From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!barry Tue Nov 19 11:10:25 EST 1991
Article 1348 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Xref: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca rec.arts.books:9982 sci.philosophy.tech:966 comp.ai.philosophy:1348
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!barry
>From: barry@chezmoto.ai.mit.edu (Barry Kort)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books,sci.philosophy.tech,comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Daniel Dennett (was Re: Commenting on the posting
Message-ID: <BARRY.91Nov16210040@chezmoto.ai.mit.edu>
Date: 17 Nov 91 02:00:40 GMT
Sender: news@ai.mit.edu
Organization: MicroMuse
Lines: 14
In-reply-to: dnk@yarra-glen.aaii.oz.au's message of 16 Nov 91 01:40:15 GMT


In article    From: dnk@yarra-glen.aaii.oz.au (David Kinny)

   Ah yes, that most convincing of guidelines:

	   "If you see someone offer an argument that conflicts with *my*
	    dearly-held beliefs, you may conclude that he is a charlatan,
	    worthy only of scorn and ridicule.

Heh, this reminds me of my favorite definition of 'Sane' -- "Thinks
like me."  And the corresonding definition of 'Insane' -- "Doesn't
think like me."  :)

Barry Kort


