Newsgroups: sci.image.processing
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!news.duke.edu!agate!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!olea
From: olea@netcom.com (Michael Olea)
Subject: Re: Digital tampering
Message-ID: <oleaD6sxzK.8oK@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <8A6C278.11370002FA.uuout@onlinesys.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 1995 04:33:19 GMT
Lines: 20
Sender: olea@netcom13.netcom.com

duane.capener@onlinesys.com (DUANE CAPENER) writes:

>I'm gathering information on the practice of digitally altering
>photographic images for the purpose of deception.  With the current
>state-of-the-art technology, it is becoming virtually impossible to tell
>if a picture has been tampered with.  Conversely, counter technologies
>are being developed to reveal the authenticity of publicly released
>photos.

>If anyone knows of any recent newspaper or magazine articles on the
>topic, or if you have a personal opinion, please let me know.

>Thanks in advance.
>Duane

	Not terribly recent, but last year (I'm pretty sure) there
was an article in Scientific American devoted to the subject - it's
the issue that has Abe Lincoln arm in arm with Marylin Monroe on
the cover.

