From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!cam Thu Dec 26 23:57:13 EST 1991
Article 2282 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Xref: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca comp.ai.philosophy:2282 sci.philosophy.tech:1526
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!cam
>From: cam@castle.ed.ac.uk (Chris Malcolm)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy,sci.philosophy.tech
Subject: Re: Causes and Reasons
Message-ID: <16114@castle.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 19 Dec 91 16:12:37 GMT
Article-I.D.: castle.16114
References: <1991Dec17.154142.21021@psych.toronto.edu> <16089@castle.ed.ac.uk> <1991Dec18.151208.6749@husc3.harvard.edu>
Organization: Edinburgh University
Lines: 23

In article <1991Dec18.151208.6749@husc3.harvard.edu> zeleny@brauer.harvard.edu (Mikhail Zeleny) writes:
>In article <16089@castle.ed.ac.uk> 
>cam@castle.ed.ac.uk (Chris Malcolm) writes:

>>In article <1991Dec17.154142.21021@psych.toronto.edu> 
>>michael@psych.toronto.edu (Michael Gemar) writes:

MG:
>>>*I* uniquely determine what *I* am thinking about.  I am the sole arbiter
>>>of the content of my conscious thoughts.  How could it possibly be otherwise?

CM:
>>Simple. You could be wrong. People often are.

>He could be wrong, but not in a way that could be legitimately 
>corrected by you.

What on earth is the point of this silly and irrelevant ad hominem
attack? Oh, sorry, Mikhail, didn't spot your sig.
-- 
Chris Malcolm    cam@uk.ac.ed.aifh          +44 (0)31 650 3085
Department of Artificial Intelligence,    Edinburgh University
5 Forrest Hill, Edinburgh, EH1 2QL, UK                DoD #205


