I think that we should be careful.  Private label activity can occur with a 
city today in California if the Muncipal government agrees.  I would not want 
to try and "thread the needle" on a very specific muni language right now in 
CA - too much activity.

Jim



From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/04/2001 04:36 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Robert Davis/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange@EES
cc: Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Richard 
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J 
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra 
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen 
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Re: California SB 23X   

Thanks for the note.  We'll need to to discuss this a bit further, since it 
could be a very sensitive issue for us (e.g., "Enron's answer to the 
electricity crisis in municipalization).  If spun right, could provide an 
interesting opportunity, however.

Best,
Jeff



	Robert Davis/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
	05/04/2001 04:08 PM
		 
		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Daniel 
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: California SB 23X 

Gentlemen, 

California State Senator Nell Soto (D-Ontario Dist.32) has authored SB 23 X 
which is intended to streamline the formation of public power districts in 
California.  

Here is an opportunity for Enron to get involved and flex some muscle and win 
on several fronts.  I think Enron is uniquely qualified to work with 
municipalities to provide private labeled products or services that will 
create a winning situation for all parties involved (including the IOUs).  

I am extremely interested in working on such an effort and would very much 
enjoy sharing my ideas in more detail at any time.  Please feel free to 
contact me.

Thanks all,

Robert Davis, Account Manager
Enron Energy Services
611 Anton Blvd. Suite 700
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Phones:
Office 714-434-1800 ext.455
Cell 714-267-0968
Pager 888-935-2143