
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:51:00 -0800 (PST)
From: charlotte.hawkins@enron.com
To: daren.farmer@enron.com
Subject: Re: Sale to Shoreline
Cc: stella.morris@enron.com, pat.clynes@enron.com
Bcc: stella.morris@enron.com, pat.clynes@enron.com

Daren you are correct in that this was only in MOPS for the 26th.  It was
edi'd over to POPS from the 25th through the 31st populating all days with
the 16,700 nom.  The nom was never -0- out in POPS therefore the change
notification process in POPS did not pick up a change at this meter.  This
meter is pathed by Kim and confirmed by me - it is extremely odd that this
was missed in MOPS.  The record would have been out of balance and someone,
if not several people, normally would make a comment on this.   Also  -  all
of my records indicate that the 16,700 was good through the 31st except the
MOPS entry.  My confirmations with Koch didn't reflect the -0- ;  the last
report I have from Koch indicated the 16,700 stayed on, there was no record
of a phone call indicating anything other than 16,700.  It is very odd for
this many checks and balances to fail.  Also, the volumes were being sent
back to MOPS which no one caught.

I have spoken with Koch today and they agree that the 16,700 should have gone
to -0- therefore I have removed the nom from POPS confirmed volumes and
re-allocated the meter.  The OBA has taken the hit and I am working off the
imbalance now.

Daren, I am sorry that you had to look into this when you feel this is my
responsibility.  Stella was trying to help me out in clearing up errors
because I was buried in current activity, thus the e-mail to you asking for
your help.

If this doesn't answer all the questions, just give me a call.

Thanks,

Charlotte





