One point you were checking was the CA.  Any luck?

I called pulled off track on a couple of things, but I can get back to this 
now.  Billy Fleenor says he has some thoughts on structure from a M-to-M 
standpoint.  Are you guys interested in having that conversation at this time?

Kay


From: William Keeney/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/21/2001 01:18 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: RE: NRG bullet points

Kay:

Any progress on drafting a letter of intent, or are you still waiting on 
feedback from the team?

Just let me know.  Thanks!
Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay  
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:20 AM
To: Manis, Herman; Fleenor, William
Cc: May, Tom; Keeney, William; Marks, David; Scheuer, Janelle
Subject: Re: NRG bullet points

Herman/Billy,

This is still very early in the process, but some thought as to structure 
options for earning recognition might be worthwhile.  

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/17/2001 09:17 
AM ---------------------------


Kay Mann
05/16/2001 12:36 PM
To: William Keeney/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Marks/ENRON@enronXgate, Janelle 
Scheuer/ENRON@enronXgate 

Subject: Re: NRG bullet points   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >> 

I've made some revisions the Bill's document to make sure we are on the same 
page before I prepare the LOI.  

 << File: NRG Term Sheet.doc >> 

Do we want to give any sort of description of how the benchmark will be set?
Do we want to mention the cancellation provisions?

Thanks,

Kay