Return-Path: Received: from IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU by A.GP.CS.CMU.EDU id aa13297; 2 Aug 96 15:07:45 EDT Received: from IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU by IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU id aa13460; 2 Aug 96 15:07:14 EDT To: Brad.Myers@cs.cmu.edu cc: sumitha+@andrew.CMU.EDU, elie+@andrew.CMU.EDU, keesh@cs.cmu.edu Subject: IOS project's life from 15-820 (B) Interface Software to -> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 96 15:07:09 -0400 Message-ID: <13458.839012829@IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU> From: Eric_Kischell@IUS5.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU Dr. Myers, The intraoperative surgical interface(IOS) was utilized a few weeks ago for a cadaver study at Shadyside Hospital. IOS ran without incident. The current system integrates most supporting applications sans the registration app(which will undergo major cleanup and usability studies) into a single process. In addition IOS now includes support for two footpedals and the optotrak sensor, audio, etc. Additional user requests are being incorporated into IOS with a carefull eye to usability issues. Prior to the cadaver study, I performed a code walkthrough for bug fixes && cleanup. I am currently examining packages to support multithreading audio, footpedal, etc. If you are interested I will let you know when/if IOS is used for "fresh-frozen" and "living" patients. e.-