Summarizing the Board's Decision
Once you have completed the fact chronology and list of actor & object
types, you are ready to proceed to transcribing the board's decision. Even
though the cases typically list "Discussion" before "Conclusion", you will
first transcribe the decision, and then the analysis used to support that
decision.
Scroll down through the text of the case to the "Conclusion" section.
This section presents direct judgments on the questioned facts from the
chronology. For each questioned fact, you will need to create a three-line
summary of the board's decision of that fact. These summaries are placed
in the transcript under the heading, "The Board's Analysis."
-
Questioned Fact(s) [number]:
-
If there is more than one questioned fact, replace the word number
with the number of the question. That is, "Question 1" or "Q1" in the case
becomes "Questioned Fact(s) 1" in the transcript.
-
To the right of this label, add the number of the questioned fact from
the fact chronology.
-
Questioned Actor or Actors:
-
To the right of this label, list the actor or actors whose actions are
being questioned in this fact.
-
The Board's Conclusion:
-
To the right of this label, add the decision of the board. Only one of
two words is valid; either the decision is "Ethical" or it is "Unethical."
In Case 83-1, there are three questioned
facts, so you need to create three summaries.
-
Q1. It was unethical for Engineer A to notify clients of Engineer B
that Engineer A was planning to start a firm and would appreciate being
considered for work while still in the employ of Engineer B.
-
This is the first questioned fact, so change the label to say, "Questioned
Fact(s) 1".
It corresponds to fact number four in the chronology, so enter "Fact
4" next to that label.
Engineer A's action was questioned, so add "Engineer A" next to the
second label.
The board's decision was "Unethical", so add this next to the final
label.
-
Q2. It was not unethical for Engineer B to distribute a previously printed
brochure listing Engineer A as a key employee provided Engineer B apprised
the prospective client during the negotiation of-Engineer A's pending termination.
-
This is the second questioned fact, so change the label to say, "Questioned
Fact(s) 2".
It corresponds to fact number five in the chronology, so enter "Fact
5" next to that label.
Engineer B's action was questioned, so add "Engineer B" next to the
second label.
The board's decision was "not unethical", so add the word "Ethical"
next to the final label.
-
Q3. It was unethical for Engineer B to distribute a brochure listing
Engineer A as a key employee after Engineer A's actual termination.
-
This is the third questioned fact, so change the label to say, "Questioned
Fact(s) 3".
It corresponds to fact number seven in the chronology, so enter "Fact
7" next to that label.
Engineer B's action was questioned, so add "Engineer B" next to the
second label.
The board's decision was "unethical", so add that next to the final
label.
Before you continue, you should save your transcript file.
[Main Page]
[Backward to Listing the Actors & Objects]
[Forward to Listing the Cited Codes]