Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.skeptic,alt.consciousness,sci.psychology,comp.ai.philosophy,sci.bio,sci.philosophy.meta,rec.arts.books,
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!news.hal.COM!halsoft.com!netcomsv!kiki.icd.teradyne.com!beaux!pnorton
From: pnorton@beaux.atwc.teradyne.com (Peter Norton)
Subject: Re: Roger Penrose's New Book (in HTML) 1.0
Message-ID: <CzHs2u.8L1@beaux.atwc.teradyne.com>
Organization: Chrono-Synclastic-Infundibulum Sirens of Titan, Inc.
References: <39unnl$l9o@ixnews1.ix.netcom.com> <3a39hi$rsp@decaxp.harvard.edu> <3a7p5v$nao@longwood.cs.ucf.edu>
Distribution: inet
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 1994 01:56:54 GMT
Lines: 19
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu sci.physics:100863 sci.skeptic:95698 sci.psychology:30056 comp.ai.philosophy:22309 sci.bio:23209 sci.philosophy.meta:14878

clarke@longwood.cs.ucf.edu (Tom Clarke) writes:
>
>Actually, I like Stapp's ideas.  His Heisenberg/James theory of
>how the mind and QM dovetail, seems to me to leave adequate room
>for subtle ESP like effects.  Not telekinesis, that would violate
>conservation of energy, but EPR-type correlations could 
>result in ESP-like correlations between two minds, at least in
>principle.  

In practice, this is called 'synchronicity'.
The appropriate next question would be: "why don't they happen to me?"

Cheers
---
"One sleeps much more soundly at night if one does
 not think too hard about the theory of the I Ching."
-Carl Jung


