Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!oitnews.harvard.edu!purdue!lerc.nasa.gov!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!news.mathworks.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!tube.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!mk2!
From: dpeachey@vmark.co.uk (Dan)
Subject: Re: SmallTalk: IBM's, Digitalks, etc. - are they different ?
Organization: VMark Software Ltd.
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 96 12:03:37 GMT
Message-ID: <1996Jan12.120337.8015@vmark.co.uk>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
References: <4d3c5d$317@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4d4php$km8@news.ios.com>
Sender: @vmark.co.uk
Lines: 29

vlad@gramercy.ios.com (vlad) wrote:

>legol@aol.com (LEGOL) wrote:

>>Which version of SmallTalk is a standard?

>As I have read somewhere the IBM Smalltalk should be 99% compatible
>with the standard. What standard? Don't ask me.



>*******************************************
>*    Vlastimil Adamovsky                  *
>*  Smalltalk and C++ development          *
>*******************************************

There is currently a commitee that is working on an ANSI smalltalk
standard  (ANSI X3J20).  I believe most vendors of Smalltalk will
converge to this standard,  including VMark,  who own ENFIN smalltalk
(Object Studio)  and who are also members of the commitee.

***************************************************
Dan Peachey
Post Sales Support Analyst (Object Studio)

My opinions are my own,  and not necessarily
those of my employer.
***************************************************

