Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy,comp.ai
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!cornellcs!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!news-peer.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!jqb
From: jqb@netcom.com (Jim Balter)
Subject: Re: Sorities, Properties and The Extensional Stance
Message-ID: <jqbE2nqFq.2uJ@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <850583038snz@longley.demon.co.uk> <jqbE2JCJG.HLn@netcom.com> <850875571snz@longley.demon.co.uk> <jqbE2nox6.M7s@netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 10:57:26 GMT
Lines: 10
Sender: jqb@netcom.netcom.com
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.ai.philosophy:50157 comp.ai:42904

In article <jqbE2nox6.M7s@netcom.com>, Jim Balter <jqb@netcom.com> wrote:
>a real argument.  This is like Hubey, who keeps going "see, n! isn't in N for
>all N",

What I typed is very different from what I was thinking (make sense of that,
Longley), an apparent (whatever that means) consequence of lack of sleep.  I
meant (what are meanings) "see, n! is in N for all n in N".
-- 
<J Q B>

