Re: Absentee Header Cards? for GEMS

["Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>]

Thanks Jeff.  What do you mean the precinct cards are generic, not
necessarily sequential?
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Hintz <jhglobal@earthlink.net>
To: <support@gesn.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: Absentee Header Cards? for GEMS


> We did Pct. Header cards for Puerto Rico.  They had only 1 style, but had
> around 1700 pcts.  It worked fine for Central Count.  However, the
printing
> of the Pct. Header cards are generic, and not necessarily sequential with
> the Gems Reporting Precincts.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of
> Steve Knecht
> Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 11:16 AM
> To: Global Support
> Subject: Absentee Header Cards? for GEMS
>
>
>
> > Has anyone used Pct. Header cards with GEMS central count?  I seem to
> recall
> > some problem with that in the past - that it had never been done or
> > something.
> >
> > The issue seems to be in Alameda where they use the Spectrum ABS process
> and
> > want to use automated inserting of ballots.   By breaking up ballot
groups
> > into 134 styles vs. 1117 precincts, their roadmap for filling the
inserter
> > and the numbers of ballots they can pull and insert becomes much easier.
> > But they want to count by precinct when they come back.  Can this be
> tested
> > relatively easily by someone in support?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ginnold, Elaine, ROV <eginnold@co.alameda.ca.us>
> > To: 'Steve Knecht' <skglobal@earthlink.net>
> > Cc: Clark, Brad, ROV <bclark@co.alameda.ca.us>
> > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 12:42 PM
> > Subject: RE: Provisionals
> >
> >
> > > Steve,
> > > I'd also like to talk to you about counting av's by precinct and how
to
> do
> > > this without having to order ballots for every precinct.
> > >
> > > Elaine Ginnold
> > >
> > >
> > > > ----------
> > > > From: Steve Knecht[SMTP:skglobal@earthlink.net]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 5:33 PM
> > > > To: Brad Clark; Elaine Ginnold
> > > > Subject: Provisionals
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to understand more about the "long term" provisional
> > requirements
> > > > you see for Alameda County.  I understand that for Piedmont and
> Oakland
> > > > we're using op scan ballots.  However, let's sit down together and
> make
> > > > sure the requirements are clear as we move forward.
> > > >
> > > > Brad, I've got your demo unit.  I'll be out of town next Monday
> through
> > > > Thursday.  Is next Friday OK to bring it to you?  Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Steve Knecht
> > > > Global Election Systems
> > > > 415-893-9941 office   415-893-9951 fax
> > > > 415-225-6591 cell       800-508-5710 pager
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>