I take your point, but to clarify my intent in gathering this information: I'm not making the case for a different "tilt" to our giving; I was looking for information about the total giving (including individuals) by companies which share a common viewpoint and may face some of the same risks that we face if the democrats continue their runaway campaign of corporation bashing.  Pharmaceuticals were included because Ken sits on Lilly's board and wanted a closer look at that sector.  Ken asked for the information because he is at least thinking about making an appeal to the business community to send some of the same strong messages we are beginning to send.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Linda  
Sent:	Tuesday, July 24, 2001 7:35 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	Re: FW: Research

I'm not sure of the context of your Email to Ken, but I wanted to emphasize one point on the data you've put together.   The Center for Responsible Politics' numbers include individual contributions.  Thus, if you look at Enron's so-called split, under their analysis Enron splits its $ much for favorably for Republicans than in the numbers underpinning the pie charts contained in the material I distributed.  Unlike the Center's numbers, my charts do not reflect giving by individuals working at Enron.  Most of our individual $, which is significant, is given to Republicans.  Consequently, as I understand the history of our giving, part of our thinking on splitting soft $ is to offset the overwhelming individual $ given to Republicans.   One last thought is that I understand the split recommended in our proposed budget  is much more Republican than it has been in past years.  Hope this helps.




	Steven J Kean/ENRON@enronXgate 07/24/2001 07:47 PM 	   To: Kenneth Lay/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: Richard Shapiro/ENRON@enronXgate, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON  Subject: FW: Research	


Further to our conversation of the other day, we have compiled some information on political contributions by other corporations.

Please see attached spreadsheet.  As you will note, energy companies are already heavily slanted to the Republican party (as are Pharmaceuticals for the most part).  The interesting one is the financial sector, where contributions are more evenly split with one (Bank of America) heavily slanted to the Democrats.  Have a look and let's talk.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	O'connell, Earlene  
Sent:	Monday, July 23, 2001 5:13 PM
To:	Linnell, Elizabeth
Cc:	Kean, Steven J.
Subject:	RE: Research
Importance:	High

Good afternoon-

I have pulled the information that you requested and the attached document outlines the findings.  Per your request, the data compiled is a sampling of soft money donations for the 1998-2002 cycle for the Energy, Financial, and Pharmaceutical industries.  This was ready for you last night, but I decided to dig a little deeper and have provided additional data that you may find useful.

I looked at the specific industry for the companies that you requested and then I backed up to the "Overview" for the industry.

In "The Center for Responsive Politics" website, the "Top Recipients" are based on contributions from PACs, soft money donors, and individuals giving $200 or more. Due to the voluminous nature of the Top Recipients listed, I printed them out and they are available for your perusal.  On the spreadsheet, I continued the analysis on the Top Recipients and what was donated, in the election cycles 1998 - 2000, across the 3 industries.   Because you asked for a combination of Oil & Gas Companies and Electric Utilities, I showed Electric Utilities and Oil & Gas data, separately and then combined.  

Numbers that are listed in "bold" indicate the group who had the largest donations within each research area.  The split on the "Top Presidential Democrat and Republican Candidates" are calculated from the "Overview of Sectors '98 - '00".

If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.


 << File: Soft Money Analysis 98_02.xls >> 
Thanks!

______________________________
Earlene O'Connell
Enron Corp.
Public Affairs
earlene.o'connell@enron.com
713-853-7870

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Linnell, Elizabeth  
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 10:05 AM
To:	O'connell, Earlene
Subject:	Research

Please pull information on the soft money federal contributions by the following organizations:

Duke
Dynegy
Mirant
Southern
Williams

Various financial institutions

Eli Lilly and other pharmaceuticals

We're interested in their overall spend, their party split, and the individual candidates they're contributing to.

Thanks.