
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 1979 16:00:00 -0800 (PST)
From: chris.germany@enron.com
To: rebecca.cantrell@enron.com
Subject: Re: Transco capacity issue
Cc: colleen.sullivan@enron.com
Bcc: colleen.sullivan@enron.com

The name is PPL ENPLUS which I believe is short for PPL Energy Plus.  I
purchased 4,752 dt on TRANSCO.  The primary receipt point is CNG-Leidy and
the primary delivery point is Mainline BG&E.  The offer number is 21575-001.

I feel comfortable that the points listed above are the primary receipt and
delivery points because of our relationship with Penn Fuel.  Following is the
example Judy and I discussed with Transco.


EXAMPLE
Assume PSE&G has 100,000 dt of telescoped capacity with a primary delivery
point of PSE&G, downstream of Linden.  ENA purchases 20,000 dt of telescoped
capacity from PSE&G under the following scenarios;

1.PSE&G released the capacity with PSE&G as the delivery point.
ENA has primary rights of 20,000 to PSE&G and secondary rights of 20,000 to
New York (no change, same as before).

ENA could flow 20,000 from the Gulf to BG&E (upstream of the Linden and the
Leidy Line) on a primary basis.  AND 20,000 from Nat Fuel-Leidy to PSE&G
which is secondary on the Leidy Line, and Primary on the mainline to PSE&G.
AND 20,000 from Tenn-Rivervale to BUG on a secondary basis.  These paths are
not overlapping and ENA could effectivly schedule






Enron North America Corp.
