Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!nntp.sei.cmu.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.erols.net!feed1.news.erols.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!en.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!165.254.2.53!nonexistent.com!not-for-mail
From: vlad@world2u.com (Vlastimil Adamovsky)
Subject: Re: C, C++, Java, Smalltalk
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
X-Nntp-Posting-User: (Unauthenticated)
Message-ID: <E68ntn.E65@nonexistent.com>
References: <33108184.4530@ix.netcom.com> <01bc2390$dfc195c0$5f5db5cf@acer>
X-Trace: 857008280/16193
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: i123.140.world2u.com
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 01:54:08 GMT
Lines: 26

"Michel Dufour" <mimi2@netcom.ca> wrote:

>Hi Thomas,

>I am agree with you, Smalltalk is better than all the others languages you
>mention.

>For serious computer specialist that is evident, but it is not for other
>specialist and particularly for business people and often, they are the
>people who decide, unfortunately.

Those business people are people we work for. They pay. We listen.

>I think Smalltalk is here to stay. Serious and competent computer
>specialist will never disappear but it is not the majority, again:
>unfortunately.

A serious and competent computer (you mean software) specialist without business

feeling is useless, unless he can afford to do so.


 Vlastimil Adamovsky
 ** C++ and Smalltalk consultant **


