
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:56:00 -0800 (PST)
From: jim.pond@enron.com
To: daren.farmer@enron.com
Subject: Re: Tenaska IV 10/00
Cc: greg.whiting@enron.com, troy.klussmann@enron.com, james.armstrong@enron.com,
megan.parker@enron.com
Bcc: greg.whiting@enron.com, troy.klussmann@enron.com, james.armstrong@enron.com,
megan.parker@enron.com

Darren,
The demand fee is probably the best solution.  We can use it to create a
recieivable/payable with Tenaska, depending on which way the calculation goes
each month.  How are PMA's to be handled once the fee been calculated and the
deal put in the system?

Attatched is a schedule detailing what is on the GL for Cleburne as of
today.  Some of this info will change by the end of the month.  As you can
see, there are some discrepancies between Megan's calculations and what is on
the general ledger.  UA4 is also on my schedule.  Unless the buys/sells are
volumetrically balanced, we book an entry to balance the desk.  This will
change the calculation of what is due from/to Tenaska.  Should we be
recording a UA4 entry for Cleburne?  Is it addressed in the agreement with
Tenaska?






