From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!jvnc.net!nuscc!hilbert!smoliar Mon Dec  9 10:47:40 EST 1991
Article 1824 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!jvnc.net!nuscc!hilbert!smoliar
>From: smoliar@hilbert.iss.nus.sg (stephen smoliar)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Dennett on Edelman--what a total loss
Message-ID: <1991Dec3.092058.12918@nuscc.nus.sg>
Date: 3 Dec 91 09:20:58 GMT
References: <1991Nov21.145350.5725@husc3.harvard.edu> <JMC.91Nov24203029@SAIL.Stanford.EDU> <57569@netnews.upenn.edu>
Sender: usenet@nuscc.nus.sg
Organization: Institute of Systems Science, NUS, Singapore
Lines: 14

In article <57569@netnews.upenn.edu> weemba@libra.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P
Wiener) writes:
>
>Who else does Dennett leave out?  I looked through the index, and found
>a few of the following, but what was there on them was marginal: Estler,
>Sperry, Luria, Caplan, etc.
>
Does he have anything to say about Vygotsky (and if so, based on what
translation . . . if any)?
-- 
Stephen W. Smoliar; Institute of Systems Science
National University of Singapore; Heng Mui Keng Terrace
Kent Ridge, SINGAPORE 0511
Internet:  smoliar@iss.nus.sg


