Below is a list of Sitara deals that had volume variances or where one side 
(purchase/sale) did not get accrued for the FEB 2000 accrual.     My goal 
here is to bring this to everyone attention and second to see if there is a 
solution.    I am taking a simplistic approach here in that since 
Intercompany Sitara deals are the same that the nominations on both sides 
should match on the month end accruals.    If I am wrong on this assumption 
or if there is a system limitation I am free to suggestions, ideas or 
resolutions.   Please feel free to give me a call. 

HPLC selling to ENA.   Production month FEB00(accrual):
Volume variance:
Sitara:  Meter/Point  Volume   Amount
156071  HPL/0980391  vol var of 24,167mmbtu  <$60,538.34>
  MIDT/0988743

Missing on Purchase side (ENA)
Sitara:  Meter/Point  Volume   Amount
160579  HPL/0986363  632,272mmbtu  $1,599,402.29
161541  HPL/0980694  108,576mmbtu  $278,296.18
166459  HGPL/8177-4570 30,000mmbtu  $75,000.00
201810  HPL/0986363  50,000mmbtu  $129,500.00
201839  HPL/0980694  20,000mmbtu  $51,800.00
202672  LONE/0361770  23,417mmbtu  $58,274.16
280083  HPL/0980308  555,292mmbtu  $1,518,225.09
  Total   1,395,689mmbtu $3,710,497.72
****************************************

MISSION:     Proactively Identify and resolve Intercompany volume issues 
upstream.

First Goal:  Tying Intercompany volumes on the monthly accruals.
Second Goal:  Tying Intercompany volumes on actuals.
Third Goal:  Minimizing analyse time saving $$$$.


Thanks
Gregg Lenart
Texas Gas Settlements
3-6921