Revised (continually being revised) customs risk assessment.  The note will 
help get a handle on the facts.  India is upping the quality/number of legal 
folks assigned to this (praise the Lord).  I will bet, however, that before 
we are through, we may be back to a higher number.  But let's hope not.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 
03/04/2001 10:35 PM ---------------------------


Jane Wilson
03/04/2001 05:24 PM
To: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Neil 
McGregor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mark Schroeder@ECT, Robert Mathis/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, 
skatwala@linklaters.com, Paul Kraske/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, 
Heidi Hellmann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mukesh 
Tyagi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, K 
Seethayya/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ashok 
Mehta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 

Subject: Note

Attached is a note on the facts of the Customs issues as I understand them as 
requested by Sandeep Katwala.  Also attached is a draft risk evaluation put 
together by Heidi Hellmann.  Please note that two issues are not yet 
evaluated and thus are not included in the risk evaluation: (i) loading a 
portion of the services agreement to the supply agreement that is 
attributable to power (at a 22.38% duty rate); and (ii) contractor delay 
claims.  
---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 
03/04/2001 05:17 PM ---------------------------


Jane Wilson
03/02/2001 08:13 PM
To: skatwala@linklaters.com
cc:  

Subject: Note

Here's the note:




Here's the risk evaluation.  Hit "view" to see it: