Newsgroups: talk.origins,sci.skeptic,alt.postmodern,sci.lang,alt.feminism
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!godot.cc.duq.edu!newsgate.duke.edu!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!hearst.acc.Virginia.EDU!murdoch!usenet
From: dcs2e@darwin.clas.virginia.edu (David Swanson)
Subject: Re: Scientific epistomology  (was: "Social Text")
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ara-mac-251.itc.virginia.edu
Message-ID: <DrrCF5.453@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
X-Posted-From: InterNews 1.0.1@ara-mac-251.itc.virginia.edu
Sender: -Not-Authenticated-[9087]
Organization: University of Virginia
References: <Drou8w.9KF@eskimo.com> <4nqr4b$4hq@netnews.upenn.edu> 
 <4nqu87$2hs@swsu65.swmed.edu> <4nr1k0$266@netnews.upenn.edu> 
 <4nrgbp$8at@peaches.cs.utexas.edu>  <4nrhe5$aso@netnews.upenn.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 13:35:28 GMT
Xdisclaimer: No attempt was made to authenticate the sender's name.
Lines: 20
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu sci.skeptic:171787 sci.lang:54016

In article <4nrhe5$aso@netnews.upenn.edu>
weinecks@mail2.sas.upenn.edu (Silke-Maria  Weineck) writes:

> A misunderstanding; I was more concerned with "phenomena" that only come 
> to exist as "problems in the natural world" through the perception of the 
> problematizers. "Why is it that women have no super-ego?" (I actually 
> believe that is somewhat true, but you get the drift...)
> 
> Silke

You're not going to find many glorifiers of science who consider Freud
a scientist.  How about a different example?  Besides, Sartre claimed
to have no super-ego, and so do I.


David
"It is interesting to note that the death penalty for individuals is
less controversial than the mere suggestion that a few corporations may
have forfeited their right to exist.  How many people does a company
have to harm before we question if it ought to exist?" Paul Hawken
