Presentation Evaluation

Date:

Presenter:

Evaluator:

Topic & Papers:

Technical Content and Accuracy

Comments:

Score: [5 = Detailed and accurate; 4 = Got a few things wrong; 3 = Acceptable but not great; 2 = Got many things wrong; 1 = Embarrassing]

Synthesis and Placement in Proper Perspective

Comments:

Score: [5 = Excellent; 4 = Good, but could be improved; 3 = Acceptable but not great; 2 = Many missed or erroneous connections; 1 = Clueless]

Clarity, Lucidness, Delivery and Slides

Comments:

Score: [5 = A model of clarity; 4 = A few hazy spots; 3 = Mostly understandable; 2 = High effort to understand; 1 = Clear as mud]

Overall

Score: [5 = Wow!; 4 = Good job; 3 = Don’t worry, you’ll improve; 2 = I’ve seen worse; 1 = about the worst I’ve seen]