Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!torn!newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!stpl.ists.ca!dchhabra
From: dchhabra@stpl.ists.ca (Deepak Chhabra)
Subject: Re: hawks vs leafs lastnight
Message-ID: <1993Apr19.214752.28602@newshub.ists.ca>
Sender: news@newshub.ists.ca (News Subsystem)
Nntp-Posting-Host: stpl.ists.ca
Organization: Solar Terresterial Physics Laboratory, ISTS
References: <93106.082502ACPS6992@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> <1993Apr18.153820.10118@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1993 21:47:52 GMT
Lines: 18

In article <1993Apr18.153820.10118@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy) writes:

>>on all replays, joe murphy's goal shouldn't have counted ! 
>>the game would have ended in 2-2 tie !

>I thought the red light went on...thus, in the review, the presumption
>would be to find conclusive evidence that the puck did not go in the
>net...from the replays I say, even from the rear, the evidence wasn't
>conclusive that the puck was in or out...in my opinion...

I was under the impression that the objective is to find conclusive
evidence that the puck _did_ cross the line.  And, the replays I saw showed 
fairly conclusively that the puck did _not_ cross the goal line at any
time anyway.  Somebody screwed up.  


dchhabra@stpl.ists.ca

