Newsgroups: talk.origins,sci.skeptic,alt.religion.christian,alt.christnet,talk.religion.misc,alt.postmodern,sci.lang
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!newsflash.concordia.ca!news.nstn.ca!ott.istar!istar.net!tor.istar!east.istar!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!hunter.premier.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!portal.gmu.edu!hearst.acc.Virginia.EDU!murdoch!usenet
From: dcs2e@darwin.clas.virginia.edu (David Swanson)
Subject: Re: Languages: Hard, Harder, Hardest
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ara-mac-225.itc.virginia.edu
Message-ID: <Dv01zJ.AEJ@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
X-Posted-From: InterNews 1.0.1@ara-mac-225.itc.virginia.edu
Sender: -Not-Authenticated-[9087]
Organization: University of Virginia
References: <4t052p$cm@sjx-ixn2.ix.netcomc 
 <Duys9H.1tB@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <4t271h$cga@news.ox.ac.uk>  
 <4t28kt$d6b@news.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 14:09:19 GMT
Xdisclaimer: No attempt was made to authenticate the sender's name.
Lines: 19
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu sci.skeptic:191584 sci.lang:58087

In article <4t28kt$d6b@news.ox.ac.uk>
patrick@gryphon.psych.ox.ac.uk (Patrick Juola) writes:

> Minor correction.  "Three" maximally independed linguistic groups.  The
> data set from which I pulled these numbers also includes Hebrew (which
> was the fourth, hence my confusion), but only the Old Testament.  For
> those who care, it's 2,270,912 bytes long, a good approximation of
> half of the complete Bible.
> 
>         Patrick


Er, something's screwy if you're imagining the "old testament" to be
the same length as the "new testament."


David

"Heideggerian hope comes into question." J.D.
