Domestic Partners and Same-Sex Marriage
Western Pennsylvania Freedom to Marry Coalition was organized in Pittsburgh to work
for the legal recognition of civil marriage for same-sex couples.
Some Facts about Marriage
- Marriage is not by definition restricted to opposite-sex couples
- Same-sex marriage ceremonies have been known throughout history and throughout
the world. Since definitions of words are meant to be descriptions of actual
usage, the claim that by definition marriage is a relationship between
opposite sex couples is refuted by history. Not long ago the same people now
opposing same-sex marriages were arguing that by definition marriage was
a relationship between persons of the same skin color. The
Constitution of the U. S. is not required to follow either the dictates of a
dictionary or the prejudices of bigots.
- Marriage is not a state endorsement or approval
- A civil marriage license is not a sign that the state endorses or in any way
approves of the couple granted the license. Incarcerated, convicted murderers,
rapists and child molesters are allowed to marry. A marriage license means
nothing more than that the couple meets the minimal requirements to be married
and can properly fill out the application form.
- Marriage is not tied to procreation
- The ability to procreate is not a requirement for marriage. The
purpose of marriage in modern times is first and foremost for companionship and
personal and financial support, and this fact is recognized by laws allowing
marriage of infertile couples, very elderly couples, and couples who use birth
control methods to prevent conception. In a world already overpopulated and
unable to adequately feed everyone, it is irrational for the state to
encourage procreation
- Civil (legal) marriage is not the same as religious marriage (holy matrimony)
- Much of the criticism of the idea of same-sex marriage only seems persuasive because of
the tendency many people have to confuse legal marriage with holy matrimony. The fact
that these are two separate ideas is clear when one realizes that not all marriages are
performed in a church, nor by a religious authority. A justice of the peace can perform
a legal marriage with no accompanying ceremony of holy matrimony.
It happens all the time. Same-sex marriage is about civil (legal) marriage only!
- Legal same-sex marriage would not burden religion
- Legal recognition of same-sex marriages would not impose any burden on
religion. Ministers, priests, rabbis and other religious leaders who are
permitted to perform legal marriages in conjunction with ceremonies of holy
matrimony are not required to perform marriage ceremonies that conflict with
their religious beliefs or conscience. Legal recognition of same-sex marriage
would not change this.
- Legal same-sex marriage would not demean holy matrimony
- The argument that letting same-sex couples marry would demean religious
marriage plays on the confusion between legal marriage and holy matrimony.
Same-sex marriage is about legal marriage and has no implications for religious
marriage. Atheists and other non-Christians are allowed to marry (in the legal
sense) and people don't worry that religious marriage is thereby being
demeaned.
Religious motivations per se are never valid reasons for civil laws
in the U. S., because our constitution guarantees separation of church and
state in order to protect minority religious views.
- Same-sex marriage is not gay marriage
- When opposite-sex couples go to get married, no one asks them if they are
straight. Marriage is not about being straight or gay. Marriage is about
joining one's life with another person for mutual benefits of many sorts, chief
among them being companionship, and personal and financial support. It's not about
sexual orientation and it's not necessarily about sex at all.
Opposite-sex couples with no sexual interest in one another can be legally
married and I know happily married couples who married with no intention of
ever having sex. If opposite-sex marriage is not heterosexual
marriage, by virtual of not necessarily being sexual at all, then same-sex
marriage is not gay marriage.
Recommended Books on Same-Sex Marriage
and Domestic Partners
Phyllis Burke, Family Values, Two Moms and Their Son,
New York: Random House, 1993.
William N. Eskridge, Jr., The Case for Same-Sex Marriage,
New York: The Free Press, 1996.
Kenneth B. Morgen, Getting Simon: Two Gay Doctors' Journey to
Fatherhood, New York: Bramble Books, 1995.
Kath Weston, Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship,
New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.
Return to Duane's home page
Copyright © 1996 Duane T. Williams.
All rights reserved.
Last edited on 29 August 1996.