
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 01:28:00 -0800 (PST)
From: victor.lamadrid@enron.com
To: joan.veselack@enron.com
Subject: Re: Dayton Stuff & Calp & other fun stuff
Cc: joann.collins@enron.com, robert.allwein@enron.com, katherine.kelly@enron.com,
chris.germany@enron.com
Bcc: joann.collins@enron.com, robert.allwein@enron.com, katherine.kelly@enron.com,
chris.germany@enron.com

Answers to your quetions:
Yes; no; maybe

Just kidding....
Interconnects for Calp and Dayton handled the same...just add those meters to
the sell tkts to CES and the buys are the delivery points.  Don't path the
actual contract in Unify...When we hold that capacity and EDI, we'll path in
Unify.... We don't get the bills from TCO  in January for that contract.  Get
em in February (when we hold the capacity).  They are set up in Unify but we
won't actually use....We are providing that service for those guys.

Try  your best for trueing up the transport tkts and the CALP and Dayton tkts
in Sitara.  Impact is on P and L for the desk daily and later on for the
(O/A) operational analysis where the accountants compare what we estimated
our costs and revenues for the desk were and what they actually came in
at.......We know January will be messy...

Go ahead and true up the PAL agreement to match physical flow......

BUY/SELLS with ENA and CES.  We talked at the beginning of the month about
this.  Sales/buys  to/from ENA on the CES reports and sales/buys to/from CES
on the ENA facilitation by location reports should just be pahted as
buy/sells.  (hopefully should be done already......)

I have a meeting from 3-4 today...other than that I'll be downstairs with
y'all to answer any questions....

THANKS!!!!

