 
  
  
   
It is common in mathematics to prove a theorem p by assuming it
is false and deriving a contradiction, i.e., derive false
or something equivalent to false, like   .  The justification for this
proof technique is the following property about implication, repeated
from Section 2:
 .  The justification for this
proof technique is the following property about implication, repeated
from Section 2:
 
  
   
By substituting   for p and using double negation, we derive
the theorem:
  for p and using double negation, we derive
the theorem:
 
  (Proof by Contradiction)
 (Proof by Contradiction)
  
Hence, having proved that   is a
theorem,
you may conclude that p is a theorem.
  is a
theorem,
you may conclude that p is a theorem.