Newsgroups: comp.ai
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!news.mathworks.com!news.duke.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!harlqn.co.uk!harlequin.co.uk!jason
From: jason@harlequin.co.uk (Jason Trenouth)
Subject: Re: moderate comp.ai? (was Re: RFD: comp.ai.no_bozos)
In-Reply-To: nau@cs.umd.edu's message of 21 Feb 1995 22:28:06 GMT
Message-ID: <JASON.95Feb22122854@wratting.harlqn.co.uk>
X-Attribution: Jason
Sender: usenet@harlequin.co.uk (Usenet Maintainer)
Organization: Harlequin Ltd, Barrington Hall, Cambridge UK
References: <push-1802951020590001@mind.mit.edu> <NAU.95Feb19223329@frabjous.cs.umd.edu>
	<push-2002951349140001@mind.mit.edu>
	<3ib460$9vc@vitalstatistix.cs.uoregon.edu>
	<MIKEW.95Feb20174755@willow.cs.washington.edu>
	<push-2102950055070001@mind.mit.edu>
	<1995Feb21.194151.26329@ptolemy-ethernet.arc.nasa.gov>
	<NAU.95Feb21172806@frabjous.cs.umd.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 12:28:54 GMT
Lines: 24


In article <1995Feb21.194151.26329@ptolemy-ethernet.arc.nasa.gov> minton@kronos.arc.nasa.gov (Steve Minton) writes:

Steve> I think establishing a moderated comp.ai.research is a great
Steve> idea. A human moderator would be best, if we can find one.  An
Steve> automated moderator (automatically rejecting cross-posted
Steve> articles) would be my second choice, but still preferable to an
Steve> unmoderated group.

In article <NAU.95Feb21172806@frabjous.cs.umd.edu> nau@cs.umd.edu (Dana Nau) writes:

Dana> I agree.

Why not moderate comp.ai and create a new unmoderated
comp.ai.discussion? Or is it not possible to change the charter of an
existing news group?

BTW I agree with the idea of a moderated AI group.

--
_____________________________________________________________________________
| Jason Trenouth,                        | EMAIL: jason@uk.co.harlequin     |
| Harlequin Ltd, Barrington Hall,        | TEL:   (0223) 872522             |
| Barrington, Cambridge CB2 5RG, UK      | FAX:   (0223) 872519             |
