I've got it booked. I'll give you a call.   Thanks, Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kirk Ketcherside [mailto:igi@nctimes.net]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 8:41 AM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: Re: FW: Interconnect Agreement


Kim-
Let's do it.
Do you want to give me a buzz at 760/918-0001 next Friday?
Thanks.
Kirk

"Watson, Kimberly" wrote:
> 
> Kirk,
> 
> How about talking at 10:30am CST on Friday, August 10?  My day is pretty
> flexible, so if another time works better for you, please let me know.
> 
> Thanks, Kim.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kirk Ketcherside [mailto:igi@nctimes.net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 4:26 PM
> To: Watson, Kimberly
> Subject: Re: FW: Interconnect Agreement
> 
> Kim-
> Thanks for your message.
> Let's look at Thurs or Friday of next week.
> Hearings went good...next meeting on 8/20.
> Should get vote following that meeting, then goes to ACC commissioners
> for final vote by 9/18/01.
> Stay tuned.
> Thanks
> Kirk
> 
> "Watson, Kimberly" wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kirk,
> >
> > I got your "out of the office" message the other day when I emailed
> you,
> > so I knew you would be busy when you got back in the office.  My
> > schedule is a little hectic tomorrow, my afternoon looks a little
> better
> > than the morning.  Next week looks wide open.  Would you mind waiting
> > until next week?  I just want to make sure we are not holding you up.
> > Let me know your preference.
> >
> > By the way, how did your testimony go on Big Sandy?
> >
> > Thanks, Kim.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kirk Ketcherside [mailto:igi@nctimes.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 2:38 PM
> > To: Watson, Kimberly
> > Subject: Re: FW: Interconnect Agreement
> >
> > Kim-
> > Thanks for your recent message.
> > I spent the last couple of days in Phoenix testifying on Big Sandy
> > project and just picked up your message.
> > I would look forward to visiting with you sometime Friday AM.
> > Let me know if this works, or perhaps next week some time.
> > I will be in Denver M-W, and then returning to my office on Th/F of
> next
> > week.
> > Kirk
> >
> > "Ketcherside, Kirk L (IGI Resources)" wrote:
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Watson, Kimberly [mailto:Kimberly.Watson@enron.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 11:07 AM
> > > To: KetcheKL@bp.com
> > > Subject: Interconnect Agreement
> > >
> > > Good Morning Kirk,
> > >
> > > I hope you had a nice weekend.  I have been working on the
> > Interconnect
> > > Agreement for the Big Sandy Project and I would like to schedule
> some
> > > time for a telephone conference with you as I have a few "blanks" in
> > the
> > > Interconnect Agreement that I would like to discuss with you so that
> > our
> > > draft is as complete as it can be.  Would you have some time on
> > Tuesday
> > > AM or Wednesday AM?  I would also be available on Thursday
> > 2:00-3:00pm.
> > > I'm thinking we need about a half an hour.
> > >
> > > Also, I can update you on the remaining capacity on our Red  Rock
> > > Expansion which could be used to serve the plant.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kim.
> > > 713-853-3098.
> > >
> > >
> **********************************************************************
> > > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> > affiliate and
> > > may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> > the
> > > intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
> by
> > > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> > (or
> > > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
> or
> > reply
> > > to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> delete
> > all
> > > copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
> > not
> > > intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> > evidence a
> > > binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> > > affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
> not
> > be
> > > relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> > otherwise.
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> **********************************************************************