Newsgroups: sci.lang,soc.culture.esperanto
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!solaris.cc.vt.edu!insosf1.infonet.net!internet.spss.com!markrose
From: markrose@spss.com (Mark Rosenfelder)
Subject: Re: One point against Esperanto
Message-ID: <D5IGB4.2BE@spss.com>
Sender: news@spss.com
Organization: SPSS Inc
References: <794976261snz@storcomp.demon.co.uk> <DJOHNSON.95Mar14125238@tartarus.ucsd.edu> <HINSENK.95Mar15152124@cyclone.ere.umontreal.ca>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1995 02:01:50 GMT
Lines: 9

In article <HINSENK.95Mar15152124@cyclone.ere.umontreal.ca>,
Hinsen Konrad <hinsenk@cyclone.ERE.UMontreal.CA> wrote:
>I am beginning to wonder why some people seem to think plural markers
>are essential on nouns, but bad on adjectives. There are many languages
>that have plural markers on both, and some that have none at all.
>But the only language I know that has this funny mixture is English.

So get to know more languages.  Quechua and Turkish, for instance,
share this feature with English.
