From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff Sun Dec  1 13:06:01 EST 1991
Article 1687 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff
>From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Is dialectical thought an "informal logic"?
Message-ID: <5726@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 27 Nov 91 20:15:06 GMT
References: <rreiner.690823427@yorku.ca> <LV0uBB1w164w@depsych.Gwinnett.COM>
Reply-To: jeff@aiai.UUCP (Jeff Dalton)
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
Lines: 13

In article <LV0uBB1w164w@depsych.Gwinnett.COM> rc@depsych.Gwinnett.COM (Richard Carlson) writes:
>rreiner@nexus.yorku.ca (Richard Reiner) writes:
>> 
>> We have heard this sort of thing before, from Hubert Dreyfus and his
>> ilk and from others, and we have learned that the arguments backing up
>> such claims evaporate when a serious attempt is made to state them
>> clearly.
>> 
>> Would you care to state yours clearly?
>
>What do you mean by "formalize"? ;^)

I.e., "no".


