Newsgroups: sci.image.processing
From: paul@pcserv.demon.co.uk (Paul Carpenter)
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!news.alpha.net!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!news.sprintlink.net!peernews.demon.co.uk!pcserv.demon.co.uk!paul
Subject: Re: Image Capture Quality ??
References: <Pine.SCO.3.91.950217092646.974A-10000
Organization: PC Services
Reply-To: paul@pcserv.demon.co.uk
Followup-To: sci.imag.processing
X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.29
Lines: 26
X-Posting-Host: pcserv.demon.co.uk
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 1995 22:17:55 +0000
Message-ID: <793059475snz@pcserv.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk

addgr@athena.compulink.forthnet.gr "Dimitris Emmanolopoulos" writes:
-I use to capture images of small objects using a TR-350 SONY camera.
-As capture card I use Screen Machine of FAST (Germany). I have the camera 
-on a stand.

I am not familiar with the camera, but will see if I have any specs around. I
thought the Screen Machine was a multimedia card not meant for image processing
and like a lot of these cards suffers from 'viewable' not processable results.
I have heard of other sites who went that route and are now throwing them away
for better quality digitisers.

-I am not happy with the result. The quality of the captured image is not 
-what I would like to have.

See above

-I think that the problem is the camera and maybe the lighting.
-Using what equipment you think I could have the best results.
-I need to use a more professional camera or capture card ??

Problem could be lighting, lens, camera, grabber or a combination, but as you
don't say what type of quality problem I can not give a simple answer nor I 
doubt anybody else will as the problem is not described.

-- 
Paul - "Any people you should meet are the products of a deranged imagination"
