# Some emacs regular expressions that were helpfull in formatting this file from Carlos' original
# 
# place () around things
# 
# special case for object
# object \(\S +\) = \(\S +\)
# ( object \1 \2 )
# 
# \(\S +\) = \(\S +\)
# ( \1 \2 )
# 
# 
# Get rid of \226
# 
# ?
# 
# 
# Put in () around f-strucutre
# ^\([^(]+\)
# \1( 
# 
# 
# Put in lex and pos features
# ^\(\S +\) \(\S +\)\([^(]+( \)
# \1 \2\3( lex \1 ) ( pos \2 ) 
# 
# remove + -
# \([0-9]\) [-+]
# \1
# 
# 
# oops put back in  + - 
# 
# make camma delimited
#  \(\sw\) \([0-9]+\) 
# , \1, \2, , ,
# 
# 
# Change the POS A to ADJ
#  A, 
#  ADJ, 
#
#  ( pos ASuff )
#  ( pos ADJSuff )
#
# Change the part-of-speech in the f-structure to be XSuff
# ( pos \(\S +\) )
# ( pos \1Suff )

a,        V, 4,   ,  , ( ( lex a ) ( pos VSuff ) ( TENSE future ) ) 

;; general comment: (tense = fut) is used in the parole-mapping instead of (tense = future)



alu,      V, 1,   , -, ( ( lex alu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( TENSE future ) )

;; I think that it needs more features, or it could be considered two suffixes (a-lu), I'm not sure what's better.
-lu is a non-finite marker (although it is tensed, it cannot have subject agreement) 
a possible feature for this suffix is: 
(nom-type = SVN) (for nominalization-type, Subjective Verbal Noun, following Smeets). 
it would be important to have all these nominalizers/non-finite markers under the same 
attribute (nom-type) with different values.

chi,      V, 1,  -, +, ( ( lex chi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD imperative ) )

;; general comment: (NUMBER = sg) is used in the parole-mapping instead of (NUMBER = singular) 
	       (mood = imper) is used in the parole-mapping instead of (mood = imperative) 

eimeu, V, 1, +, -, ( ( lex eimeu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( object PERSON 1 ) ( object NUMBER plural ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; general comment: (NUMBER = pl) is used in the parole-mapping instead of (NUMBER = plural)
;;                : (mood = ind) is used in the parole-mapping instead of (mood = indicative)
;; this is the lexical entry I'm using:

VSuff::VSuff |: [en] -> [""] ( (X1::Y1) ((x0 voice) = inv) ((x0
PERSON) = 1) ((x0 NUMBER) = pl) ((x0 object PERSON) = 3) ((x0 mood) =
ind) ) where person and number refer to subject agreement (-i). 
It seems that the lexical entry in the file reflects my mistake when I present the topic in the meeting.  

el,       V, 19,  ,  , ( ( lex el ) ( pos VSuff ) ( BENEFACTIVE + ) )

;; I don't see why applicative should be splited between benefactive
and malefactive.  (el/lel, benefactive, ma,ma, malefactive). There is a difference, but the difference is neutralized in 
Spanish (and according to some sources, also in Mapudungun).
I think both cases can be handled by the same rule. I would suggest (applicative = +) as the relevant 
feature for the set of suffixes.  

en,       V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex en ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( object PERSON 1 ) ( object NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) )
;; this is the lexical entry I'm using:

VSuff::VSuff |: [en] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0 PERSON) = 1)
((x0 NUMBER) = sg)
((x0 object PERSON) = 2)
((x0 object NUMBER) = sg)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

eneu,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex eneu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( object PERSON 1 ) ( object NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) )
;; this is the lexical entry I'm using:

VSuff::VSuff |: [eneu] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0  PERSON) = 1)
((x0  NUMBER) = sg)
((x0 object PERSON) = 3)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

eyeu,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex eyeu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE + ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; I'm using:  

VSuff::VSuff |: [eyeu] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0  PERSON) = 3)
((x0 object PERSON) = 3)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

Regarding proximative, I don't really know how this feature is going to work in the transfer system. 
It has to do with discourse information that I don't have completely clear in theoretical terms,
(and I'm even less clear about how it can be use by a machine translation system). 
Anyway, I don't see any problem in keeping the feature in the lexical entry and see if later we can meke use of it.  

eymeu,    V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex eymeu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( object PERSON 2 ) ( object NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; this is the lexical entry I'm using:

VSuff::VSuff |: [eymeu] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0 PERSON) = 2)
((x0 NUMBER) = sg)
((x0 object PERSON) = 3)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

eymumeu,  V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex eymumeu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( object PERSON 2 ) ( object NUMBER dual ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; I'm using: 

VSuff::VSuff |: [eymumeu] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0 PERSON) = 2)
((x0 NUMBER) = dual)
((x0 object PERSON) = 3)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

eym;; I'm using:

VSuff::VSuff |: [eym(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0 PERSON) = 2)
((x0 NUMBER) = pl)
((x0 object PERSON) = 3)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

eyu,      V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex eyu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( object PERSON 2 ) ( object NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; I'm using:

VSuff::VSuff |: [eyu] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0  PERSON) = 2)
((x0  NUMBER) = sg)
((x0 object PERSON) = 1)
((x0 object NUMBER) = sg)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

eyumeu,   V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex eyumeu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( object PERSON 1 ) ( object NUMBER dual ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; I'm using:

VSuff::VSuff |: [eyumeu] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0 PERSON) = 1)
((x0 NUMBER) = dual)
((x0 object PERSON) = 3)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

f,        V, 3,   ,  , ( ( lex f ) ( pos VSuff ) ( RUPTURED-IMPLIC + ) )

;; I don't find ruptured-implicature very convenient (it seems to me that it is not totally clear what it means). 
maybe we should re discuss this, but in every instance of this suffix I have found in the corpus,
it is translated using the Spanish imperfective past (this is also the gloss in some grammars),
maybe it won't work in 100% of the cases, but it seems that it would work in most cases.
But if we are going to consider f/fu as a tense, and afu as two suffixes (a-fu), there would be a clash. 
So, maybe it would better to consider afu as a unit, that is always translated as the Spanish conditional
(that is a tense (and a mood) in the parole-mapping). 
I don't know to what extent this could be a problem for the morphology.

fal,      ADJ,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex fal ) ( pos ADJSuff ) ( FAL + ) )

;; I think we should find a label different than the suffix itself. 
I'm aware of the existence of a VSuff -fal, but not of an AdjSuff.


fe,       N,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex fe ) ( pos NSuff ) ( FE + ) )

;; this is a derivational suffix (agentive nominals) that maybe should be managed in the lexicon. 


fi,       V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex fi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE + ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

fimi, V, 1, +, -, ( ( lex fimi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER
singular ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE + ) ( MOOD
indicative ) ) fimu, V, 1, +, -, ( ( lex fimu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON
2 ) ( NUMBER dual ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE + ) ( MOOD
indicative ) ) fimfiyi, V, 1, +, -, ( ( lex fiyi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER plural ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE + ) ( MOOD indicative ) )
fiyu,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex fiyu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER dual ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE + ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; I think we can segment fi from subject agreement (only in this case, not in inverse agreement). 
In fact, the grammar is working this way now. In this way, we don't need this entries.
But we need to add this one (the previous entry of -fi in the file is an alomorph of fi(y)): 

VSuff::VSuff |: [fi] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 object PERSON) = 3)
)

Anyway, if it is problematic for the morphology to do it this way, it can be done the other way. 

fu,       V, 3,   ,  , ( ( lex fu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( RUPTURED-IMPLIC + ) )
;;Idem previous alomorph of -fu

i,        V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex i ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE - ) ( MOOD indicative ) )
;; in the version of the grammar I'm working now it is not necessary to have object agreement when it is not overtly marked. 

imi,      V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex imi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE - ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; idem

imu,      V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex imu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER dual ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE - ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; idem

im;; idem

i, V, 1, -, -, ( ( lex i ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER plural ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

i, V, 1, -, +, ( ( lex i ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER plural ) ( MOOD imperative ) )

i, V, 1, +, -, ( ( lex i ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER plural ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE - ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; idem

ka,       V, 11,  ,  , ( ( lex ka ) ( pos VSuff ) ( DISTRIBUTIVE + ) )

;; I think that this is the (aspect = continuative) suffix. I don't know of a verbal distributive suffix, 
but sometimes the adjectival pluralizer -ke is called distributive. 

ke,       V, 8,   ,  , ( ( lex ke ) ( pos VSuff ) ( ASPECT habitual ) )

ke,       ADJ,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex ke ) ( pos ADJSuff ) ( NUMBER plural ) )

kl,        V, 23,  ,  , ( ( lex l ) ( pos VSuff ) ( CAUSATIVE + ) )

;; Are we going to derive causatives in the grammar or in the lexicon?

l,        V, 19,  ,  , ( ( lex l ) ( pos VSuff ) ( BENEFACTIVE + ) )

;; idem other cases of applicatives.

la,       V, 5,   ,  , ( ( lex la ) ( pos VSuff ) ( NEGATION + ) )

le,       V, 20,  ,  , ( ( lex le ) ( pos VSuff ) ( ASPECT progressive ) )

lel,      V, 19,  ,  , ( ( lex lel ) ( pos VSuff ) ( BENEFACTIVE + ) )

;; idem other cases of applicatives.

le,       V, 1,  -,  , ( ( lex le ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( MOOD irrealis ) )

;; general comment: (mood = subj) is used in the parole-mapping instead of (mood = irrealis)

li,       V, 1,  -,  , ( ( lex li ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD irrealis ) )

liyi, V, 1, -, , ( ( lex liyi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER plural ) ( MOOD irrealis ) )

liyu,     V, 1,  -,  , ( ( lex liyu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER dual ) ( MOOD irrealis ) )

lmi,      V, 1,  -,  , ( ( lex lmi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD irrealis ) )

lmu,      V, 1,  -,  , ( ( lex lmu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER dual ) ( MOOD irrealis ) )

lmme,       V, 13,  ,  , ( ( lex me ) ( pos VSuff ) ( DIR-ME + ) )

;; I would prefer to use labels that are different from the suffixes themselves. For directional -me, 
Zor (directional = th). The terminology for this directional is not very clear, but the terminology
for the other directionals is more clear and helpful: (cis)locative and (trans)locative.  

mu,       V, 1,  -, +, ( ( lex mu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER dual ) ( MOOD imperative ) )

mui, V, 1, +, -, ( ( lex mui ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( object PERSON 1 ) ( object NUMBER plural ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; I'm using this:

VSuff::VSuff |: [mui] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0 PERSON) = 1)
((x0 NUMBER) = pl)
((x0 object PERSON) = 2)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)


mun,      V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex mun ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER non-singular ) ( object PERSON 1 ) ( object NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; I'm using this:

VSuff::VSuff |: [mun] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0 PERSON) = 1)
((x0 NUMBER) = sg)
((x0 object PERSON) = 2)
((x0 object NUMBER) = pl)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

I still havent solved the problem of dual objects. 

m
muyu,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex muyu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( object PERSON 1 ) ( object NUMBER dual ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; I'm using this:

VSuff::VSuff |: [muyu] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0 PERSON) = 1)
((x0 NUMBER) = dual)
((x0 object PERSON) = 2)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

n,        V, 1,  -, -, ( ( lex n ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

n,        V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex n ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE - ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; in the version of the grammar I'm working now it is not necessary to have object agreement when it is not overtly marked. 

nge,      V, 17,  ,  , ( ( lex nge ) ( pos VSuff ) ( VOICE passive ) )

nge,      V, 1,  -, +, ( ( lex nge ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD imperative ) )

ntu,      N,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex ntu ) ( pos NSuff ) ( NTU + ) )

;; it is a derivational suffix that maybe should be handled in the lexicon.

pa,       V, 13,  ,  , ( ( lex pa ) ( pos VSuff ) ( DIR-PA + ) )

;; I would prefer to use labels that are different from the suffixes themselves. 
(directional = cis) for cislocative seems to be a good option. 

pe,       V, 10,  ,  , ( ( lex pe ) ( pos VSuff ) ( VAL-PE + ) )

;; It seems that -pe has different modal values. Maybe, it would be necessary to 
have more than one lexical entry. Zdub(itative) and cert(ain).

pe,       V, 1,  -, +, ( ( lex pe ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( MOOD imperative ) )

pu,       V, 13,  ,  , ( ( lex pu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( DIR-PU + ) )

;; I would prefer to use labels that are different from the suffixes themselves. 
(directional = trans) for translocative seems to be a good option. 

rke,      V, 7,   ,  , ( ( lex rke ) ( pos VSuff ) ( VAL-RKE + ) )

;; it seems to me that (reportative = +) is a better option. 

tu,       V, 9,   ,  , ( ( lex tu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( ASPECT repetitive ) )

;; in the version of the grammar I'm working now it is not necessary to have object agreement when it is not overtly marked. 

;; idem -rke

uw,       V, 21,  ,  , ( ( lex uw ) ( pos VSuff ) ( RECIPROCAL + ) )

w,        V, 21,  ,  , ( ( lex w ) ( pos VSuff ) ( RECIPROCAL + ) )

we,       V, 16,  ,  , ( ( lex we ) ( pos VSuff ) ( ASPECT repetitive ) )

;; -we is an aspectual marker that is sometimes glossed as 'already'.
it could be (aspect = already), although it is not very elegant as a label. 

we,       N,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex we ) ( pos NSuff ) ( WE + ) )

;; other derivational suffix that maybe should be managed in the lexicon.  

wen,      N,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex wen ) ( pos NSuff ) ( NUMBER plural ) )

wimi,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex wimi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( object PERSON 2 ) ( object NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; I'm using this:

VSuff::VSuff |: [wimi] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0 PERSON) = 2)
((x0 NUMBER) = sg)
((x0 object PERSON) = 2)
((x0 object NUMBER) = sg)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

wimu,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex wimu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER dual ) ( object PERSON 2 ) ( object NUMBER dual ) ( MOOD indicative ) )


VSuff::VSuff |: [wimu] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0 PERSON) = 2)
((x0 NUMBER) = dual)
((x0 object PERSON) = 2)
((x0 object NUMBER) = dual)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

but I still haven't written a rule to deal with dual objects. 

wim;; I'm using this: 

VSuff::VSuff |: [wim(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0 PERSON) = 2)
((x0 NUMBER) = pl)
((x0 object PERSON) = 2)
((x0 object NUMBER) = pl)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

wiyi, V, 1, +, -, ( ( lex wiyi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER plural ) ( object PERSON 1 ) ( object NUMBER plural ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; I'm using this:

VSuff::VSuff |: [wiyi] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0  PERSON) = 1)
((x0  NUMBER) = pl)
((x0 object PERSON) = 1)
((x0 object NUMBER) = pl)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)



wiyi, V, 1, +, -, ( ( lex wiyi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER non-singular ) ( object PERSON 2 ) ( object NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; I'm using this:

VSuff::VSuff |: [wiyi] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0  PERSON) = 2)
((x0 object PERSON) = 1)
((x0 object NUMBER) = pl
((x0 mood) = ind)
)


wiyi, V, 1, +, -, ( ( lex wiyi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( object PERSON 2 ) ( object NUMBER non-singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; and this one:


VSuff::VSuff |: [wiyi] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0  PERSON) = 2)
((x0 object PERSON) = 1)
((x0 object NUMBER) = dual)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

with the same problem with dual objects.

wiyu,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex wiyu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER dual ) ( object PERSON 1 ) ( object NUMBER dual ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; I'm using: 

VSuff::VSuff |: [wiyu] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0 PERSON) = 1)
((x0 NUMBER) = dual)
((x0 object PERSON) = 1)
((x0 object NUMBER) = dual)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

w;; I'm using:

VSuff::VSuff |: [w(
(X1::Y1)
((x0 voice) = inv)
((x0 PERSON) = 1)
((x0 NUMBER) = sg)
((x0 object PERSON) = 1)
((x0 object NUMBER) = sg)
((x0 mood) = ind)
)

y,        V, 1,  -, -, ( ( lex y ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

ya,       V, 4,   ,  , ( ( lex ya ) ( pos VSuff ) ( TENSE future ) )

ymi,      V, 1,  -, -, ( ( lex ymi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

ymu,      V, 1,  -, -, ( ( lex ymu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER dual ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

ymyngu,     V, 1,  -, -, ( ( lex yngu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( NUMBER dual ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

yngyu,       V, 1,  -, -, ( ( lex yu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER dual ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

yu,       V, 1,  -, +, ( ( lex yu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER dual ) ( MOOD imperative ) )

yu,       V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex yu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER dual ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE - ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; in the version of the grammar I'm working now it is not necessary to have object agreement when it is not overtly marked. 

lu,       V, 1,   , -, ( ( lex lu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( SUBJ-NON-FINITE + ) )

;; (nom-type = SVN) (for Subjective Verbal Noun, following Smeets) seems to be better.  


meu,      N,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex meu ) ( pos NSuff ) ( CASE oblique ) )

The lexical entry (for another allomorph) I'm using is:

NSuff::PREP |: [mu] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
)

(the form of the preposition is determined by the rule)

I don't know if the case feature needs to be included. In case of being included, in the parole mapping 
it appears as (case = obl) 



ntu,      N,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex ntu ) ( pos NSuff ) ( CHARACTERISTIC-PL + ) )

;; this is a derivational suffix 

em,       N,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex em ) ( pos NSuff ) ( ACTIVE - ) )

;; maybe to be handled in the lexicon. 

yem,      N,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex yem ) ( pos NSuff ) ( ACTIVE - ) )

;; maybe to be handled in the lexicon

el,       V, 1,   , -, ( ( lex el ) ( pos VSuff ) ( OBJ-NON-FINITE + ) )

;; I would suggest (nom-type = OVN) (Objective Verbal Noun, following Smeets). 

l,        V, 1,   , -, ( ( lex l ) ( pos VSuff ) ( OBJ-NON-FINITE + ) )

;; idem

nu,       V, 5,   ,  , ( ( lex nu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( NEGATION + ) )


am,       V, 1,   , -, ( ( lex am ) ( pos VSuff ) ( INSTR-NON-FINITE + ) )

;; It seems that this is a-m, future + IVN (Instrumental Verbal Noun), 
used in final clauses. I'm not sure if it has to be considered a unit or not, but 
I think that (nom-type = IVN) should be used for -m alone. 

m,        V, 1,   , -, ( ( lex m ) ( pos VSuff ) ( INSTR-NON-FINITE = +

;; I would suggest (nom-type = IVN) (Instrumental Verbal Noun, following Smeets).  

engengu,     V, 0,   ,  , ( ( lex engu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( NUMBER dual ) )

yi, V, 1, -, -, ( ( lex yi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER plural ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

yi, V, 1, -, +, ( ( lex yi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER plural ) ( MOOD imperative ) )

yi, V, 1, +, -, ( ( lex yi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER plural ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE - ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; we can get rid off the object marking

iyi, V, 1, -, -, ( ( lex iyi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER plural ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

iyi, V, 1, -, +, ( ( lex iyi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER plural ) ( MOOD imperative ) )

iyi, V, 1, +, -, ( ( lex iyi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER plural ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE - ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; we can get rid off the object marking

y;; I don't know a good label, but I think it should a value of (nom-type).

eteu,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex eteu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( MOOD indicative ) ( OBJ-NON-FINITE + ) )

;; this is the inverse form of -el (OVN). 
I havent written the lexical entry or the rules for these forms. 
(mood = indicative) shouldn't be included in the lexical entry because these forms should 
be translated as non-finite Spanish forms and infinitive, participle, etc, are 
considered moods in the parole-mapping. 


fiel,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex fiel ) ( pos VSuff ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( MOOD indicative ) ( OBJ-NON-FINITE + ) )

;; I would suggest (nom-type = TVN) (Transitive Verbal Noun)
idem -eteu

fiel,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex fiel ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( object PERSON 2 ) ( object NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) ( OBJ-NON-FINITE + ) )

;; idem

fiel,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex fiel ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( object PERSON 1 ) ( object NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) ( OBJ-NON-FINITE + ) )

;; idem

filu,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex filu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( MOOD indicative ) ( OBJ-NON-FINITE + ) )

;; this is a form of SVN. 
(mood = indicative) shouldn't be included. 
I haven't written the lexical entry/rules. 

filu,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex filu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 1 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( object PERSON 2 ) ( object NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) ( OBJ-NON-FINITE = + ) )

;; idem


mu,       V, 17,  ,  , ( ( lex mu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( DIR-MU + ) )

;; I cannot find these suffix anywhere.  

k;; I'm not sure how to deal with this suffix,
but it seems that maybe it would have to be managed in the lexicon plus a rule of auxiliary insertion. 
(more or less like -nie).

tu,       V, 23,  ,  , ( ( lex tu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( VERBALIZER hacer ) )

;; I think that we are going to deal with verbalizers in the lexicon.

ke,       N,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex ke ) ( pos NSuff ) ( NUMBER plural ) )

p;; I don't have a lexical entry for this NSuff/postposition, but I would suggest something 
along the lines of meu/mu.


;; idem

che,      N,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex che ) ( pos NSuff ) ( N persona ) )

;; we have to decide how are we going to deal with compounding.

tu,       N,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex tu ) ( pos NSuff ) ( LOC tu ) )

;; maybe to be managed in the lexicon


eymu,     V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex eymu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( object PERSON 2 ) ( object NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; we can get rid off the object marking. 

nga,      V, 0,   ,  , ( ( lex nga ) ( pos VSuff ) ( TENSE conditional ) )

;; as far as I know, nga is a particle, a kind of complementizer, that has many meanings. 
I don't know how to deal with it right now, but I don't think it should be labeled 
(tense = conditional). It appears in interrrogative sentences, as well as in other contexts.

may,      V, 0,   ,  , ( ( lex may ) ( pos VSuff ) ( MAY + ) )

;; another particle. It could mean 'yes', among other meanings. 
I don't have a lexical entry to propose right now. 

ma,       V, 19,  ,  , ( ( lex ma ) ( pos VSuff ) ( APPL malefactive ) )

;; idem other applicatives.ma, V, 19, , , ( ( lexma ) ( pos VSuff ) ( APPL malefactive ) )

;; idem other applicatives. 


fiy,      V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex fiy ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE + ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; in the present version of the grammar it can be fi-y and this lexical entry is not needed.
Could it be a problem for the morphology?

;; idem -rke

am,       V, 0,   ,  , ( ( lex am ) ( pos VSuff ) ( INTERROGATIVE + ) )

;; although the particle am appears frequently in interrogative sentences, it can
also appear in other contexts. 

am,       V, 0,   ,  , ( ( lex am ) ( pos VSuff ) ( COMP como ) )

;; I'm not sure what that it means. 


llemay,   V, 0,   ,  , ( ( lex llemay ) ( pos VSuff ) ( MAY + ) )

;; idem may

fe,       N,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex fe ) ( pos NSuff ) ( NOMINALIZER agente ) )

;; this suffix can attach to verbs and nouns and derive agentive nominals. 
I think that it has to be managed in the lexicon. 

nie,      V, 23,  ,  , ( ( lex nie ) ( pos VSuff ) ( V tener ) )

;; to be managed in the lexicon

mu,       V, 0,   ,  , ( ( lex mu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( POSTPOSITION por ) )

;; I'm not sure what that it means.

mu,       N,  ,   ,  , ( ( lex mu ) ( pos NSuff ) ( POSTPOSITION por ) )

;; I'm using this lexical entry: 

NSuff::PREP |: [mu] -> [""]
(
(X1::Y1)
)

mu,       V, 0,   ,  , ( ( lex mu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( COMP cuando ) )

;; I'm not sure what that it means. 


rupu,     V, 14,  ,  , ( ( lex rupu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( ASPECT continuative ) )
 

ye,       V, 15,  ,  , ( ( lex ye ) ( pos VSuff ) ( NUMBER plural ) )

;; I cannot find this suffix anywhere. It is not clear to me how it interacts 
with the subject agreement in the verb. There is a verbalizer -ye.



filmi,    V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex filmi ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE + ) ( MOOD irrealis ) )

;; it could be parsed as fi-lmi


feeneu,   V, 1,  +, -, ( ( lex feeneu ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 3 ) ( object PERSON 1 ) ( object NUMBER singular ) ( MOOD indicative ) )

;; it is not clear to me if this is an alomorph of eneu or if this suffix carries additional grammatical information. 



film;; it could be parsed as fi-lm
fe,       V, 1,  -, +, ( ( lex fe ) ( pos VSuff ) ( PERSON 2 ) ( NUMBER singular ) ( object PERSON 3 ) ( object PROXIMATE + ) ( MOOD imperative ) )