From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!unogate!stgprao Tue Nov 19 11:09:01 EST 1991
Article 1199 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!unogate!stgprao
>From: stgprao@xing.unocal.com (Richard Ottolini)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Artificial Stupidity?
Message-ID: <1991Nov5.151109.28825@unocal.com>
Date: 5 Nov 91 15:11:09 GMT
References: <TODD.91Nov4211052@juno.elcom.nitech.ac.jp>
Sender: news@unocal.com (USENET News)
Distribution: comp.ai,comp.ai.philosophy
Organization: Unocal Corporation, Anaheim, California
Lines: 8
Originator: stgprao@xing

In article <TODD.91Nov4211052@juno.elcom.nitech.ac.jp> todd@juno.elcom.nitech.ac.jp writes:
>
>
>This may sound ridiculous, but has anyone ever carried out
>research into Artificial Stupidity?

A lot of conventional psychology is examining the defects of mental processes,
e.g. optical illusions.


