Great reading.  Sue, I would like to see the Supreme Court brief.  I imagine Jim would, too.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan 
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:39 PM
To: Williams, Robert C.; Steffes, James D.; Smith, Mike; Wu, Andrew
Subject: AReM's 2nd draft of comments responding to Carl Wood
Importance: High


Gang,
 
Here is a current draft of AReM's comments due tomorrow.  Let me know if you have comments.  Enron will not be submitting comments separately.
 
Sue
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:37 PM
To: ARM; Gary Ackerman; Bob Anderson; Curt Hatton
Subject: SECOND DRAFT OF TOMORROW'S COMMENTS
Importance: High


Attached for your review and comment is a second draft of tomorrow's comments on the Wood ACR.  I have added a significantly expanded section dealing with how the Commission's inaction and subsequent action contributed to the flow of customers back and forth between DA and bundled service.  My thanks to Aaron Thomas for his assistance on this section.
 
Also, I have deleted the "CYA - not the California Youth Authority" quip --  I had to have some fun while writing this on Halloween night!

Dan
 
Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com <mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com>