Yes, unless the facts have changed.  Have the facts changed?

-----Original Message-----
From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:52 PM
To: Proctor, Shemin V.; Zisman, Stuart
Subject: RE: Duke Field Services


Shemin, you still stand by what you said below?

-----Original Message-----
From: Proctor, Shemin V. [mailto:sproctor@akllp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Parks, Joe
Cc: mark.ellenberg@cwt.com; melanie.gray@weil.com
Subject: Duke Field Services


Joe,

Based on our discussions, the facts are as follows: Prior to 12/2/01,
ENA sold gas to One Oak.  During the period 12/4-12/31/01, Duke Field
Services inadvertently flowed gas on the MRT pipeline to ENA. ENA used
the gas received from Duke Field Services to fulfill its obligations
under the sales agreement to One Oak.  

ENA is obligated to pay Duke Field Services for the gas it received and
later delivered to One Oak because this event occurred post-petition and
benefited ENA.

Shemin




**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. 
**********************************************************************