
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 02:37:00 -0800 (PST)
From: victor.lamadrid@enron.com
To: rita.wynne@enron.com, sherlyn.schumack@enron.com
Subject: Re: HPL discrepancy
Cc: clem.cernosek@enron.com, jackie.young@enron.com, meredith.mitchell@enron.com,
cynthia.franklin@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com,
beverly.beaty@enron.com
Bcc: clem.cernosek@enron.com, jackie.young@enron.com, meredith.mitchell@enron.com,
cynthia.franklin@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com,
beverly.beaty@enron.com

Rita, Please help me with this. I have some questions regarding Enerfin.
Why are we re-allocating prior month volumes at Enerfin after we matched your
original numbers back in October? Can't this be fixed in the actualization
process?
The numbers for October between ENA-TETCO and HPL vary a good bit.  Are we
your only customer at that point and why do we show volumes on days ENA had
no transactions with HPL?  Can we simply put zero paths in UNIFY and extend
our existing deals in Sitara with zero volumes and have you guys actualize
these small volumes to handle this?  We go round and round at this point
changing volumes two, three or more times. Call me if you have questions..
Thanks Victor
