Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!yeshua.marcam.com!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu!decwrl!amd!amdint.amd.com!txnews.amd.com!news
From: charles.herrick@amd.com
Subject: Is it OOP, or is it Memorex (was]: Looking for Development Platform Recommendations
Message-ID: <CyprtI.5qM@txnews.amd.com>
Sender: news@txnews.amd.com
Nntp-Posting-Host: aunext1
Reply-To: charles.herrick@amd.com
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Austin, TX, USA
References: <783802148marten.marten@feki.toppoint.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 1994 22:58:28 GMT
Lines: 22

In article <783802148marten.marten@feki.toppoint.de> marten@feki.toppoint.de  
(Marten Feldtmann) writes:
> In article <9409317836.AA783650401@ksc.ksccary.com> Kyle Brown  
<kbrown@KSCCARY.COM> writes:
> 
> >If a language does not support ALL FOUR of:
> >
> >Objects (i.e. encapsulations of hidden state + named operations)
> >Classes
> >Inheritance
> >Polymorphism
> >
> >then it is NOT object-oriented!  The combination is the standard (Wegner &
> 
>  And what about the instance-based OO-systems like PARTS ? They do not
> have classes.

then it's not Object-oriented, is it?

note the Followup: header line
--
contents intended to represent only personal opinions
