So I guess Calpine doesn't have to veto CEERT's involvement in the call for
contract reform
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marilyn Hawes" <marilyn@cleanpower.org>
To: <vjw@ceert.org>; <flak2@aol.com>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:20 PM
Subject: FW: for Board review and comment


>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cavanagh, Ralph [mailto:rcavanagh@nrdc.org]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:22 PM
> To: marilyn@ceert.org
> Subject: FW: for Board review and comment
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cavanagh, Ralph
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:00 PM
> To: V. John White (E-mail)
> Subject: FW: for Board review and comment
>
>
> as requested.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hap.Boyd@enron.com [mailto:Hap.Boyd@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:12 AM
> To: Rachel McMahon
> Cc: Cavanagh, Ralph; steve_ponder@fpl.com; jweisgall@aol.com;
> joer@calpine.com
> Subject: Re: for Board review and comment
>
>
>
> John,
> As you know I do not favor attacking the DWR contracts. I don't want our
> company name associated with such an attack. The companies that
> negotiated
> the contracts did so in good faith at a time when prices were high and
> expected to continue so. We have defended contract sanctity in the past
> and
> should continue to do so. If copanies want to voluntarily renegotiate,
> that
> is up to them and DWR. I intend to stay out of it and would urge CEERT
> to
> do the same.
> Hap
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
> or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
> hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
> create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
> Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
> party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
> estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************