Newsgroups: sci.image.processing
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!NewsWatcher!user
From: mhm@netcom.com (Maxwell Miller)
Subject: Re: Q: human visual system's response to magnitude and phase of image?
Message-ID: <mhm-1602951843420001@192.0.2.1>
Sender: mhm@netcom17.netcom.com
Organization: Cyberspace
References: <3hte8a$mjm@ra.lib.ucalgary.ca> <3htggg$cmu@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 1995 23:42:27 GMT
Lines: 19

I am not familiar with any published research since the origional
Oppenheimer paper that reports the human visual system being more
sensitive to phase differences than to magnitude differences. I 
haven't looked at the literature in a couple of years but would be 
interested if any other (published) research supports this.


In article <3htggg$cmu@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>,
skurucay@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Saban Kurucay) wrote:

>      I would say the human eye is much more sensitive to the phase of an image
>      Below I list some references for interested people.
> References:
> 
> A.V. Oppenheim and J.S. Lim, "The importance of phase in signals,"Proceedings
> of the IEEE, Vol. 69, 529-541 (1981).
> 
> M.H. Hayes, J.S. Lim and A.V. Oppenheim, "Signal reconstruction from phase or
> magnitude," IEEE ASSP, Vol-28, 672-80 (1980).
