
>
>           Deal 1143983 on Natural Gas Pipeline Company.
>
>           thanks
>
>            -----Original Message-----
>           From:       Ellenberger, Mary
>           Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:01 PM
>           To:   Germany, Chris
>           Subject:    RE: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post petition
Deliveries
>
>
>                 Sitara# 1143983
>
>                  -----Original Message-----
>                 From:       Germany, Chris
>                 Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:21 PM
>                 To:   Ellenberger, Mary
>                 Subject:    FW: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post
petition Deliveries
>
>                 Do you have a deal number for this gas?
>
>                  -----Original Message-----
>                 From:       Dicarlo, Louis
>                 Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:30 AM
>                 To:   Germany, Chris
>                 Subject:    FW: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post
petition Deliveries
>
>
>
>                  -----Original Message-----
>                 From:       Dicarlo, Louis
>                 Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:30 AM
>                 To:   Mann, Kay
>                 Subject:    RE: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post
petition Deliveries
>
>                 I contacted Mary Ellenberger.  She indicated we did
receive the gas but have not paid.  I suggested that she contact you via
email.
>
>                        -----Original Message-----
>                       From:       Mann, Kay
>                       Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:50 AM
>                       To:   Dicarlo, Louis>
>                       Cc:   McMichael Jr., Ed; Boyt, Eric
>                       Subject:    RE: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post
petition Deliveries
>
>
>                       Have we determined if the facts in the letter are
correct?  I've confirmed that if the facts are true, the payment needs to
be made.
>
>                       Kay
>                        -----Original Message-----
>                       From:       Mann, Kay
>                       Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 5:19 PM
>                       To:   Dicarlo, Louis
>                       Cc:   McMichael Jr., Ed; Boyt, Eric
>                       Subject:    RE: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post
petition Deliveries
>
>                       All I need to know is if ENA received the gas as
stated, and if there are any extenuating circumstances which would keep us
from paying.  Otherwise I believe we need to make payments in accordance
with the terms of the deal.  I'll confirm.
>
>                       Kay
>
>                        -----Original Message-----
>                       From:       Dicarlo, Louis
>                       Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 5:14 PM
>                       To:   Panus, Stephanie; Mann, Kay
>                       Cc:   McMichael Jr., Ed; Boyt, Eric
>                       Subject:    FW: Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post
petition Deliveries
>
>                       Attached is a demand letter w/ short time fuse.
Counterparty wants payment for post-petition gas delivered to Enron.
Please advise if you need commercial involvement.  Thanks
>
>                        -----Original Message-----
>                       From:       Louis Schott <Louis@tdcenergy.com>
@ENRON
>                       Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 4:07 PM
>                       To:   Dicarlo, Louis
>                       Subject:    Letter re Unpaid Invoice for Post
petition Deliveries
>
>                        - February 19 2002letter to enron north
america.DOC << File: February 19 2002letter to enron north america.DOC >>


**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************








---------------------------------NOTE-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by email (postmaster@weil.com), and destroy the original message. Thank you

==============================================================================