Hi Marilyn - 

Thanks for the Vancouver notes.  Regarding the item on POR/PODs - since the
meeting, Mark sent out the Clarification letter of September 24 (attached)
stating we use the WSCC POR/POD acronyms until 1.7 hits the streets.  E-Tag
1.7 will use the POR/PODs that TPs have attempted to register
http://reg.tsin.com/ .  Although not part of the actual meeting, it might be
good to add a reference to the clarification letter so readers can get the
latest and greatest direction concerning POR/PODs usage.

 <<Clarification Letter>> 

Robert Harshbarger
Puget Sound Energy
OASIS Trading Manager
425.462.3348 (desk)
206.604.3251 (cell)


> ----------
> From: 	Franz, Marilyn[SMTP:MFranz@SPPC.com]
> Sent: 	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:42 PM
> To: 	Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS)
> Subject: 	RE: Scheduling Time constant
> 
> <<File: WSCC ISAS 0901 VancouverMinutes.doc>>
> SPPC Transmission would like to go forward with PPT as a common scheduling
> time for the same reasons the expressed by WMIC.
> 
> Also, attached are the minutes for the Vancouver meeting.
> 
> Thanks,
> Marilyn Franz
> Sierra Pacific Power Transmission
> 775-834-4322
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hackney, Mark W(Z39911) [mailto:Mark.Hackney@aps.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:01 AM
> To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS)
> Subject: Scheduling Time constant
> 
> 
> It's been brought to my attention that we never resolved the issue of the
> common scheduling time (no Freudian slip on the acronym).  The group
> agreed
> to a PST value in July, but we wanted to survey the OC and WMIC first
> before
> going further.  That was to be one of our topic in Vancouver.  Well....
> 
> So, I'd like to get a feel from the group: the survey leaned toward
> Pacific
> Prevailing Time as that match up with energy products, so.. continue to go
> forward with PST as in July, modify our suggestion to PPT or drop all
> together and wait to see if NERC is going to come up with something.  If
> we
> decide to go with either PST or PPT, I will get the OC Steering to help
> with
> clarification on this as a due process item or an item that can be brought
> to the OC for vote in 2002.  In addition, I would think that most would
> agree that implementation if it takes affect would be favorable at the
> April
> 2002 time change, so that is my suggestion that we use, if ISAS goes
> forward
> with the request to the OC.
> 
> Please get back with your thought by next Wednesday so I can put together
> something for the upcoming OC meetings.
> 
> Mark W. Hackney
> Section Leader
> Pre and Real-time Transmission Scheduling
> APS OATT Administration
> Arizona Public Service Company
> 602.250.1128 - Office
> 602.908.1423 - Cell
> 602.250.1155 - Fax
> mailto:Mark.Hackney@aps.com
> _________________________________________________________________
> Click to add my contact info to your organizer:
> http://my.infotriever.com/cc2tf0ey
> 
> 

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From: Hackney, Mark W(Z39911) <Mark.Hackney@aps.com>
To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS) <isas@wscc.com>
Date: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:17:54 PM
Subject: Clarification Letter

Please read attached letter:

 <<Clarifying Letter.doc>> 
Mark W. Hackney
Section Leader
Pre and Real-time Transmission Scheduling
APS OATT Administration
Arizona Public Service Company
602.250.1128 - Office
602.908.1423 - Cell
602.250.1155 - Fax
mailto:Mark.Hackney@aps.com
_________________________________________________________________
Click to add my contact info to your organizer:
http://my.infotriever.com/cc2tf0ey