From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!nott!hpb.hwc.ca!inunn Tue Nov 24 10:52:48 EST 1992
Article 7713 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Xref: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca sci.cognitive:763 comp.ai.philosophy:7713 bionet.neuroscience:241
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!nott!hpb.hwc.ca!inunn
>From: inunn@hpb.hwc.ca
Newsgroups: sci.cognitive,comp.ai.philosophy,bionet.neuroscience
Subject: Re: Cognition
Message-ID: <1992Nov24.091819.480@hpb.hwc.ca>
Date: 24 Nov 92 09:18:18 EST
References: <erwin.722201553@trwacs>
Organization: Health and Welfare, Canada
Lines: 8

Help me to understand this.  The input and output (semantic association - 
are we talking memory?) are invariant but the what's inbetween changes.
It gets rewired in a sense.  If I'm on track so far, what bothers me is
if you change the in-between - variance in the olefactory system -
how do you retain the connection between the stimulus and the memory
of it?

Ian Nunn


