From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!mucs!nessie!db.mcc.ac.uk!zlsiida Tue Nov 24 10:52:39 EST 1992
Article 7698 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Xref: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca comp.ai.philosophy:7698 sci.logic:2401
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!mucs!nessie!db.mcc.ac.uk!zlsiida
>From: zlsiida@fs1.mcc.ac.uk (dave budd)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Self-Reference and Paradox (was Re: Human intelligence...)
Message-ID: <zlsiida.450@fs1.mcc.ac.uk>
Date: 20 Nov 92 11:53:09 GMT
References: <1992Nov14.151559.13227@oracorp.com> <BxtBwx.LvH@unx.sas.com>
Sender: news@nessie.mcc.ac.uk (Usenet News System)
Organization: Manchester Computing Centre
Lines: 20

In article <BxtBwx.LvH@unx.sas.com> sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com (Gary Merrill) writes:
>In article <1992Nov14.151559.13227@oracorp.com>, daryl@oracorp.com (Daryl McCullough) writes:
>|>     This sentence is false.
>|> 
>|> refers to an unrestricted notion of falsity, and is therefore
>|> meaningless. We can replace "false" by a restricted notion of falsity

>This sort of thing has been tried before.  One problem is that the displayed
>sentence is *not* meaningless in any normal sense of this term.  We
>know perfectly well what it means -- and that's the problem.

No, we know what it SAYS, not what it MEANS.
Ever talk to a woman? (copious smileys and a brief aside to mention that the 
shrinks find many relationship problems come down to different modes of 
language usage)

  From the UK phone book Yellow Pages:  BORING - see Civil Engineers   

  Dave Budd, MCC, Oxford Rd, Manchester, England   (44|0)61-275-6033  
  D.Budd@mcc.ac.uk                                          fax 6040


