From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!utcsri!rutgers!jvnc.net!nuscc!ntuix!eoahmad Wed Aug 12 16:52:04 EDT 1992
Article 6542 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!utcsri!rutgers!jvnc.net!nuscc!ntuix!eoahmad
>From: eoahmad@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Othman Ahmad)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Memory and store/retrieve. (was: Defining Intelligence)
Message-ID: <1992Aug1.160628.3136@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg>
Date: 1 Aug 92 16:06:28 GMT
References: <1992Jul28.194953.7337@puma.ATL.GE.COM>
Organization: Nanyang Technological University - Singapore
Lines: 20

In article <1992Jul28.194953.7337@puma.ATL.GE.COM> ljones@andrew.ATL.GE.COM (LeRoy E Jones) writes:

: 
: In summary, I think this all started with trying to define intelligence, and
: the only practical intelligence is an evident intelligence. Intelligence
: that exists but has no impact on the world, is useless. If we agree that 
: the intelligence we are interested in defining is evident intelligence, then
: we can say that there needs to be a store/retrieve function associated with
: it, even if it is only a net result, and not indicative of internal
: implementation.
This is the way I define intelligence for Quantitative Measure. I may present
this method at ISITA, singapore.
	It is useless to rely on particular implementations which can become
obsolete quickly.

--
Othman bin Ahmad, School of EEE,
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 2263.
Internet Email: eoahmad@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg
Bitnet Email: eoahmad@ntuvax.bitnet


