Engineering Services Included as Part of Material Promotion and Sales
Code Citations: [10(a)] [8(a)] [8] [9(a)] [9(e)]
Case Citations: NONE
A government agency programs the construction of a bridge. It retains a consulting engineer to design the total structure. An engineer who is a sales representative of Firm A, which produces and sells prestressed concrete bridge members, contacts the consulting engineer and requests him to consider using Firm A's material. The engineer of Firm A indicates that his firm will provide the design of the superstructure incorporating its product at no charge to the consulting engineer, and that this design will be performed by licensed professional engineers.
1. Is it ethical for the engineer of Firm A to make such an offer?
2. Is it ethical for the consulting engineer to accept such an offer?
Code 9(a) states that the engineer "will not undertake or agree to perform any engineering service on a free basis" (except for types of organizations not involved in this case).
Code 9(e) specifies further that, "If in sales employ, he will not offer, or give engineering consultation, or designs, or advice, other than specifically applying to the equipment being sold."
In the present context, we understand "equipment" to include manufactured products, such as precast prestressed concrete units; and this might be extended to other manufactured materials. This is indicated by Code 10(a), which states the engineer ". . . will not accept financial or other considerations, including free engineering designs, from material or equipment suppliers for specifying their product."
The engineer of Firm A is in violation of Code 9(a) . Under Code 9(e) he might offer advice about the characteristics and properties of the product being sold by his firm, but is clearly prohibited from executing the design of the superstructure incorporating the product being sold without a contract for an appropriate fee with the consulting engineer for such engineering service.
Under the circumstances in the facts, the consulting engineer is in violation of Code 10(a) and would also appear to violate his responsibility to be honest and impartial.
If, on the other hand, the consulting engineer believes the construction material (product) proposed by Firm A is best in the client's interest, and proposes to contract for an appropriate fee with Firm A for the necessary engineering design, he must under Code 8 and Code 8(a) disclose such activity to his client.
1. It is unethical for the engineer of Firm A to make such an offer which involves "free" engineering service.
2. It is unethical for the consulting engineer to accept such an offer under the circumstances stated in the facts.
Board of Ethical Review
T. C. COOKE, P.E., L. R. DURKEE, P.E., A. C. KIRKWOOD, P E., WALDEMAR S. NELSON, P.E., N. O. SAULTER, P.E., KURT F. WENDT, P.E., PHIL T. ELLIOTT, P.E., Chairman
[Disclaimer]