From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!utcsri!rpi!usc!wupost!uunet!trwacs!erwin Wed Sep 16 21:21:28 EDT 1992
Article 6759 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Xref: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca sci.cognitive:394 comp.ai.philosophy:6759
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!utcsri!rpi!usc!wupost!uunet!trwacs!erwin
>From: erwin@trwacs.fp.trw.com (Harry Erwin)
Newsgroups: sci.cognitive,comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Mind Reading
Keywords: chaos, neurobiology
Message-ID: <713@trwacs.fp.trw.com>
Date: 2 Sep 92 12:47:59 GMT
Followup-To: sci.cognitive
Organization: TRW Systems Division, Fairfax VA
Lines: 43

I suppose we all use personal experience as an input to our research. I'm
going to describe something here that has influenced my ideas.

I've learned over the years to read minds. This is _not_ ESP, but rather a
four-stage process as follows:

1. Instantiate a personality model,
2. Calibrate it based on observation,
3. Do a process switch into the calibrated model,
4. Observe the model.

The personality model appears to have some relationship to a full
personality--it's often good enough to predict behavior in the short term.
Observation includes defocused inputs. The process switch requires
suppression of the sense of myself, and often requires a displacement of
the point of view to the location of the other individual. Observation is
difficult, since it involves deliberately "being" within the personality
model, rather than in one's own comfortable personality. I find this whole
process exhausting.

The results are often startling, and it is the simple existence of this
sort of ability that leads me to speculate on distributed cognition in
social groups. 

A couple of insights have emerged from this:
1. Lou Pecota and Tom Stafford have shown that chaotic processes are very
   cheap to control. Freeman's work seems to indicate that a chaotic
   process is an efficient point to start from if you're doing pattern
   matching. Perhaps human personalities are based on chaotic processes
   (as Paul Raup's work seems to indicate) for efficiency of control.
2. The ease with which we innovate based on existing ideas may well
   reflect a chaotic process responding to small control signals. Since
   this "stream of consciousness" appears to be generated by a process
   akin to the process by which speech is generated, we may find that
   the evolutionary origin of this innovative process to be associated
   with the evolutionary origin of speech.

Cheers,

-- 
Harry Erwin
Internet: erwin@trwacs.fp.trw.com



