Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.skeptic,alt.consciousness,sci.psychology,comp.ai.philosophy,sci.bio,sci.philosophy.meta,rec.arts.books
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!dcs.gla.ac.uk!unix.brighton.ac.uk!mjs14
From: mjs14@unix.brighton.ac.uk (shute)
Subject: Re: John Mc Carthy's request re: Penrose (mechanisms for consciousness)
Message-ID: <1994Nov21.161250.16714@unix.brighton.ac.uk>
Organization: University of Brighton, UK
References: <3a61gp$42v@netaxs.com> <1994Nov16.014549@west.cscwc.pima.edu> <3ae7fs$g8p@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 1994 16:12:50 GMT
Lines: 11
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu sci.physics:101044 sci.skeptic:95977 sci.psychology:30129 comp.ai.philosophy:22405 sci.bio:23243 sci.philosophy.meta:14910

In article <3ae7fs$g8p@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com> sarfatti@ix.netcom.com (Jack Sarfatti) writes:
>microtubule dimers obeying Penrose's "OR" generalization away from 

Yet again, I have to apologise for my ignorance... and ask some kind soul
to tell me what "OR" stands for...

Thanks in advance for solving my internal terminology breakdown.
Cheers,
-- 

Malcolm SHUTE.         (The AM Mollusc:   v_@_ )        Disclaimer: all
