From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!utgpu!csd.unb.ca!morgan.ucs.mun.ca!nstn.ns.ca!news.cs.indiana.edu!mips!pacbell.com!att!att!fang!tarpit!cs.ucf.edu!news Thu Apr 16 11:33:20 EDT 1992
Article 4975 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!utgpu!csd.unb.ca!morgan.ucs.mun.ca!nstn.ns.ca!news.cs.indiana.edu!mips!pacbell.com!att!att!fang!tarpit!cs.ucf.edu!news
>From: clarke@acme.ucf.edu (Thomas Clarke)
Subject: Re: ai
Message-ID: <1992Apr6.142044.22411@cs.ucf.edu>
Sender: news@cs.ucf.edu (News system)
Organization: University of Central Florida
References: <atten.702298596@groucho.phil.ruu.nl>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 14:20:44 GMT

In article <atten.702298596@groucho.phil.ruu.nl> atten@phil.ruu.nl (Mark van  
Atten) writes:
| I want to discuss
|  
| II THE SIGNIFICANCE OF GOEDEL'S THEOREM TO AI
| 
| II.1 This is not repeat not Lucas' argument
| II.2 Penrose's argument
| II.3 Goedel's theorem and ai
| II.4 non-algorithmic processes
| II.5 the infinite mind
| 
My receipt of your post did not contain II.  Was it cut off?  Should I look for  
a future post?

Most anxious to hear how you distinguish Penrose's argument from Lucas'.  To my  
ear they are fundamentally similar.


