As you can see,we are playing hardball with Oaktree. Any comments?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2000 12:17 PM -----

	SHoward@milbank.com
	05/16/2000 08:19 PM
		 
		 To: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com
		 cc: 
		 Subject: FW: Draft letter to Swartz




Richard: 

Please see the attached draft letter to Mike Swartz.? Give us your thoughts. 

Some background:? When Roland told Mike Swartz that we were not going to turn 
cartwheels to produce Enron witnesses to, effectively, Farallon's counsel, he 
got quite huffy.? Shortly after that, I received a call from Oaktree's 
General Counsel reminding me of Enron's responsibilities under the Release.? 
You may get a call also, from either Ken Liang or Brian Berman.

In the meantime, as you will see from the attached draft, we have discovered 
that the Release it clearly provides that Oaktree will not disclose anything 
it learns from Enron to it co-plaintiff Farallon.? Given that, how can 
Hennegan interview Brian--is he promising not to tell his client Farallon 
what he learns on behalf of his client Oaktree?? I think we are on good 
grounds, but we definitely should talk about this.

Steve? 

-----Original Message----- 
From:?? Tellis, Roland 
Sent:?? Tuesday, May 16, 2000 5:57 PM 
To:???? Howard, Steve 
Subject:??????? Draft letter to Swartz 

 <<3_CKX01!.DOC>>  

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential 
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee 
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify 
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer. 


 - 3_CKX01!.DOC