Rick, Dari said she would make the letter 8,625.  Thanks. Lynn

-----Original Message-----
From: Dietz, Rick 
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:23 AM
To: Blair, Lynn
Subject: RE: Northern vs. Oneok: Oneok measurement settlement


I know this is trivial, but, I don't believe we can actually settle on a .5 MMBtu and enter a fractional volume into GVA or TAS.   I would suggest using 8,625.
-----Original Message----- 
From: Blair, Lynn 
Sent: Thu 12/27/2001 9:05 AM 
To: Dornan, Dari; Cessac, Kenneth; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley 
Cc: Blair, Lynn 
Subject: RE: Northern vs. Oneok: Oneok measurement settlement



        Dari, Harry and I have run through the numbers and how we will show the difference on the 
        books and agree with your number. Thanks. Lynn 

 -----Original Message----- 
From:   Dornan, Dari  
Sent:   Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:14 AM 
To:     Cessac, Kenneth; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Blair, Lynn; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley

Subject:        RE: Northern vs. Oneok:  Oneok measurement settlement 

So the settlement number will be 8,624.50 MMBtu. 

 -----Original Message----- 
From:   Cessac, Kenneth  
Sent:   Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:10 AM 
To:     Dornan, Dari; Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Blair, Lynn; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley

Subject:        RE: Northern vs. Oneok:  Oneok measurement settlement 

Dari, 

Listed below are the volumes from plant PTR and NNG calculated PTR based on inlet/outlet measurement for September 12 - 17.  The Plant PTR values were obtained from a letter from ONEOK  to Harry Woodson dated November 1, 2001.  This information may help in determining the settlement volume for this time period.


Date            Plant PTR               NNG PTR         Difference 
9/12/2001       88,335                  90,910                  2,575 
9/13/2001       92,175                  95,968                  3,793 
9/14/2001       93,525                  96,151                  2,626 
9/15/2001       95,422                  98,994                  3,572 
9/16/2001       96,881                  98,783                  1,902 
9/17/2001       92,584                  95,365                  2,781 
                                                TOTAL             17,249                

 -----Original Message----- 
From:   Dornan, Dari  
Sent:   Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:35 PM 
To:     Porter, J. Gregory; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Blair, Lynn; Cessac, Kenneth; Davis, Britt; Ringblom, Kathy; January, Steve; Woodson, Harry; Dietz, Rick; Graham, Charlie; Darveaux, Mary; Thompson, Charlie; Hawkins, Don; Anderson, Gary E.; Herber, Stephen; Corman, Shelley

Subject:        Northern vs. Oneok:  Oneok measurement settlement 

Attached please find a draft settlement agreement for the September 12 - 17 dispute.  Please let me have your comments ASAP.  We need to fax this on Friday.  Dari

 << File: Oneok Settlement re incident of September 12 - 17.doc >>