Node 1
The first node measured is a four-way intersection. The hallways do not coincide here, and there is a set of couches that further interferes. Minima
We can see from the first figure that the observed minima values ranged from 62.6 to 72.8 inches.The overall mean minima value was 66.8 inches, with a standard deviation of 2.2 inches. We can see from the second figure that the mean minima values (mean per sample) ranged from 65.4 to 68.0 inches. The standard deviation of mean minima values was 0.4 inches. Therefore, we have SIGMA_DIST = 0.4 (inches).
Edge angles
The relative edge angles of the meetpoint were about 80, 90, 90 and 100 degrees, as shown in the first figure.From the second figure we see that the asymmetry mean was 23.8 degrees, with a standard deviation of 7.0 degrees. Therefore, we have SIGMA_SYM = 7.0 (degrees).
Node 2
The second node measured is a three-way intersection with two concrete corners and wooden slats on the wall. Minima
We can see from the first figure that the observed minima values ranged from 57.6 to 61.7 inches.The overall mean minima value was 58.9 inches, with a standard deviation of 0.7 inches. We can see from the second figure that the mean minima values (mean per sample) ranged from 57.8 to 61.3 inches. The standard deviation of mean minima values was 0.6 inches. Therefore, we have SIGMA_DIST = 0.6 (inches).
Edge angles
The relative edge angles of the meetpoint were about 120, 120, and 120 degrees, as shown in the first figure.From the second figure we see that the asymmetry mean was 7.8 degrees, with a standard deviation of 2.1 degrees. Therefore, we have SIGMA_SYM = 2.1 (degrees).
Node 3
The third node measured is a three-way intersection where three hallways of different widths merge. Minima
We can see from the first figure that the observed minima values ranged from 82.1 to 87.0 inches.The overall mean minima value was 85.2 inches, with a standard deviation of 0.9 inches. We can see from the second figure that the mean minima values (mean per sample) ranged from 82.5 to 86.3 inches. The standard deviation of mean minima values was 0.9 inches. Therefore, we have SIGMA_DIST = 0.9 (inches).
Edge angles
The relative edge angles of the meetpoint were about 90, 125, and 125 degrees, as shown in the first figure.From the second figure we see that the asymmetry mean was 33.4 degrees, with a standard deviation of 7.2 degrees. Therefore, we have SIGMA_SYM = 7.2 (degrees).
Node 4
The fourth node measured is a three-way intersection with two concrete corners and a concrete wall. Minima
We can see from the first figure that the observed minima values ranged from 50.5 to 52.6 inches.The overall mean minima value was 51.7 inches, with a standard deviation of 0.4 inches. We can see from the second figure that the mean minima values (mean per sample) ranged from 50.8 to 52.2 inches. The standard deviation of mean minima values was 0.3 inches. Therefore, we have SIGMA_DIST = 0.3 (inches).
Edge angles
The relative edge angles of the meetpoint were about 110, 110, and 140 degrees, as shown in the first figure.From the second figure we see that the asymmetry mean was 33.7 degrees, with a standard deviation of 5.7 degrees. Therefore, we have SIGMA_SYM = 5.7 (degrees).
Discussion:Tabulating the data from prior runs and this we have the following:
For a given material, as the equidistant minima distance (meetpoint scale) increases, we see that SIGMA_DIST also increases. |
Go back to: H-SLAM Experiments Page | H-SLAM page
Jump to: People | Robots | Research | Events | Projects | Education | Papers | Software | Links
© Copyright 2002 Sensor Based Planning Lab, Carnegie Mellon University. All Rights Reserved.
![]() |
![]() |
|