Return-Path: Received: from mx3.andrew.cmu.edu (MX3.andrew.cmu.edu [128.2.10.113]) by mail4.andrew.cmu.edu (Cyrus v2.1.9-071) with LMTP; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:37:55 -0400 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from mx3.andrew.cmu.edu ([unix socket]) by mx3.andrew.cmu.edu (Cyrus v2.1.9-071) with LMTP; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:37:55 -0400 Received: from wmail.atlantic.net (wmail.atlantic.net [209.208.0.84]) by mx3.andrew.cmu.edu (8.12.3.Beta2/8.12.3.Beta2) with SMTP id g9IFbsVn009061 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:37:55 -0400 Received: (qmail 25416 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2002 15:37:53 -0000 Received: from ess-p-144-134-71-13.mega.tmns.net.au (HELO gisligis) (144.134.71.13) by wmail.atlantic.net with SMTP; 18 Oct 2002 15:37:53 -0000 Message-ID: <003401c2774a$7769c1a0$0d478690@gisligis> From: "Giles Jonsson" To: "ckling" References: <19520879.1034792455@cereal.res.cmu.edu> Subject: Re: Urgent: In search of sonar sensor that works in mine Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:35:21 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 1. all of our devices should be suitable for mines, probably the least suitable is the HE240TR. 2. please look at HE240STR it is the same as the HE123 series, it works at 40KHZ in air and 23.5Khz in water. 3. all our devices are intrinsically save, but none are certified. 4. we have nothing beyond our website 5. shipping cost US$80 lead time 1wk. best regards giles jonsson ----- Original Message ----- From: "ckling" To: Cc: Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 3:20 PM Subject: Urgent: In search of sonar sensor that works in mine > To whom it may concern, > > I'm with a project team that is currently developing a pioneering > technology on robots that do exploration into a mine. As such, I'm > interested in knowing the varieties of options that is readily incorporated > into our autonomous robot research project. And one of them involves > sensing, which leads to the reason why I'm writing to you. > > I've seen a range of products offered by your company, and what's appealing > to me is in terms of the size of most of your sonar sensors, i.e. it's > small in size. Now, following are my questions: > > 1. Can you recommend me the best sensor to be used for mine (sensing > capability drops tremendously when it comes to mine - at least for laser). > Recommendations are greatly appreciated. I need some sensing capability > that could at least stretch for a few metres. > > 2. Do you have any sonar sensor that could work for both submerged > (water-proof) and air environment. > > 3. Do you have mine safe sonar sensing equipment, and electronics that > comes with it (which is mine certified as well). > > 4. Other information (with as much details as possible and not the one that > is visible from the website). > > 5. Costs and time of shipment to Pittsburgh, USA. > > We are in need of this technology as soon as possible, and time is > definitely a major factor in our design. > > Also, we are basically a research group of students at Field Robotics > Centre, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, PA, USA working > with some of the expertise in the mine-industry. As I've said before, this > is a pioneering technology and innovations, as such the exists a > possibility of a spin-off company that resulted from this project. > Currently, we are looking at a few sonar sensors to be incorporated into > our prototype robots, and once it's working as expected, we may be > interested in getting more later. > > Do advice us on the above, and also on the costs of the sensors as well. > > Yours Sincerely, > Chin Keong LING > Mobile Robot Development > Carnegie Mellon University > Tel: +1 412 862 2525 > > >