If we cut the people in red - HR would have you at 56 people - what is right?
 
AMy - please find the difference

-----Original Message-----
From: Rub, Jenny 
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Kitchen, Louise; Schoppe, Tammie
Cc: Webb, Jay
Subject: Data Request


Louise,  I worked with the team this morning and developed the following.  Please call me at 281-463-4421 or 713-851-5456 if you would like to discuss.   JR
 
Current Employee Count:   62 (includes 4 people in Calgary)
 
First Cut:   4 people 
Revised Employee Count:   58
 
Names/Impact
John Oh -- Fewer people to support in Portland, so less IT support staff needed
Greg Hibbert -- Fewer people to support in Calgary, so less IT support staff needed
Yvonne Francios -- Outsource video conferencing support (No cost reduction)
Randy Buckman -- No executive support;  executives will have receive trader level support
 
Second Cut:   4 people
Revised Employee Count:  54
 
Shari Daugherty -- Reduced service level in security adminitration and no backup 
Janet Devereaux -- Outsource phone switch support/backup to Avaya (cost increase)
Roberto DeLeon -- Rely on UBS for security investigations and policy
Faheem Qavi -- Rely on UBS for security investigations and policy
 
Third Cut:    5 people
Revised Employee Count:  49
 
Jenny Rub, Bob McAuliffe, Keith Dziadek, Chris Behney, Bruce Smith --  Reduced management structure, rely on UBS for software and vendor management.  Organizational management for the following functions would be moved to somewhere else in the IT organization:  command center, change managment, batch scheduling, server and storage, networking
 
Fourth Cut:   2 people
Revised Employee Count:  47
 
Gary Bode, Trey Rhodes  -- Rely on UBS' corporate email services;  no staff or operations available in Houston
 
Fifth Cut:     2 people
Revised Employee Count:   45
 
Troy Beyer, Ryan Brennan -- No source code management and batch scheduling software support;  Developers would become responsible for the management of these functions.