From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!uknet!warwick!nott-cs!ucl-cs!news Mon Dec 16 11:00:34 EST 1991
Article 1979 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!uknet!warwick!nott-cs!ucl-cs!news
>From: G.Joly@cs.ucl.ac.uk (Gordon Joly)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Searle, again
Message-ID: <2151@ucl-cs.uucp>
Date: 9 Dec 91 15:24:57 GMT
Sender: news@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Lines: 22

In article <odCwNqy00WBKI3V7gH@andrew.cmu.edu> fb0m+@andrew.cmu.edu (Franklin Boyle) writes:
>> Gordon Joly writes (in response to my statement about "understanding"
>> not being in the rule book):
>> 
>> > No, the understanding is in both the Book of Instruction and the
>> > Heads of the People who Wrote the Book of Instruction.
>> 
>> In what sense are the symbols and rules in the book like "mental
>> objects" (or states if you like) in the head? 
>> 
>> -Frank

If not in "the head", then where are they?


____

Gordon Joly                                       +44 71 387 7050 ext 3716
Internet: G.Joly@cs.ucl.ac.uk          UUCP: ...!{uunet,ukc}!ucl-cs!G.Joly
Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, LONDON WC1E 6BT

  he said what? - he said "hello" -- that's a bit aggressive isn't it?


