[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Gems 1.17.7.5 Exception from CBallotDlg Error



Done.  I have been thinking the same thing myself lately. 
 
FWIW though, the application name is usually (read, always) implicit in the number.  One could ]suggest that if you don't know what "download 1.17.8 to 1.94t and see if that works" means, you are probably subscribed to the wrong list.  But I am all for conciseness and your point is made.
 
Ken
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Steve Knecht
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 12:45 PM
To: support@gesn.com
Subject: Re: Gems 1.17.7.5 Exception from CBallotDlg Error

Silly request perhaps.  But could you all please put the prefix part of the Revision name in your emails.  For example, what product are we discussing in 3.13.9.2?  I guess its AVTS for NT? 
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Clark
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: Gems 1.17.7.5 Exception from CBallotDlg Error

I should probably mention since its not stated in the bugtrack, the problem is because there is no rich text defined for the voter groups.  You can work around the problem using 3.13.9.2 by either entering the party text, or put a single space in the editor if you really don't want to see the parties.  You don't have to wait for 3.13.11 if you are in a rush.
 
Ken
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Cathi Smothers
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 12:56 PM
To: support@gesn.com
Subject: RE: Gems 1.17.7.5 Exception from CBallotDlg Error

Thanks, Ken.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Ken Clark
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:39 PM
To: support@gesn.com
Subject: RE: Gems 1.17.7.5 Exception from CBallotDlg Error

From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Cathi Smothers
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:57 AM
 
After searching the bugtrack archives on the staff site I found a message submitted on 5/23/01 detailing the same problem.  There is a follow up stating that the problem had been fixed.  However, I can't find an AVTS release after 3-13-9-2 that lists the correction. 
 
Indeed.  Look for a 3.13.10 (or .11 I am not sure yet) later today.  Hopefully it will cure your pain.
 
Ken