
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 06:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: donna.greif@enron.com
To: kathryn.bussell@enron.com, robert.cotten@enron.com, mark.mcclure@enron.com,
gary.payne@enron.com, richard.pinion@enron.com,
robert.superty@enron.com, george.smith@enron.com,
katherine.kelly@enron.com, randall.gay@enron.com,
daren.farmer@enron.com, edward.terry@enron.com
Subject: Re: Sitara Release (Re: Changes in Global due to Consent to
Assignment)
Cc: dave.nommensen@enron.com, diane.niestrath@enron.com,
carrie.hollomon@enron.com, bryce.baxter@enron.com,
kathryn.cordes@enron.com, dana.daigle@enron.com,
elizabeth.hernandez@enron.com, julie.meyers@enron.com,
b.palmer@enron.com, stephanie.sever@enron.com,
dianne.swiber@enron.com, peggy.hedstrom@enron.com,
dianne.seib@enron.com, sylvia.campos@enron.com,
linda.bryan@enron.com, faye.ellis@enron.com,
donna.consemiu@enron.com, scott.mills@enron.com,
russ.severson@enron.com, martha.stevens@enron.com,
karie.hastings@enron.com, regina.perkins@enron.com,
imelda.frayre@enron.com, william.kasemervisz@enron.com,
hunaid.engineer@enron.com, steven.gullion@enron.com,
larrissa.sharma@enron.com, thomas.engel@enron.com
Bcc: dave.nommensen@enron.com, diane.niestrath@enron.com,
carrie.hollomon@enron.com, bryce.baxter@enron.com,
kathryn.cordes@enron.com, dana.daigle@enron.com,
elizabeth.hernandez@enron.com, julie.meyers@enron.com,
b.palmer@enron.com, stephanie.sever@enron.com,
dianne.swiber@enron.com, peggy.hedstrom@enron.com,
dianne.seib@enron.com, sylvia.campos@enron.com,
linda.bryan@enron.com, faye.ellis@enron.com,
donna.consemiu@enron.com, scott.mills@enron.com,
russ.severson@enron.com, martha.stevens@enron.com,
karie.hastings@enron.com, regina.perkins@enron.com,
imelda.frayre@enron.com, william.kasemervisz@enron.com,
hunaid.engineer@enron.com, steven.gullion@enron.com,
larrissa.sharma@enron.com, thomas.engel@enron.com

FYI....

This change went in for the Deal Validation group.   It gives them the
ability to change counterparties names after bridge back.

Impact to Logistics - Unify
If a counterparty name change takes place to deals that have been bridge
backed, it could cause problems on EDI pipes as that new counterparty name
will flow over to Unify and repathing should eventually take place.
One problem may be with the Imbalance data sets, which are not in production
yet......(EDI Imbalance Qtys would not match up to paths)
This may also cause an issue with the scheduled quantities (especially where
nominations were sent for entire month)
can't remember the rules on this one, but I think Unify does have some safe
guards (idiot proofs) to force re-pathing.
Unify does have the ability to over-ride duns numbers, yet would still cause
an additional step for EDI the scheduler would need to think through in order
to get a clean quick response.
What are (if any) impacts to Vol Mgt if counterparty name changes take
place?  (prior periods?  re-pathing?)

I have a call into Diane and Dave both.  After speaking w/ them, hopefully I
can get a clear understanding of the true impact.  I am sure we'll need to
put some processes and procedures together for Deal Validation to follow when
these type of changes are needed.

Will keep you posted.

Thanks,

dg





