
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 08:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: edward.gottlob@enron.com
To: michael.eiben@enron.com
Subject: Re: Fuel
Cc: brenda.herod@enron.com, lisa.csikos@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com,
mary.smith@enron.com, rita.wynne@enron.com,
steve.venturatos@enron.com, pat.clynes@enron.com
Bcc: brenda.herod@enron.com, lisa.csikos@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com,
mary.smith@enron.com, rita.wynne@enron.com,
steve.venturatos@enron.com, pat.clynes@enron.com

Application of the fuel retained from transportation and treating contracts
doesn't have to be done by zone or compressor, in fact I am sure there will
be times when we are either short or long compressor fuel when compared to
the pipelines total usage.  Usually, short.  I just do not think the market
will let me lay off ALL of this risk.  It would be really nice if we could
get the system to track compressor fuel used to service specific contracts
but I am afraid it will always be a facility planning issue.  Fuel should not
cause imbalances on the transportation contract.  A pipeline could be long
fuel due to not running compression and in that case we would have to inject
or hold in linepack the excess.  It seems that we would look at fuel on a
total basis.




