Falls woefully short of my expectations for this capacity, though it's [structured] along the lines we'll probably be seeking in competing proposals.  Let's talk.


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 01/26/2001 04:00 PM ---------------------------


"Johnston, Elsa" <EJohnsto@UtiliCorp.com> on 01/26/2001 01:37:49 PM
To:	"'sharris1@enron.com'" <sharris1@enron.com>, "'jeffery.fawcett@enron.com'" <jeffery.fawcett@enron.com>
cc:	"Mackenzie, Nanci" <NMackenz@UtiliCorp.com>, "Benton, Abby"	 <ABenton@UtiliCorp.com>, "Bishop, Cindy" <CBishop@UtiliCorp.com>, "Collins, Tracy" <tcollins@utilicorp.com>, "Hyne, Leslie"	 <LHyne@UtiliCorp.com>, "Johnston, Elsa" <EJohnsto@UtiliCorp.com>, "Powers, Chris" <CPowers@UtiliCorp.com>, "Sommerfelt, Rob"	 <RSommerf@UtiliCorp.com>, "Tuttle, Mary" <MTuttle@UtiliCorp.com> 

Subject:	Revised proposal for FT-East - 400,000


Attached is a revised proposal for the 400,000 FT-East transport.  Please
review and let me know your comments as soon as you can.
 <<term deal 400000 11_01 deal2.doc>>

 - term deal 400000 11_01 deal2.doc