From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!rochester!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!fb0m+ Mon Dec  9 10:47:44 EST 1991
Article 1831 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!rochester!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!fb0m+
>From: fb0m+@andrew.cmu.edu (Franklin Boyle)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Searle, again
Message-ID: <odCwNqy00WBKI3V7gH@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 3 Dec 91 18:01:26 GMT
Organization: Cntr for Design of Educational Computing, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 10

Gordon Joly writes (in response to my statement about "understanding"
not being in the rule book):

> No, the understanding is in both the Book of Instruction and the
> Heads of the People who Wrote the Book of Instruction.

In what sense are the symbols and rules in the book like "mental
objects" (or states if you like) in the head? 

-Frank


