Newsgroups: talk.politics.european-union,bit.listserv.slovak-l,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.nordic,soc.culture.german,soc.culture.esperanto,sci.lang
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news4.ner.bbnplanet.net!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!howland.erols.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!commpost!usenet
From: pardoej@lonnds.ml.com (Julian Pardoe LADS LDN X1428)
Subject: Re: Concerning the number of esperantists
Message-ID: <Dw4r3D.18E@tigadmin.ml.com>
Sender: usenet@tigadmin.ml.com (News Account)
Reply-To: pardoej@lonnds.ml.com
Organization: Merrill Lynch Europe
References: <4ud87j$3pg@mn5.swip.net>
Distribution: inet
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 13:35:36 GMT
Lines: 24
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu bit.listserv.slovak-l:21419 sci.lang:59980

In article <4ud87j$3pg@mn5.swip.net>, igor.gazdik@mailbox.swipnet.se (Igor GAZDIK) writes:
-->#In article <4tvrf4$38t@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com>, sjzaft@ix.netcom.co 
-->#says...
-->#>
-->
-->#>What are some of the specific ways in which the grammar of Interlingua
-->#>is many times simpler than the grammar of Esperanto?
-->#>
-->
-->	the interlingua grammar can be learned in 30 minutes.
-->	the esperanto grammar: maybe in 3 years, or so...

Amazing Ivan, yet another of your tightly argued and convincing demonstrations
of the superiority of Interlingua.  The wealth of empirical evidence that you present
is impressive.

Why not just say, as some idiot Esperantist did, that Interlingua is closer to the
language-processing pathways in the brain?  That should clinch it!

-- jP --




